Why are you all falling over yourselves to defend Hindu radicals? Or do you think it's okay for others to be radicals, but should it be someone who has a muslim name, it's a threat to world all of a sudden?
Why the double-standards? Condemn them all, or justify them all. Why the selective reasoning?
Why? Oh, 9/11, London, Madrid.
If the Hindus start exporting terror to other major cities of the world, I suspect that they will be roundly condemed too. Every country has it's percentage of whack-jobs. That is an internal matter. When the problem leads to bombings of western gatherings in Bali, embassies world wide, hotels and trains, it becomes different.
I will condemn Norwegian terror when it leaves Norway.