thanks for replying, I thought you wont reply this time.. 
*Your rebuttals aren’t nearly as clever as you think they are. Trust me, debating you is like talking to a child.
so this is the best logical answer you came up with for my dumb question?? and still believing it’s a FACT.. 
before I answer.. I must tell you that when **“hypothesis and theories are accepted by scientists unanimously only then it becomes a Fact”..
Shabash. You must have been doing some minimal reading on science then. Now, tell me when I said that scientific theories were facts? Because I said scientific theories were well substantiated explanations. That is not saying it is a fact, nor it is implying it is a fact.
**
now my dumb*** answer to your provided link..
Dr. Carl Woese who discovered third domain of life “Archaea” and is a very important evolutionary biologist says, “Life is a web, it’s not a tree of life”.. and he goes against Darwinism saying “He believes in Neo Lemark’s Theory Of Evolution”..
Dr. Richard Dawkins of Oxford University who also believes in Lemark’s says, “We must acknowledge the possibility that new Facts may come to light which will force our successors of the twenty-first century to abandon Darwan’s theory and modify it beyond recognition”..
Dr. Henry and Dr. Michael Roos says, “There are wholes and discrepencies in Darwin’s theory”..**
This “rebuttal” you provided proves you really do not have a clue. Where did I wholeheartedly put my faith into DARWIN’s version of the theory? Of course it will be full of holes and have places for improvement, this was his way of explaining the phenomena he saw in the Galapagos Islands. The theory of Evolution has come a long way since then. You seem to think I treat science the way you treat religion. In my previous reply I even said I do not have a dogmatic relationship with science. If you read your own source, it describes a situation where they say what I have alluded to. Also, how does your source supposedly debunk the idea that humans, apes, and other primates have a common ancestor? It did none of that. Your “rebuttal” is pitiful.
**
Hence proved, that wasnt a dumb*** question..
**Yes, it was. **
but this aint a point.. the point I observed is you hate religion, and thinks it’s an old school..
**I do not hate religion. I see it as something that can potentially be used impair critical thinking skills. **
and you even started to hate me I guess, or atleast behaving badly because of the difference in opinion..
These are your own projections LMAO. You got your little feelings hurt because I said your question was a dumbass question and now you doing drama bazi acting like I am treating you like an inferior. Amazing.
this is what science teach you to do?? Science teaches you to use words like Dumb— and Laughing your ------- — —??
I never saw any science student doing this.. they are so patient in behaving and listening to others.. think about it too.. 
**Nah, science didn’t teach me to use the word dumbass. It did teach me not to blindly hold on to ideologies, though.
**