yes obviously so now answer the question please?
sultan toora i've posted a new thread in the poetry section about khushal khan baba.go read it ..if u want in pashto i can post the link.
plus wats this shia sunni fasad going on here.plz it is requested to stop it ..have respect for other's beleif.(no offence plz).
if u say sth bad about another person's beleifs tomorrow the other guy will say sth bad about yours .and the guy who started it will be responsible.
fakeer,
The reasons why I didn't contribute any further to this thread are as follows:
- I was out of town & then had my finals.
- You did a great job in making my point that the Talaban was/is a 'Pashtoon struggle' against those whom they considered 'not worthy to rule Afghanistan'. So, it is a real stretch for those who try to make it an Islamic issue.
Just a pointer, as long as ethnic groups will not shed away their ethnic superiority complex & their so-called God given right to rule, it will hard to people of our world to progress. Pakistan is not for Punjabis but for all that live there. Afghanistan is not for Pashtoon but all that live there! India is not a Hindu nation, rather it belongs to all those that contribute to it!
welcome back ahmed jee.how were ur exams
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
mine were huhhhh sighs not bad i guess.
so back to the topic.
yes pakistan is not for panjabis it belongs to all.did ever a pashtun rule it (dont mention ayub khan he was from mansehra and he was hindku speaking which is not even close to being a pashtun.plus hindko speaking ppl dont call themselves pashtoon.thr hindku speaking
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
)
its always some panjabi or muhajir whos been ruling it.ie the true pakistanis.
india being ruled by its own ppl ie the hindus.
why shudnt afghanistan be ruled by the pashtuns.
i think its simple as it seems like..
anyway thanx for replying