Terminology to distort Muslim thinking

There is now an effort by secular governments, media, educational establishments and fake representatives of the Muslim community to further secularize Muslims and the Muslim world.

The secular governments and media are trying to indoctrinate the masses with a ridiculous and baseless conception that Islam is not a way of life, Islam is not a system and Islam has no political alternative. This is because they label those who want to revive the Islamic way of life with emotive words by which they intend to derive an emotional response from the listeners who have also been programmed with the negative connotations of those words in order to reject those being attributed to them. E.g. :-

‘Extremist’ = Intended to invoke the idea of irrational excess as opposed to ‘civilised moderation’ but in reality means ‘A Muslim who follows the whole Quran’

‘Fundamentalist’ = Indicates a person who has stone-age values and an abnormal literal interpretation of ancient religious scriptures and rejection of other ideologies but in reality means ‘A Muslim whose beliefs manifest in his actions and does not contradict his beliefs by compromise’

Fanatic’ = Invokes the vision of someone Muslim who submits to Islamic law rather than submits to desires and oppression of people

‘Islamist’ = ‘An enemy ideological and political Muslim who has deviated from the mainstream ‘true’ Islam of love and peace in reality A term which only has relevance today due to large amounts of people calling themselves ‘Muslim’ but who do not submit to Allah at all. A real Muslim as opposed to Muslim by name alone

‘Terrorist’ = ‘Someone who uses acts of violence on civilian targets to achieve political objectives’ and more recently ‘An individual who wants to kill for the joy of killing or the joy of creating fear out of an irrational hatred’ but in reality means ‘Anyone who physically resists neo-colonial invasion, State mass murder and State Weapons of Mass Destruction, State torture’ Thus we have seen Muslims of Palestine, Iraq, Chechnya and Afghanistan all labelled by secular governments and media as ‘terrorists’ even though they are all subject to a murderous occupation.

Islam needs to be implemented comprehensively to fulfil its leading role. Islam is not a personal religion whose relevance is limited to personal prayer and morals and whose place is only in the mosque and home.

Rather Islam is a belief from which complete guidance and a complete system of life emanate. Thus the law of Islam are not concerning belief, personal worship and spirituality but also ruling, social, economic, judicial, educational and foreign policy. The evidence of this is throughout the textual sources of Islam as well as manifest through Islamic history and the current reality.

How do people think there are Muslims all over the world today? Do they not understand that Islam was a system of life that spread in the form a system around the world?

Re: Terminology to distort Muslim thinking

^^

If Islam was a complete way of life why do we still have scholars who give out contradictory fatwas. Why is it not being implemented in the so called Islamic countries..

Re: Terminology to distort Muslim thinking

Thanks for replying. Your question is kind of confused…

First if all, please concentrate on the bold word, “was”. If you consider “was” and not “is” then you are referring to past.

Next, you are saying why are scholars giving contradivtory fatwas.

In the next sentence, you are asking why it is BEING IMPLEMENTED in so called Islamic countries.

Islam IS a complete way of life. It is we who are rejecting it. Islam was, is and will be what it is in reality. We cannot attribute our shortcoming in following it to some sort of criticism towards Islam. Islam’s strength is clear when we study it in a historical perspective. Islam arose as a new civilisation, collided with those existing already and shatterred them. For example, Roman Empire, and Persian Empire…

Now why Scholars give contradicting fatwas, Islam does not teach Muslims to divide among themselves. Islam does not teach sectarianism. It is the people who have divided into sects and Firqas and they give Fatwas according to their own wishes. It does not mean anything is wrong with Islam !!!

When you say sholars, I am compelled to ask whom do you regard as schloars? Many of them are not scholars even. If a scholar sitting in West does not give fatwa on Jihad just that he does not want to be expelled from the country, it does not change the reality that Islam emphasizes Jihad. If a scholar sitting in India gives a Fatwa on Jihad, it does not make him a terrorist either because Islam emphasizez on Jihad. So where do you see the problem exactly? With Islam or with the Scholars? Choice is yours…

Implementation of Islam. Dude, Islam is just facing a period of recession and Muslims are paying for their deeds for betraying Allah. Once they will be punished enough (Which yet has to happen) then you’ll see, Ilsam will be implemented all over the world. Does that satisfy you. :slight_smile: