Following is an article sent to me by a friend of mine who before 7/7 was quite sane… I wonder if such stuff is cooking even in liberal minds, what would the world be in 50 years?
How would you answer these allegations?
The Islamic Manchurian Candidates
One of the most absurd sights we have been forced to watch whilst cringing from our settees in the last week has been the sight of various Establishment figures ranging from the Neo-Druid liberal Arch-Bishop of England, Prince Charles and Tony Blair all lining up to deliver their sermons on the mount about the true nature of Islam and how almost all the Muslim population of Britain have no understanding of their own religion. They tell us ‘ the terrorists are a minority and have no support in the Muslim community’ but this is just another lie they are using to try and delude us into accepting more of the same liberal bull**** that they have been feeding us for years.
In an article on Apr 8th 2004 From The Economist Global Agenda it stated that “ opinion polls suggest there is still a long way to go in eradicating sympathy for terrorists”. An in early March 2004 , for instance, found that 13% of Britain’s Muslims would regard further attacks on America by al-Qaeda as “justified”.
Whilst a recent found 8 % of Muslims in Britain thought an Al Qaeda attack on Britain was also justified.
****British polls ****
A Telegraph poll in 2002 found that 1 in 5 Muslims in Britain had no loyalty to Britain whilst almost 50 per cent of nearly two million Muslims in this country still cling to the theory floated after 9/11 that attacks in the US were planned by Jews and Zionists to defame Islam.
Almost 13 per cent of those questioned were bold enough to say that they felt “not very loyal” towards Britain and six per cent “not loyal at all”, 31 per cent felt “very loyal” and 44 per cent “fairly loyal”. An analyst told the Hindustan Times that even among the very loyal and fairly loyal one should discount for those who might have been “diplomatic”.
A poll in The Guardian this year also stated that 26 percent of British Muslims felt integration has gone too far. This means a third of Muslims regard ‘integration’ as a threat to their community whilst almost 1 in 5 support Al Qaeda and almost 1 in 10 support an Al Qaeda attack on Britain. The fanatics are not a small minority, they are a group who operate in a community with greater support, percentage wise, than New Labour got in the election who were voted into power with 22 % of the electorate’s vote. 26 % of Muslims feel that integration has gone too far, and these are the people who support the 1 in 8 who support the attacks on Britain.
****Living a lie ****
In one of the comments made to the Jihadwatch website a writer states ; Again, one is left with the “Manchurian Candidate” or “My son the fanatic” problem – one never knows who will metamorphose from “moderate” to “immoderate” Muslims “ . These were prescient words. The terrorists who attacked the tubes and bus in London on 7/7/05 were not long bearded, Hook handed, one eyed ranting lunatics in white robes handing out videos with beheadings of Ken Bigley on them. They were your next door neighbour, the son of the chip shop owner down the street, Jaz down the road and the local supply teacher at the primary school. They drove Mercedes cars, dated your sister and integrated into mainstream British culture. And it was all a lie.
All the while they were pretending to assimilate they were adopting the principle of Al-Taqiya (legitimately telling lies to infidels and spreading subversion). The word ‘al-Taqiyya’ literally means: ‘Concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.’ " A one-word translation would be ‘Dissimulation.’ "
Al-Taqiya from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy." According to Al-Taqiya Muslims were granted the Shar’iya (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy’s cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition."
In other words it is the duty of Muslims who despise the west to lie to infidels and kufrs in order to infiltrate their societies and destroy them from within. Therefore is it any wonder that these four British born bombers appeared to be normal but in reality were ticking bombs ready to blow us up. They were taught to lie to the British people, infiltrate our society and deceive us as to their real murderous intentions until the bombs were ready to be blown up on the tube. One wonders how many other Muslim terrorists and their supporters are currently shedding crocodile tears over these bombings and condemning them in public whilst privately funding the bombers and preparing to plant more bombs on our city streets. There could be thousands of potential Islamic Manchurian Candidates out in our streets, and we would never know. They would smile and chat with us at the school gates, serve us a curry at night in our local restaurant, drive the bus in the morning and all the time the bombs could be ticking. That is the lesson Britain learnt this week that the media are trying to hide. That the real threat to our society is not the extremists we see on the news being reported as ‘bad muslims’ who we can dislike and despise with all the support of the government and the media itself, those in white robes with beards who hand out leaflets with hooked hands and who support Osama Bin Laden in public. No, the real threat to us are the silent ones , the Cleanskins , who adopt our ways and pretend to be our friends until they are ready to destroy us.
The writer continues “And someone who is “immoderate” in Islam is a permanent threat. And the “moderate” Muslims, when it comes to political power, and stifling criticism, lend weight and influence – in the first case simply that of numbers, in the second by their attempted denial or feigned ignorance of the essence of Islam – are as dangerous as the “immoderate” ones. Wise words again.
****Mankind weak ****
In an article by Amir Taheri in The Sunday Times on July 8th 2005 he wrote ;
“The ideological soil in which al-Qaeda, and the many groups using its brand name, grow was described by one of its original masterminds, the Pakistani Abul-Ala al-Maudoodi more than 40 years ago. It goes something like this: when God created mankind He made all their bodily needs and movements subject to inescapable biological rules but decided to leave their spiritual, social and political needs and movements largely subject to their will. Soon, however, it became clear that Man cannot run his affairs the way God wants. So God started sending prophets to warn man and try to goad him on to the right path. A total of 128,000 prophets were sent, including Moses and Jesus. They all failed. Finally, God sent Muhammad as the last of His prophets and the bearer of His ultimate message, Islam. With the advent of Islam all previous religions were “abrogated” (mansukh), and their followers regarded as “infidel” (kuffar). The aim of all good Muslims, therefore, is to convert humanity to Islam, which regulates Man’s spiritual, economic, political and social moves to the last detail.
But what if non-Muslims refuse to take the right path? Here answers diverge. Some believe that the answer is dialogue and argument until followers of the “abrogated faiths” recognise their error and agree to be saved by converting to Islam. This is the view of most of the imams preaching in the mosques in the West. But others, including Osama bin Laden, a disciple of al-Maudoodi, believe that the Western-dominated world is too mired in corruption to hear any argument, and must be shocked into conversion through spectacular ghazavat (raids) of the kind we saw in New York and Washington in 2001, in Madrid last year, and now in London “.
****Converting non-believers ****
Here two sentences stand out “Some believe that the answer is dialogue and argument until followers of the “abrogated faiths” recognise their error and agree to be saved by converting to Islam. This is the view of most of the imams preaching in the mosques in the West”. This is a groundbreaking statement. What Amir Taheri asserts is that the only difference between the terrorists and the moderates within Islam is their methodology. The terrorists want to bomb us into surrendering our democracy, our rights, our culture, our values, our heritage, our nation, our history and our future whilst moderate Muslims are prepared to preach to us until they get the same result. Whether the terrorists bomb us into surrender of the moderates preach us into submission, the end result is the total destruction of our way of life and everything we hold dear as a people and a nation. The aims are the same the methods merely different. That’s a terrifying realisation for the British people and reveals that our tolerance is just another weapon being used against us.
****The big threat ****
The writer on Jihad Watch continues “ The endless discussion of moderates and immoderates gets Infidels tangled in knots, and off the point. The point is that Islam itself is a threat to everything about Western civilization that is worth saving; that it has a record, after Jihad-conquest, of subjugation of all non-Muslims – those who are allowed to live – that results, as the historical record over 1350 years shows very clearly, of humiliation, degradation, and physical insecurity. This was studied by a number of scholars in the past, who then died, and whose work, over the past 40-50 years, has been overlooked (one thinks of Dufourcq, for example ) .
But Bat Ye’or, in her work which makes use of many of those scholars, but goes far beyond a work of synthesis, relying as well on the testimony of non-Muslims – dhimmis themselves (the chronicle of Arakel of Tabriz, for example), and Western diplomats, and the historical record is filled out – so that the scandalous scanting of Muslim intolerance, Muslim aggression toward all non-Muslims, Muslim indifference to all pre-Islamic or non-Islamic civilizations.
Here we see that the real debate on Islam in Britain has never happened, and that the laws restricting free speech are designed to ensure that the real debate never goes ahead. The fact that the media know nothing about the real nature either of Islam, or the threat to us from extremists within Islam, and instead keep repeating the mantra that ‘Diversity is Good’ does not make it true.
The fact that the liberal Elite have allowed certain people to reside in our nation who would extinguish our way of life through violence and murder in the name of Multi-Culturalism is the modern equivalent of allowing the Nazis and Hitler or Stalin and the Communists to enter our nation and set up the Third Reich or a British Soviet Union with the consent of the government and the liberal elite itself.
****Livingstone – friend of terrorism ****
The spectacle of the terrorists’ friend, Ken Livingstone, weeping his tears for the victims of the bombings was as sickening a sight I have seen for years. This vile and loathsome reptile is a friend of Gerry Adams and the Islamic apologist for suicide bombers Dr al-Qaradawi, who Ken invited to London last year.
His pathetic crocodile tears and weeping and wailing about defending diversity in London does not sit well with his past support for the IRA and their racist and sectarian terrorist agenda to ethnically cleanse all ‘Brits’ and ‘English Loyalists’ from Northern Ireland. It seems that old Red Ken can defend diversity in London, but support ethnic cleansing in Ireland all at the same time. We knew he was an idiot; it just never got to be so public before.
The most revolting shedding of crocodile tears after the bombing came from Gerry Adams himself .On the Sinn Fein website he wrote “ Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams has condemned the bomb attacks in London this morning. Mr. Adams has sent a message of sympathy and solidarity to the British Prime Minister Tony Blair and to the Mayor of London Ken Livingstone. Mr. Adams said: "I condemn the bomb attacks in London this morning. I have sent a message of sympathy and solidarity to Mr. Blair and the London Mayor Ken Livingstone. On behalf of Sinn Féin I offer my sincere condolences to the victims and the families of those killed and injured and to the people of London”.
Coming from a vile, murdering, Republican scumbag criminal with the blood of three thousand people on his hands and the terrorist organisation he leads this was disgusting. This was opportunism of the vilest kind, and the British media did not even report it. His mate Ken Livingstone probably supported Gerry Adams’ crocodile tears, as it seems did all the war criminals in Blair’s government, the IRA and Al Qaeda that were all shedding them over the past week.
Multi-culturalism the problem.
London’s diversity is Britain’s danger. The Multi-Cultural nightmare of Britain is the sea in which the terrorist can swim. The era of the liberal Consensus is over. The time when deluded and apathetic liberals, New Left fascists, tolerance freaks and diversity nazis, sycophantic vicars and various other white witless female versions of Charles Dickens Mrs.Jellyby were listened too is over. They should all now be despised for the utter idiots they all are and for the danger they have placed us all in.
‘The World in One City’ is the paradise of the terrorist and the Babylon of the bomber. Multi-Culturalism and liberal tolerance have allowed a fascist death cult to grow in our nation and place us all at risk. Unless we extirpate both the liberals and the terrorists from our society and all those who support them, either in the Muslim community and the white liberal community, then we are going to lose this war.
We now have a choice – either the Union Flag and Liberty, or the Flag of Islam and the Koran.
All material published on these pages represents the personal views of the individual columnists and should not be taken to represent official BNP policy, which is decided by the Chairman after a period of ongoing consultation and discussion at the annual conference each November.