Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer * 23 minutes ago*

                                                WASHINGTON - Congressional leaders announced a deal with the White House Thursday on an economic stimulus package that would give most tax filers refunds of $600 to $1,200, and more if they have children.                                                 

intense negotiations with Republican Leader John A. Boehner and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson — “at the earliest date, so that those rebate checks will be in the mail.”

President Bush praised the agreement in a statement he delivered to reporters at the White House. “This package has the right set of policies and is the right size,” he said.

The rebates, which would go to about 116 million families, had appeal for both Democrats and Republicans. Pelosi’s staff noted that they would include $28 billion in checks to 35 million working families who wouldn’t have been helped by Bush’s original proposal. Republicans, for their part, were pleased that the bulk of the rebates — more than 70 percent, according to an analysis by Congress’ Joint Tax Committee — would go to individuals who pay taxes.

Individuals who pay income taxes would get up to $600, working couples $1,200 and those with children an additional $300 per child under the agreement. Workers who make at least $3,000 but don’t pay taxes would get $300 rebates.

The rebates, expected to go out in June, would cost about $100 billion, aides said. The package also includes close to $50 billion in business tax cuts.

The package would allow businesses to immediately write off 50 percent of purchases of plants and other capital equipment and permit small businesses to write off additional purchases of equipment. A Republican-written provision to allow businesses suffering losses now to reclaim taxes previously paid was dropped.

Pelosi, D-Calif., agreed to drop increases in food stamp and unemployment benefits during a Wednesday meeting in exchange for gaining the rebates of at least $300 for almost everyone earning a paycheck, including those who make too little to pay income taxes.
“I can’t say that I’m totally pleased with the package, but I do know that it will help stimulate the economy. But if it does not, then there will be more to come,” Pelosi said.
Boehner said the agreement “was not easy for the two of us and our respective caucuses.”
“You know, many Americans believe that Washington is broken,” Boehner said. “But I think this agreement and I hope that this agreement will show the American people that we can fix it and will serve to move along other bipartisan agreements that we can have in the future.”
Paulson said he would work with the House and Senate to enact the package as soon as possible, because “speed is of the essence.”

The Treasury Department has already been talking to the IRS about getting the checks out “as quickly as possible, recognizing that the tax filing season is ongoing,” said Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza.
The rebates would phase out gradually for individuals whose income exceeds $75,000 and couples with incomes above $150,000, aides said. Individuals with incomes up to $87,000 and couples up to $174,000 would get partial rebates. The caps are higher for those with children.
The agreement left some lawmakers in both parties with a bitter taste, complaining that their leaders had sacrificed too much in the interest of striking a deal. Many senior Democrats were particularly upset that the package omitted the unemployment extension.
“I do not understand, and cannot accept, the resistance of President Bush and Republican leaders to including an extension of unemployment benefits for those who are without work through no fault of their own,” Rep. Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., the Ways and Means Committee chairman, said in a statement.
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Finance Committee Chairman, said leaving out the unemployment extension was “a mistake,” as he announced plans to craft a separate stimulus package in the Senate starting next week.

Majority Leader Harry Reid said the goal is to send the package to the White House by Feb. 15 for President Bush’s signature. Reid said senators would want to look at add-ons including the unemployment extension and possibly money for highway projects.

Bush has supported larger rebates of $800-$1,600, but his plan would have left out 30 million working households who earn paychecks but don’t make enough to pay income tax, according to calculations by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. An additional 19 million households would receive only partial rebates under Bush’s initial proposal.

To address the mortgage crisis, the package also raises the limits on Federal Housing Administration loans and home mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can purchase to as high as $725,000 in high-cost areas. Those are considerable boosts over the current FHA limit of $362,000 and the $417,000 cap for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s loan purchases.

After a key Wednesday night meeting in which the parameters of an agreement were reached, Pelosi and Boehner spoke again Thursday to cement the accord.

In the talks, Pelosi pressed to make sure tax relief would find its way into the hands of lower-income earners while Boehner pushed to include upper middle-class couples, according to congressional aides.
The package was drawing fire from liberal activists and labor unions upset that proposals to extend unemployment insurance and boost food stamps had been dropped. Many Democratic lawmakers had assumed those proposals would make it into the package, and critics of the deal said those ideas could pump money into the economy more quickly than tax rebate checks that won’t be delivered until June.
Democrats wanted to extend unemployment benefits for people whose 26 weeks of benefits have run out, but Republicans resisted.

Conservative Republicans, meanwhile, were likely to be restless over tax rebates going to those without income tax liability.
Democratic aides said greater GOP flexibility over giving relief to poor families with children — who would not have been eligible under Bush’s original tax rebate proposal — was the catalyst that moved the talks forward.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080124/ap_on_go_co/economy_stimulus

All i can say is “Yaaaaaaaaahoooooooo” :D:D :biggthumb

I think is will help out a bit due to the continued crunch of local economy. I’ll be able to pay off some bill(s) :faizy:

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

[EMAIL="#@#@#@#$$"]@#@#@#@#$$...Damn bush, He shd have given this rebate everyone instead of a particular tax bracket !

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Ameer log don’t need tax breaks! :naraz:

Sharafat se tax pay karo.. :hoonh:

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

so what are the caps for a family with 2 kids? :D

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Hain uncle, weren't you in karachi?

Yeh kaisa scam chal rahe hain??? :ASA:

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Aunty ji you haven't followed my posts truly.... I returned back last week :p

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Return hue ya thappa lagwa liya?

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

chor har ek ko chor hi samajhta hay tsk tsk... been living here for past 12 years :p

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

I heard upper limit for a family is $150,000 per annum.
will they decide based on 2006 or 2007 returns. For me it can be difference of $1500 or $0?

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

not $0, but you won't get $1500.... it goes down from $600 for the taxpayer after $75k (its not $600 or $0).

150k is upper limit to get maximum amount which for you seems to be 1500.

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

So wait...what about the people that didn't work this fiscal year? do they get $600 by default then? i mean Legals. not illegal or anything

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

yeah do I have any chances lol...

oh by the way I have question... I had an internship last summer but the program didn't deduct any tax on the stipend. They just mailed my checks to my school and my school mailed it to me. So do I have to pay tax on that amount or ....?

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Isnt it zero if your annual salary is more than $150K?

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Thats what I believe, $150k is the limit for dual income family to get MAXIMUM benefit ($1200 with 0 kids, each kid adds $300).

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

That is how they are going to evaluate... based on your filing. If they pick filings for this year (your income of 2007) and you had no income to report then you don't get anything... for any income above $3000 you will get $300.

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Guess it is useful for people who need that money. I doubt an extra 1000 will make too much difference for any family making over 50k but money is money.

Between this and interest. Rate cut, dollar is going to get whacked some more. In effect represents a wealth tfr from China, Saudi and Japan and all other holders of large dollar positions and assets!

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Good.. That is what I also said in my earlier post. based on what years tax returns they chose as criteria it can be either $1500 or $0 for me? :mad:

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

when does it become $0? :konfused:

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

you americans with ur taxes :rolleyes:

ek general mai thread kafi nahi tha?

i never got the hang of amreeki taxes. if i pay them with my salary whats this additional thing for? i had to see H&R block after three years of blissful ignorance about the functionings of amreeki IRS

Re: Tax rebates deal for U.S. residents

Even over $150k, they will pro-rata the rebate all the way up to $169k for married filing jointly. So unless you jumped all the way from under $150k to over $170k in one year, you will likely get something.

Tariq Akhtar, $1,000 may not make a huge difference to one family (though I personally think it does), but the way policy makers look at it is more macro-level. They will send these rebate checks to all tax payers, and if 50% of them spent it to buy stuff, the impact on retailers (and subsequent taxes) will be in the tune of multi-million dollars. Thats what the law makers and economists look at. They want consumers to spend more, and pump more money in the economy.