Re: The Balance of Science and Religion
thanks for replying, I thought you wont reply this time.. 
so this is the best logical answer you came up with for my dumb*** question?? and still believing it’s a FACT.. 
before I answer.. I must tell you that when “hypothesis and theories are accepted by scientists unanimously only then it becomes a Fact”..
now my dumb*** answer to your provided link..
Dr. Carl Woese who discovered third domain of life “Archaea” and is a very important evolutionary biologist says, “Life is a web, it’s not a tree of life”.. and he goes against Darwinism saying “He believes in Neo Lemark’s Theory Of Evolution”..
Dr. Richard Dawkins of Oxford University who also believes in Lemark’s says, “We must acknowledge the possibility that new Facts may come to light which will force our successors of the twenty-first century to abandon Darwan’s theory and modify it beyond recognition”..
Dr. Henry and Dr. Michael Roos says, “There are wholes and discrepencies in Darwin’s theory”..
Hence proved, that wasnt a dumb*** question.. but this aint a point.. the point I observed is you hate religion, and thinks it’s an old school.. and you even started to hate me I guess, or atleast behaving badly because of the difference in opinion.. this is what science teach you to do?? Science teaches you to use words like Dumb— and Laughing your ------- — —?? I never saw any science student doing this.. they are so patient in behaving and listening to others.. think about it too.. 