Tendulkar faces the unthinkable after Lord's failure

http://sports.yahoo.com/m/sk/news/reuters/20020731/reu-indiatendulkar.html

**He is widely regarded as the world’s best batsman but after another overseas test defeat, India is beginning to consider the hitherto unthinkable – does Sachin Tendulkar choke when it matters most?

Tendulkar was bowled through the gate for 12 attempting an uppish drive against paceman Matthew Hoggard at Lord’s on Sunday, just when India were hoping he could help them save the first test.

The problem, experts and former players say, is that it wasn’t a one-off.

“One more defeat on foreign soil. One more time when Sachin Tendulkar failed to produce a quality innings in adversity,” said the Hindustan Times.

“Tendulkar’s greatness as a complete batsman is on test. He is prolific but not decisive.” **

The 29-year-old said in an interview earlier this year that he was disappointed at not winning test matches when the team had to chase challenging fourth-innings totals.

**“I have been disappointed with myself… I have to learn to finish tests,” he said.

His six-ball duck with India needing 396 to win in the fourth innings at Adelaide in 1999-2000, and a breezy but ultimately fruitless 86 in a similar situation at Jamaica in May are cases in point. **

SECOND-INNINGS AVERAGE

**Tendulkar’s second innings average over the last three years is 31.9 – with no centuries – against an impressive career mark of 56.96 in 97 tests.

Of his 29 centuries only eight, two of them overseas, have resulted in Indian victories. **

The only time Tendulkar came close to lifting India to a test win single-handedly was against Pakistan in Madras in 1999 when he struck a masterful 137 but his dismissal 17 runs from the 271-run target sparked an astonishing lower-order collapse that saw India lose by 12 runs.

“Sachin is the greatest batsman of this era. But there has been a problem with him in the big show and he knows it,” former test medium pacer Atul Wassan said.

“He perhaps puts too much pressure on himself because he feels he has to win big matches and prove his critics wrong. That doesn’t help.”

**Tendulkar can be compared with Brian Lara, the other great batsman of his era. The West Indian is well known for his match-winning feats. In 1999 at Barbados he hit 153 not out, bringing up the last 69 runs with Curtly Ambrose and last-man Courtney Walsh to chase down 308 for a one-wicket win over Australia. **

ENORMOUS EXPECTATIONS

Commentators feel the major reason for Tendulkar’s lack of success in big matches is the enormous weight of expectation.

Seen as a national icon, anything less than a century from him is seen as a failure by millions of his passionate fans.

“No other player suffers so much from pressure of expectation,” former England captain Michael Atherton said.

Newspapers and websites have this week been flooded with letters slamming Tendulkar, something new for the only player spared the wrath of emotional Indian fans over the last decade.

But chief selector Chandu Borde was confident Tendulkar would bounce back in the next three tests to silence his detractors. “I am sure something is waiting to happen. He will get back.”

Wassan added: "Sachin is facing a trial by fire of a kind he hasn’t so far in his career.

“This will be the true test of his character.”


Well, the world is now thinking what the guppies have been saying on this board.

Of his 29 centuries only eight, two of them overseas, have resulted in Indian victories.

The only time Tendulkar came close to lifting India to a test win single-handedly was against Pakistan in Madras in 1999 when he struck a masterful 137 but his dismissal 17 runs from the 271-run target sparked an astonishing lower-order collapse that saw India lose by 12 runs.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/dixsi.gif

AOA

I quite disagree with this article.
I think Sachin is a match winning type of player.

His performance has gone down for the last couple years match winning wise but he is actually won some quite matches for India.

World Cup 92 against Pakistan I think he scored a century or a big knock to win the match for India (I'm not sure but he did batted well in that match)

I think the demand for his responsibility has drastically increased since the ejection of the other 2 main batsman in the team. (Jadeja & Azharuddin)

He is has been put on pressure on so many occaisions like the current English series.

We also have to remember that they guy is just a human and not a century scoring machine and he is just having a bad season like all great players.


The Game Responds:

     *The Game had been screaming out to you shmucks about this all year long. The stupid, biased media couldn't see it before this string of failures in England, but I always knew it; and that is why I always referred to him as an *extremely* overrated batsman. You people are the witnesses; The Game stated all of this a long time ago. Remember when I mentioned Brian Lara's 153 against Australia to prove that he is, indeed, a match winning batsman and Tendulkar is not? Do you see the same reference in the above article or are you blindfolded? I own you shmucks, and you know it. People, That Is All.*

Do you see what The People's ARTIST is painting here?

*The only time Tendulkar came close to lifting India to a test win single-handedly was against Pakistan in Madras in 1999 when he struck a masterful 137 but his dismissal 17 runs from the 271-run target sparked an astonishing lower-order collapse that saw India lose by 12 runs. *

Why to blame him if all the others cud not score 17 runs

Cricket is a team game , not a game of individual


.......
Life is like a piano, What u get out of it depends on how u play it.
.......

Correct, but then why he gets all the praises when India wins afterall its a team game

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

.

Dear cricket sure is a team game but you always need a string to keep pearls attached. Tendulkar is supposed to be that string because he is projected one by Indian media.

Some one has to finish the game sucessfully. There are Great Players and then there are Great Player + Match Winner. Tendulkar is no doubt a Great Player but not the other case.

He Doesn’t - You are blinded by your tendulkar hatred to notice it. I can give you at least 20 examples when India won and the praise went to other guys.

Dear, He is the PEARL - no ordinary string. String is the captain and it is Captain’s duty to hold all the pearls. It’s just that for the first time in last 13 years the pearl is out of shine - Just needs little time with himself and he will be back with his original shine.

If Sachin is no match winner, then no player in the world is Past or present. Once again tell me one player who wins matches for his team single handedly, I can prove sachin is no less.


AK

I just think hes being overanalyzed because of his celebrity status. Tendulkar is a fine batsman...but hes not god..and should be allowed a losing streak. Everyone goes through them. He has accomplished a lot in a very short time.

Everyone here has unanimously declared that Sachin is not a match winner... Point proven... Maybe he ought to retire when the time is good...

If he is not a match winner then who is ?? SHAHID AFRIDI ?? Kyon nahin after all he is the VIV RICHARDS of PAKISTAN

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/biggrin.gif


AK

If he is a match winner, then India should be winning…

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/dixsi.gif

btw, everyone here has declared he is not a match winner… Point Proven…

[quote]
Originally posted by the game:
**The Game Responds:

     *The Game had been screaming out to you shmucks about this all year long. The stupid, biased media couldn't see it before this string of failures in England, but I always knew it; and that is why I always referred to him as an *extremely* overrated batsman. You people are the witnesses; The Game stated all of this a long time ago. Remember when I mentioned Brian Lara's 153 against Australia to prove that he is, indeed, a match winning batsman and Tendulkar is not? Do you see the same reference in the above article or are you blindfolded? I own you shmucks, and you know it. People, That Is All.*

**
[/quote]

That is something that I never doubted you on...

India did win the NW trophy. Chasing 325.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif


AK

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited August 01, 2002).]

[quote]
Originally posted by Spock:
** That is something that I never doubted you on...

**
[/quote]

The Game Responds:

    *I appreciate that;  **Think About It**. People, That Is All.*

Do you see what The People's ARTIST is painting here?

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited August 01, 2002).]

And how much did Tendulkar score in that match? only 14 runs… Thats a match winning score isnt it?

btw, game you ok at the top? everytime something happens, you just come here and start crying how you predicted that 2 years ago…

[This message has been edited by Spock (edited August 02, 2002).]

[quote]
Originally posted by Spock:
** And how much did Tendulkar score in that match? only 14 runs... Thats a match winning score isnt it?
**
[/quote]

That's what I have been telling, India's winning has nothing to do with Sachin's scoring. It's a team game and the team has to play to win the game. Let's see what choices we have here :-

1.Tendulkar scores a century and India looses - he is not a match winner.
2.Tendulkar doesn't score a Century and India wins - He is not a match winner
3.Tendulkar doesn't score a century and India looses - He is not a match winner
4. Tendulkar scores a century and India wins - He is not a match winner(coz it was scored in Subcontinet/Sharjah/etc)
5. Tendulkar scores a Century and India wins - He is not a match winner (coz he scored against Zimbabwe, Australia, SA, KENYA, England, WI etc - which are all weak teams)

To be a match winner He needs to score all the runs required to win - in a LAND called TIMBUKTU.


AK

If he had not made those 14 runs india would have lost the NW final

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

exectly now you are learning good boy !

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

[This message has been edited by BAYWAQOOF (edited August 02, 2002).]