The four who would rule

Cyril telling it like it is..

Brilliant, bold, incisive, harsh and spot on with his analysis of the four musketeers, NS, Zardari, Imran and Raheel

Although General Raheel and Director General ISPR have repeatedly insisted the former will not seek an extension, THREE MONTHS is a long time in the life of a Pakistani politician…26th Nov to be precise. It will be good for COAS to stay in his uniform and retire with dignity and respect and not lose all the goodwill and respect that he has earned (via Zarb-e-Azb) since assuming office.

Is there another twist in this saga?

Perhaps if the pampered politicians (both government and opposition) did what they were elected for in the first place and focused solely on improving their performance and governance rather than abusing their VIP status (unnecessary spending on lavish VVIP protocol and other perks) or indulging in empty slogans or rhetoric or trading insults at each other, then there will be no need for anybody to turn to the ‘Boys’ for help.

http://www.dawn.com/news/1269844/the-four-who-would-rule

WE can’t stop the squawking and bleating and barking and squealing that’s about to come, but we sure can tell them what we think of them. So, by way of semi-catharsis, a word to the four who would rule us all.
Nawaz – Really? I mean, really? You have a damaged ticker, fine. You’re miffed some folk think you’d fake heart problems to distract from your Panama woes – fair enough.
Some of us would be annoyed if we were in your place. But someone’s gotta tell you: you’re slipping into African-dictator realm of out-of-touchness.
It’s not the special plane. It’s not the shopping around for fancy watches and luxe suits. It’s not the dining out in London. It’s all of it. All the time.
To hell with whether the pics of you wandering and shopping and eating around London are new or old, fake or real.
You’ve got a problem when there’re more grainy videos and dodgy pics of you doing rich-man stuff floating around than even the shiny, slickly produced stuff of you meeting ordinary Pakistanis.
And it never ends. You’ve already managed to botch your return, even before you’ve returned.
Try explaining to anyone – Pakistani, doctor, idiot, rich or poor – how it makes sense for the family to jet out to spend Eid with you only for the lot of you to fly back home THE DAY AFTER EID. Are we only good enough to be ruled, but not posh enough to spend Eid with? You’ve got a London problem and because you have a London problem, Pakistan has a Nawaz problem.
We get it: it’s nice there. You can relax and not worry about the ISI bugging your home. You can chat with friends and strategise with your team. It’s probably nice to be relatively anonymous again.
And you’re probably happy knowing that you’re still ahead of the pack for the next election. There’s only one thing better than three-term PM: four-term PM.
But when you’re sliding towards winning an election while losing the people, you’re in that most unwise of realms: an out-of-touch winner. Pull it together, man.

**
Imran – oh, dear. Where to begin?

OK, let’s try this. We get it, you’ve got some loopy ideas: Taliban are misguided, Fata was milk and honey; we should hang crooked politicians and give militants a hug.
But you’re not exactly alone. Nawaz didn’t want Zarb-i-Azb and doesn’t want his Punjab disturbed. Asif and the ANP gave us Nizam-i-Adl.
Plus, it doesn’t really matter what you think about the Taliban and Fata: the boys have made their decision and you’re not going to change their minds. Small mercies, then.
But must you be so offensively ignorant?
Some loons in your KP government thought it smart to give Samiul Haq some cash. Maybe it had to do something with the PTI’s rivalry with Samiul Haq’s rival Fazlur Rehman. Maybe they just thought it a good idea.
What was definitely a wretched idea was your response when asked. You could have left it at, I don’t know why and I need more information. Or said, we need to reform madressahs and this is a part of that.
Y’know, like your freaked-out minders desperately spun afterwards and got you to say later. And that’s the problem.
Not that you have minders to attend to your mishaps. Not that you spoke your mind. BUT BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT YOU SOUND LIKE WHEN YOU SPEAK YOUR MIND.
A gazillion interviews and questions later and you still can’t figure out the difference between a terrible answer and an OK one.
There’s the stupid way and there’s the Imran way. Can we have a less of the two being the same, please?
**
Zardari – just because you’ve gone quiet, doesn’t mean we’ve forgotten about you, oh no.
Look, we get it. You don’t give a toss what anyone thinks. You are what you are, you’ll do what you want and the rest of us just have to suck it up. But that’s not it.

You love collecting property like Monopoly squares, you adore shiny towers and you live like a billionaire. We’ve got used to it.
But could you just act – just a teeny, tiny bit – like you’re still responsible for Sindh? Because, y’know, you are?
Yes, yes, we know that the boys have taken over Karachi and they’ve squeezed your inner circle. By all means, fight that fight.
But Sindh is not Balochistan. It’s not some godforsaken backwater. It’s got Karachi and 50 million people. And it doesn’t deserve this.
That Pathankot attack? Two of the four came from your interior Sindh. The great jihad penetration into northern Sindh may be controlled from elsewhere, but it’s happening on your watch.
Karachi? It’s about more than political murders and militant hideouts. It’s about one of the world’s largest cities imploding into a vast civic nightmare.
If you can’t bring yourself to anything right, try doing one less wrong, governance-killing thing every month. You may be surprised by the effect. Have a heart, man.

Raheel – oh, don’t act like you don’t know why you’re on this list.
Saint Raheel. The man who could be king forever, walking away from it all, right at his peak.
But here we are – again: a few months from a scheduled exit, speculation is rising, in the middle of a simmering political crisis, of decisions being reconsidered and of ways of keeping the crown.
If you could say it in Jan, say it again now: I’m going home, folk. Done. Decided. Written in stone.
Whoosh. Just like that the conspiracy bubble would disappear and we could get on with trying to become a constitutional realm.
Do the right thing, general. Look within, not at the other three.

Re: The four who would rule

khoob class li chaaron ki

well done Cyril

Re: The four who would rule

Do the right thing, general. Look within,
Today

Re: The four who would rule

Well said! As an ardent PMLN supporter, I am myself annoyed by Mian Sahab's actions. I am actually very annoyed with Foreign trips by both PM and The COAS. While I can forgive PM as he is elected, COAS is unacceptable. The six trips to US uninvited did wonders like no more F 16 so why bother. Great article. Politicans cry foul on Army but they need to get their act together. Army has weapons and Propaganda machine, stop fueling their propaganda.

As for Saint Raheel,What has he done that he Is not paid to do so! we make Saints just for doing their jobs? Rogue Army and Rogue Generals are cancer.

Re: The four who would rule

lolz at this great journalism. Make a speculation about COAS and start building argument on that.

Re: The four who would rule

It is not mere speculation.

Ominous!
http://www.dawn.com/news/1270214/mysterious-banners-urging-coas-to-take-over-put-up-across-country

Although to be fair intelligence agencies have sent a report to the provincial government

http://www.dawn.com/news/1270297/banners-requesting-coas-to-stay-removed-in-rawalpindi

Re: The four who would rule

That refers to the civilian intelligence agencies, not Army intelligence.

Re: The four who would rule

^ Point noted

Re: The four who would rule

Are you trying to present that speculation as fact with these “mysterious” banners? or you mean COAS is behind that “move on” organization?

Re: The four who would rule

I don't know who is behind it but something is cooking..

My own view is that Raheel will neither take over nor seek an extension.

Re: The four who would rule

This is all drama for just an extension
His last statement was to please US .
[RIGHT]میرےآقادلادےایکسٹنشن مجھے
میں درپہ سوالی آیاہوں
میراکوئی نہیں ہےتیرےسوا
مجھےنذرکرم کی بھیک…[/RIGHT]

**Samaa-News @Samaa_Alertz****The #WhiteHouse welcomes the statement of coas #GeneralRaheelSharif.Details: http://www.samaa.tv/international/2016/07/us-welcomes-coas-statement-on-afghanistan/ … **

Re: The four who would rule

This is the problem with these Rogue Generals and Our nation. We have made Raheel hero for just doing his job! Nothing special just his basic job without regard of how his institution gave birth to Cancer we call Taliban and now that Raheel feel he is a God he is doing drama to get extention just because things cant work if he wont be there. If Army is that good than it will be fine under new COAS and system. Blood sucking rogue Generals!

Re: The four who would rule

Agreed. Not only some politicians but the media is mainly to blame for spoiling the army

Even an esteemed paper like Dawn is not exempt from blame and constantly gives undue coverage to every petty military-related news and event

I once asked them the Q,

"Why does every bloody (yes I wrote bloody) corps commanders conference make front page news in the Dawn? Isn't it part of their routine? Isn't periodically assessing the security situation in the country their job? I can understand if something really important is discussed in the meeting or shared with the media."

Suffice to say my comment wasn't published by Dawn!

Re: The four who would rule

Who the hell you are to tell the nation how to regard Raheel sharif? Its funny you can forgive NS for his useless foreign visits but have issue with Raheel. Remember, its same people that voted for NS that respect Raheel.

Re: The four who would rule

My view is simple

Nawaz Sharif should be allowed to complete his term. Imran, Qadri, PPP and the army should not act like spoiled brats. Constructive criticism is fine but the opposition incl. PPP and PTI should raise issues in parliament rather than thru dharna or street protests. Most people have no appetite for such nonsense. National Assembly jana tau yeh party leaders apni tauheen samajhtey hain....NS is the same.

Let the judicial commission and courts deal with the pyjama leaks

Yes governance could be better (but still better than the non-existent last PPP government), Yes NS hasn't really delivered on key areas of health and education (incl. reformation of madrasas) or shunned nepotism or VVIP culture or created many jobs during the past 3 years but in no other country is the opposition constantly agitating or trying to unseat an elected government. And in no other country is the army treated as a holy cow by the media and other opportunists just for doing their job!

And then the same people start crying and complaining when the army overstays its welcome.... We are an impatient nation.

Re: The four who would rule

And who the bloody hell are you ? I don’t polish boot and I don’tlie and mince words. Its my opinion and quite rightful to question any one andevery one who says Than you Raheel? For What I ask? For doing the job he isPaid to ? For launching an operation that should have been launched 10 yearsago, that too after Civilian Govt completely took ownership. For what else Thank you, Please enlighten me here. This is depth of being shamelessfor us if we are thanking Raheel for simply doing his job (yes better thanothers before him).

Oh may be thankyou for coming to the US uninvited 6 timesand losing F16s or may be because of this http://www.dawn.com/news/1270717/vicious-criticism-of-pakistan-by-us-congress-panel

or thank for your peace in Baluchistan, where warlordsare giving up their weapons to Civilians Dr. Shafi and Sana Zehri. Thank you for WHAT ?

Re: The four who would rule

well yelling doesn’t make your argument strong either. the US did not give us F-16 because RS visited US?.
and if you argue on the basis of doing a job for what he is paid for you can look around yourself and see who really does.
at least RS did what he is paid for. there are more ‘kanjars’ in pakistan who don’t even do that. How many bills did this parliament pass? and how many were for public? how many cases were taken up by the PAC? how many were resolved?.
respect is earned. and it is earned when you deliver, not by talking loud :slight_smile:
think!!