The Implications of considering Quran the Creator or Created (khaliq or makhlooq)

[diwana]

Re: The Implications of considering Quran the Creator or Created (khaliq or makhlooq)

@khoji

Do you think some of the ayahs in Quran may not be applicable today, or need a different interpretation than earlier Muslims?

This is the reason I started the thread. I wanted to see how far the implications of this debate go.

I am not sure what was posted above had anything to do with what you are saying in this post.

There is no implication from this debate which will bring to the result you mean or are expecting.

Quran is not a live form.

Quran cannot be khaliq or makhlooq, and your post # 10 was a mile off logic when you said it could be creation or part of creator.

Quran as it is believed, is he word of almighty delivered by his angel to the prophet SAW. Nohing less nothing more. Why make it complicated?

What implication will it have on people who are suppose to simply read it and undersand it?

Now as far as your quesion of difference in time and interpretaion, it is another separate issue.

Why not directly ask that question without going in to a long totally unrelated rout?