The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Seven years on from the attack on Fallujah, the city is suffering from Hiroshima like effects of infant mortality, cancer and birth defects. Is this a case of more bad apples? Or has the US Army been using weapons that had some unfortunate long-term collateral damage?

http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00419/p28-fallujah_419262t.jpg

Toxic legacy of US assault on Fallujah ‘worse than Hiroshima’

By Patrick Cockburn
Saturday, 24 July 2010

Dramatic increases in infant mortality, cancer and leukaemia in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, which was bombarded by US Marines in 2004, exceed those reported by survivors of the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, according to a new study.

Iraqi doctors in Fallujah have complained since 2005 of being overwhelmed by the number of babies with serious birth defects, ranging from a girl born with two heads to paralysis of the lower limbs. They said they were also seeing far more cancers than they did before the battle for Fallujah between US troops and insurgents.

Their claims have been supported by a survey showing a four-fold increase in all cancers and a 12-fold increase in childhood cancer in under-14s. Infant mortality in the city is more than four times higher than in neighbouring Jordan and eight times higher than in Kuwait.

Dr Chris Busby, a visiting professor at the University of Ulster and one of the authors of the survey of 4,800 individuals in Fallujah, said it is difficult to pin down the exact cause of the cancers and birth defects. He added that “to produce an effect like this, some very major mutagenic exposure must have occurred in 2004 when the attacks happened”.

US Marines first besieged and bombarded Fallujah, 30 miles west of Baghdad, in April 2004 after four employees of the American security company Blackwater were killed and their bodies burned. After an eight-month stand-off, the Marines stormed the city in November using artillery and aerial bombing against rebel positions. US forces later admitted that they had employed white phosphorus as well as other munitions.

In the assault US commanders largely treated Fallujah as a free-fire zone to try to reduce casualties among their own troops. British officers were appalled by the lack of concern for civilian casualties. “During preparatory operations in the November 2004 Fallujah clearance operation, on one night over 40 155mm artillery rounds were fired into a small sector of the city,” recalled Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster, a British commander serving with the American forces in Baghdad.

He added that the US commander who ordered this devastating use of firepower did not consider it significant enough to mention it in his daily report to the US general in command. Dr Busby says that while he cannot identify the type of armaments used by the Marines, the extent of genetic damage suffered by inhabitants suggests the use of uranium in some form. He said: “My guess is that they used a new weapon against buildings to break through walls and kill those inside.”

The survey was carried out by a team of 11 researchers in January and February this year who visited 711 houses in Fallujah. A questionnaire was filled in by householders giving details of cancers, birth outcomes and infant mortality. Hitherto the Iraqi government has been loath to respond to complaints from civilians about damage to their health during military operations.

Researchers were initially regarded with some suspicion by locals, particularly after a Baghdad television station broadcast a report saying a survey was being carried out by terrorists and anybody conducting it or answering questions would be arrested. Those organising the survey subsequently arranged to be accompanied by a person of standing in the community to allay suspicions.

The study, entitled “Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005-2009”, is by Dr Busby, Malak Hamdan and Entesar Ariabi, and concludes that anecdotal evidence of a sharp rise in cancer and congenital birth defects is correct. Infant mortality was found to be 80 per 1,000 births compared to 19 in Egypt, 17 in Jordan and 9.7 in Kuwait. The report says that the types of cancer are “similar to that in the Hiroshima survivors who were exposed to ionising radiation from the bomb and uranium in the fallout”.

Researchers found a 38-fold increase in leukaemia, a ten-fold increase in female breast cancer and significant increases in lymphoma and brain tumours in adults. At Hiroshima survivors showed a 17-fold increase in leukaemia, but in Fallujah Dr Busby says what is striking is not only the greater prevalence of cancer but the speed with which it was affecting people.

Of particular significance was the finding that the sex ratio between newborn boys and girls had changed. In a normal population this is 1,050 boys born to 1,000 girls, but for those born from 2005 there was an 18 per cent drop in male births, so the ratio was 850 males to 1,000 females. The sex-ratio is an indicator of genetic damage that affects boys more than girls. A similar change in the sex-ratio was discovered after Hiroshima.

The US cut back on its use of firepower in Iraq from 2007 because of the anger it provoked among civilians. But at the same time there has been a decline in healthcare and sanitary conditions in Iraq since 2003. The impact of war on civilians was more severe in Fallujah than anywhere else in Iraq because the city continued to be blockaded and cut off from the rest of the country long after 2004. War damage was only slowly repaired and people from the city were frightened to go to hospitals in Baghdad because of military checkpoints on the road into the capital.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Everybody knows that the siege of Fallujah was in fact war crimes. They used DU weapons and indiscriminately killed Civilians. The only problem is that the reporters on the ground were American and did not report on it.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

I have talked to army people (there is actually a forum, though right winger, on the web) and they said that using DU weapons would be counterproductive and expensive, as the reason DU rounds are used is to penetrate thick armor like that of tanks.

It leaves possibility of use of chemical & bio weapons by al-qaeda or the coalition but I haven't heard about it. White phosphorus causes painful burns, as happened in Gaza, but i don't think it causes cancer cases like this.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Word.

Yeah your quite right DU or more correctly for those who dont know... Depleted Uranium is nasty stuff. I have personally worked with it closely and can say that in terms of comparrison a golf ball size amount of DU can wiegh over a 2 Kilo's for it's one of the heaviest things you can fire and is effective at turning Tanks and Bunkers into matchwood.

DU definatley cuases cancer after long term exposure,( I begin to perspire heavily as I write this) those of you who can remember it's use in large scale Tank battles of the 1991 Gulf War the original Operation Desert Storm will remember that battles like Khafji in Saudi Arabia were decided by the Coalitions use of DU shells. Many of the Veterans from that War on both sides continue to live with the after effects but unlike Khafji Falluja was a smaller battleground and most of the victims were indeed Civillian.

Falluja was the Stalingrad of the current Iraq war Operation Iraqi freedom (the Freedom is anything but real) and both sides commited horrendous attrocities however the US should have kept the higher Moral ground and not used what I would call Inhumane tactics. There were other options than to using such heavy handed tactics.

With regards to the use of White Phosphorus imagine a having your flesh eaten away and thats the effect White Phosphorous has it burns you to the bone... I knew a poor fellow who had a n accident with a type seventy seven grenade leaking on his hand... they amputated his arm at the elbow.

White Phosphorous is a chemical weapon though and DU is Nuclear. While we can see the effects of Phosphoruos almost instantly as it burns without ceasing and is made worse by oxygen so even water will make it worse... we still dont know the full effects of DU.

The World should get rid of these nasty weapons, if only wars were still fought with Melee weapons... or better still such disputes decided without wars at all... but one lives in hope.

Fallujah should not be forgotten though it was a war crime. I am not in support of the Extremists in Fallujah either there were cases of the Millitants torturing US soldiers too but niether side should have done what they did and in the end the Civilians suffered the most.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

No Al Qaeda in Fallujah. Never mentioned anywhere in any news paper of repute. The ones in Fallujah were Iraqis.

You can't blockade a city, place it under siege and then use DU weapons and not expect this to occur. The media blackouts of what happened in Fallujah is one of the most amazing things in modern media history.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

There was no tanks or APCs in used by iraqi insurgents so why would US take a chance with its own troops handling such munitions? Don't tell me that it was iraqis that brutally murdered those contractors, though it does show the lengths the US went considering they were just contractors.

It was an army assault (3rd infantry if I am right?) backed up by supporting units of the marine expeditionary unit, though Marines are remembered for Fallujah as they took heavy casualties relative to what they absorbed in other places. It makes me wonder about another thing, that is if US artillery blasting the buildings released asbestos and other chemicals like the rubble of WTC caused air population that resulted in cancer for many of the first responders on the scene after 9/11.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

No, we should not condemn the use of DU. Pakistan uses depleted uranium in in its munitions and a ban on those would harm our army's ability to defend the people against armoured attack.

The alternative to DU is tungsten, a very expensive metal that does not burn like DU does to cause secondary damage following a penetrating hit. Right now, Pakistan gets DU for free as a waste product of our nuclear reactors.

Condemning DU and banning it would force Pakistan's army to spend vastly more money on tunsgten munitions that are not as effective as what we use today.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Your right there Fallujah was mostly an Iraqi fight all along. In fact Al Qaeda thanks to Sadam had a very low presence if any in Iraq. After the toppling of Sadam Al Qaeda came fying in by the minute.

Correct.

Fallujah was a city fight and it was a bloody battle followed by brutal siege and final onslaught.

DU is not used just against tanks but to completely destroy strong points such as a city Anti Tank weapons make excellent City busters too the Vietcong, Russains, Afghans and even the British use anti tank weapons for destroying things that are not just Tanks range of targets include Bunkers and even bridges. DU was used to not only clear the houses but to make them uninhabitable to anyone wanting to re-take them afterwards the Americans did not want an Oosterbeek. Co-incidentally the First US assaults were bogged down in the street fights that followed so instead of getting stuck in a full on Stalingrad situation the Americans decided to bomb the hell out of anything and everything a tactic they have employed since Hiroshima.

It's a cowardly tactic really when you analyse it closely they just dont have the power to slug it out in a City fight.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Right asbestos. What about the birth defects and high infant mortality levels?

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

You make a fair point, but DU for all it's armour stopping benefits is a Devils element. Trouble is what works on Tanks works on homes and there should be an outright ban on it's use for City fights. As for Armour stopping power DU is not the only option, terrain is one of the worst problems that face Armour and couple that with a good knowledge of Armour tactics and you will realise that Armour is as vulnerable as any other weapon particularly in the modern age. Turkey has the Worlds best Anti Tank weapon that far exceeds even the US models and it relies not on stopping power but location of the hit... istead of just battering at armour the Turkish shaped charges are guided onto the softest parts of Tanks and work brilliantly. :)

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

There were no armoured attacks to contend with in Fallujah.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Thats a reason why nobody in the UK uses asbestos for Building purposes anymore.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

To my knowledge asbestos causes cancer from inhalation, and specific types of cancer. You cant just attribute everything to asbestos.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Click at your own peril.

http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/story/watch/id/600687/n/Iraq-s-Deadly-Legacy

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

True very true.

But forgive my bluntness what has Asbestos got to do with the Fallujah case, dont mean to be Patronizing just trying to figure out what your saying? :konfused:

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

It was wrt this:

Its a defence I've read elsewhere and its absolutely stupid.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Right I see what you mean... Theres simply no way anyone can defend the attrocities at Fallujah.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

I thought the purpose of the thread was to determine the cause of cancer in Fallujah?

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Cancer is one of the issues, along with birth defects and high infant mortality. Asbestos causes specific types of cancer from inhalation, typically lung cancer, not girls born with two heads etc.

Re: The Exceptional Case of Fallujah

Asbestos is one irritant among thousands of chemicals found in buildings.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/10/health/main5228710.shtml