Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles.....................
that's right. There are those who thing morality is Law+values. Others who think morality=LAw.
Values are subjective...hence we have to let it be personal and not sit in judgment.
Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles.....................
No batsman is required walk and i doubt if Tendulkar would have walked if it was a crunch match. However Ponting has always been trying to ride the moral high horse, arguing with umpires that if his fielder says he caught it, batsman should be given out. And the famous incident where he asked an Indian journalist to better leave than questioning his integrity.
Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles.....................
that's right. There are those who thing morality is Law+values. Others who think morality=LAw.
Values are subjective...hence we have to let it be personal and not sit in judgment.
If somebody does something that is unsportsmanlike and cheap then we have all the right to point it out.. regardless of what his own personal opinion is on the issue!
Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles.....................
I can see Ricky Ponting metamorphosing into Ian Chappell when he leaves cricket
Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles.....................
Asif.. punter will be worse!!!!!!
Re: Tendulkar,Ponting at opposite poles…
Now Ponting claims that,
“Sachin wouldn’t have walked had he known umpire’s decision”.
Of course, he is assuming that Tendulkar thinks like him.