Musalaman. I read some of your 'refuted' posts. You may think they had 'refuted' whatever I said. However, I say you refuted yourself. I didn't bother reading all of them, since it's just typical Theist bullcrap (answering a question with a question).
I don't want anyone to be interested in Atheism. I am glad that the Atheist community isn't composed of people like you as a matter of fact. Having people like yourself, just would really tarnish the quality of Atheism to becoming Agnostic.
Atheism isn't a religion, it's not even an organized movement. Atheism is just a way of thought, and is highly dwelled in thought to use rationale is the primary source of thought, without looking at spiritual forms and deities.
I really feel sorry for theists, especially Muslims who tend to be the most fanatic of all religions, because they waste the most time out of all religions to worship their god(s). Some of which, will dress a certain way, eat at certain times, pray about 5 times a day, and CAUSE WAR in the world and trouble among other religions doesn't seem like a very good use of religion. Religion in the world tends to be more of a problem-causer than a problem-solver.
In addition, since I would like this to be as controversial as possible. I ask you muslims a question.
Prove to me Muhammad was illiterate and that he or his 'party' wasn't capable of writing the Q'uran?
When answering this question, I beg you to not to use the Q'uran as the basis of the proof that youre trying to prove, because the Q'uran itself is what you're trying to prove! In addition, I would also like to remind you, that you were not present during Muhammad's time and neither was anyone, any doctor, any philosopher or scholar in this century. So avoid using proof of scholarly document by Islamic characters. Provide your OWN rationale and your OWN reason.
I know this is sort of unfair, I guess for a theist this may seem virtually impossible. Well good luck.
Arai