SC bahi,
Is reading comprehension is an issue. Go back and see. My post clearly gives different views and then focuses on
Iqbal’s view.
As per Iqbal (had you read the whole Shikwa) would know that after this shair, the next one clearly points out that
Ayaaz was a slave.
It was common back then to have boy-Slaves. What you do with your boy-slave is immaterial.
Because this comment was about “Why a Namazi Muslim like mahomood would keep a boy-slave”?
Got it?