Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
I know…Especially about the scholars of Deoband is just made up…
But with the Aqaaids of the Barelvis, anything is possible…That’s why I posted that link, because a few of them are what I heard myself…
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
I know…Especially about the scholars of Deoband is just made up…
But with the Aqaaids of the Barelvis, anything is possible…That’s why I posted that link, because a few of them are what I heard myself…
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
^ Thats totally injustice. Either that person is liar altogether for both Devbandiz and Barelviz or they might have said that in their books. I know lots of sufi stuff in Fazail-e-Amaal written by Zakeriya Kandhelvi sahab, in some occasions hazir/nazir etc etc controversial conditions do not apply on Prophet since he was a human like us, and on others their Shyookh could do wonders.
Someone needs to check the quoted Devbandi Books to verify. But that link CAN'T be provided to someone as a 'CLARIFICATION' on Barelvi aqeeda, as you posted wihtout verification.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
instead of reading and quoting references from man made books and web sites why dont you read and quote Quranic verses .
"this(quran) is the book whereof there is no doubt a guidance to those who are al muttaqun."(chapter2 ayah2)
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
There are many 'Saheeh' Bukhari versions floating around none matches other. Allah never promised to save any book other than the Holy Quran so we need to be careful in quoting ANY book other than Qura'n.
Use common sense but off course its not so common as evident from this thread!
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
you can get the arabic version of sahih bukhari.............i think its much more reliable than urdu or other translations.even the best way is to read and understand in its original language.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
Use common sense but off course its not so common as evident from this thread!
You should actually be more careful in quoting the Qur'an than any other book deedawar, more than anything else. Even reciting one letter of the Qur'an incorrectly is dangerous and you might be saying something other than what it really means, just by improper prononciation. If you make one mistake, you might be giving someone a different meaning from what it really does mean.
That is the reason why we have hufaadh and mufasireen and ilm al-qur'an, which scholars who have authority, ijazah, to teach Qur'an can show us.
In regards to the ahadith, there are today, hadith masters recognized in the entire world, known as the al-Ghumari Mashayakhin from Syria like Shaykh Ahmad Siddiq al-Ghumari. If anyone knows the ahadith, they surely do - they have memorized hundreds of thousands of ahadith and they have memorized them with their isnad.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
That is the reason why we have hufaadh and mufasireen and ilm al-qur'an, which scholars who have authority, ijazah, to teach Qur'an can show us..
No argument there. But not related to what I posted. In fact it complements what I said.
OK. May be so. But Allah did not promise these books to be preserved.
Does not prove that we have many 'Saheeh' books floating around which have different versions and NOT to be regarded authentic if they contradict each other or Quran or common sense based on available Islamic norms/history.
My Bro!........Qura'n is considered absolute and can be quoted with authentic translations for non-arabic people since Allah promised it to be preserved.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
Preserved in its original form....it was never preserved in English. Look at the word Idribihunne such as the form of it used in Surah al Nisah Ayat 36. This word, has over 100 different meanings.
Another example, is when the Qur'an was being spread across the Muslim lands, Hadhrat Uthman (ra) called for all the Qur'ans to be collected and they were all destroyed, and replaced with copies of one type of Qur'an, to maintain that they were preserved in the original form - this was by the Qadr of Allah jalla jalalu. The point here is, that even though different arab factions across the middle east were
translating the Qur'an into their own dialects, Hadhrat Uthman (ra) saw this as a problem because in the early years of the spread of Islam, he didn't want the Qurayshi arabic to be lost.
Just in that manner, the Qur'an is preserved in its arabic form.
We're on the same page regarding the matter of the Qur'an....
In regards to the Ahadith, it should be noted that there is a sect out there which denies the ahadith, they are blasphemers. They do not believe in the Ahadith, they are known as "Ahl al-Qur'an" and they deny ALL hadith wholeheartidly. These people are astray.
The ahadith are there to help us. Let's not ever think of discarding them. there is a science of hadith in which its transmission can be verified, by the narrators of the hadith, by looking at the reliability of those such narrators, and by looking at the multiplicity of the hadith by different chains of narrators in many cases as well.
I choose to stick to the Qur'an and the Prophet's Ithra (which is his example, whether it be the ahadith, or his blessed family (alaiyhimis salaam).)
By sticking to these two things and never turning our backs against them, we can be among those fortunate enough to meet our beloved Sayyidina Muhammad (saws) at the Fountain of Kawthar so that he can look upon us with his beautiful smile.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
Ya_Sultan_e_Madina
You're right and I was wrong. :)
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
^this is so sad to hear sister. How can you agree with them with their shirki belief?
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
^You don't need to be sad my brother in the palace. It's very proud of you to call others mushrik and shirki without any clear evidence. Very sad to see this kind of words coming from a person who claims to be "mo'min".
Ya_Sultan_e_Madina
You're right and I was wrong. :)
Did you find any qoute from 6 Sahih books that any of the companions ever called upon Prophet saw after his death like people do now?
through al-`Abbas (Allah be pleased with them)
A question:
How do the contemporary Hanafi scholars explain the hadeeth recorded in Sahih Al-Bukhari according to which Khalifah Umar (Allah be pleased with him) asked Ibn Abbas (Allah be pleased with him) to ask Allah for rain on behalf of the Muslim community and not the Prophet Muhammad at his grave. The Khalifah said that they USED to ask the Prophet Muhammad to ask Allah and now they asked his uncle instead.
Before turning to the question and its questionable premises some preliminary remarks are in order.
First of all, Umar asked al-Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib, not his son Abd Allah ibn Abbas. What was posted recently on the Hanbali forum is a mistake which I pointed out to the author. Second, the terminology of the Khalifa's request, Allah be well-pleased with him, is as follows: "O Allah! We would use our Prophet as a means to You and You then sent us rain; now we use our Prophet's uncle as a means to You, therefore send us rain!" Narrated from Anas by al-Bukhari in his Sahih. “Whoever understands from this that Umar only used al-Abbas as his means and not the Messenger of Allah, upon him peace, because al-Abbas is alive and the Messenger of Allah is dead – that person’s understanding is dead.” (Al-Maliki)
Al-Suyuti mentions the context of this event in his Tarikh al-Khulafa’ (Beirut, 1992 Ahmad Fares ed. p. 140):
"In the year 17 Umar enlarged the Prophetic mosque. That year there was a drought in the Hijaz. It was named the Year of Cinders (am al-ramada). Umar prayed for rain for the people by means of al-Abbas. Ibn Sad narrated from [the Sahabi] Niyar al-Aslami that when Umar came out to pray for rain, he came out wearing the cloaks (burd) of the Messenger of Allah, upon him blessings and peace. Ibn Awn narrated that Umar took al-Abbas's hand and raised it up, saying, 'O Allah, we seek a means to You with the uncle of Your Prophet to ask that You drive away from us the drought and water us with rain'...." Now, the event of the tawassul of Sayyiduna Umar through al-Abbas shows the following: [1] Nowhere in the hadith is there any indication that there was no tawassul through the Prophet upon him peace, in the time of Umar. Such a view is an inference or an extrapolation that is not based on explicit evidence.
[2] On the contrary, Umar implicitly made tawassul through the Prophet upon him peace, at that very time, by wearing his blessed cloaks as he came out for the prayer for rain as mentioned in the report by Ibn Sad. In Sahih Muslim Asma’ says that she inherited the mantle of the Prophet from her sister `A’isha and that they used it to seek a cure for people.
[3] The use of the Prophet’s uncle illustrates that tawassul is essentially through the Prophet respect is only in his relationship to the Prophet as Umar himself states with the words "the uncle of Your Prophet" in al-Bukhari's version already mentioned; "the status of al-Abbas in relation to your Prophet" in al-Lalika’i’s version; and as al-Abbas states: "O Allah, truly no tribulation descends except because of sins, nor is lifted except upon repentence. The people have turned to you by means of me BECAUSE OF MY POSITION IN RELATION TO YOUR PROPHET, and here are our hands [raised up] towards you - despite our sins - and our forelocks in repentence, so send down water for us and PRESERVE YOUR PROPHET IN THE PERSON OF HIS UNCLE." Whereupon the sky let down water as thick as ropes and the people came over to al-Abbas passing their hands over him and saying to him: “Congratulations to you, irrigator of the two Sanctuaries!” Whereupon `Umar said, “He/This is, by Allah, the means to Allah and the place of nearness to Him!”
Cited from al-Zubayr ibn Bakkar’s narration in al-Ansab by Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari (2:497).
So the tawassul continues to be solely through the Prophet despite appearances to the contrary, for he is the ultimate recourse of human beings seeking nearness to Allah as he himself taught the blind man (“Say, ‘O Muhammad, I turn with you to Allah…’”) and as several Sahaba explicitly said, such as in the following reports:
(a) Report of the Bedouin who said to the Holy Prophet
Ali stood up and said: "O Messenger of Allah, I think you mean his saying: A fair-skinned one by whose face rainclouds are sought, A caretaker for the orphans and protector of widows. With him the clan of Hashim seek refuge from calamities, For they possess in him immense favor and grace...." Narrated by al-Bayhaqi in Dala'il al-Nubuwwa (6:141) cf. Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya (6:90-91) and Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari (1989 ed. 2:629). (b) Report of Sawad ibn Qarib al-Sadusi who declaimed: Truly, you are the nearest of all Messengers as a means to Allah, son of the noblest and purest ones! Therefore, be an intercessor for me the Day none but you among intercessors shall be of the least benefit for Sawad ibn Qarib! Whereupon the Prophet smiled, upon him peace, and said: “You have obtained success, Sawad!” Narrated by Abu Yala in his Mujam (p. 265), al-Tabarani in al-Kabir (7:94 §6475), Abu Nuaym in Dala’il al-Nubuwwa (p. 114 §63), al-Taymi in the Dala’il (p. 132), al-Hakim in the Mustadrak, (3:705), al-Bayhaqi in the Dala’il (2:251) cf. Ibn Abd al-Barr, Istiab (2:675), Ibn Kathir, Tafsir (4:169) and Bidaya, Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari (7:180) and Isaba (3:219).Abd al-Barr in al-Istiab (1:276) and Ibn Sayyid al-Nas in Minah al-Mad-h (p. 73).Umar's prayer for rain shows that there was also an explicit tawassul through the Prophet upon him peace, performed by the Sahabi Bilal ibn al-Harith as narrated in two versions: (a) Version 1 From the Sahabi Malik al-Dar: The people suffered a drought in Umar’s khilafa, whereupon a man came to the grave of the Prophet sallAllahu alayhi wa- Alihi wa-Sallam and said: "Messenger of Allah! Ask for rain for your Community, for verily they have but perished." After this the Prophet appeared to him in a dream and told him: "Go to Umar and give him my greeting, then tell him that they will be watered. Tell him: Be clever!" The man went and told Umar. The latter wept and said: "My Lord! I spare no effort except in what escapes my power." Ibn Kathir cites it thus from al-Bayhaqi's Dala'il al-Nubuwwa (7:47) in al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya (Maarif ed. 7:91-92=Dar Ihya’ al-Turath ed. 7:105) saying: “isnaduhu sahih” and he also declares its chain sound (isnaduhu jayyidun qawi) in his Jamial-Masanid (1:223) in MusnadUmar. Ibn Abi Shayba cites it (6:352=12:31-32) with a sound (sahih) chain as confirmed by Ibn Hajar who says: “rawa Ibn Abi Shayba bi’isnadin sahih” and cites the hadith in Fath al-Bari, Book of Istisqa ch. 3 (1989 ed. 2:629-630=1959 ed. 2:495) as well as in al-Isaba (6:164 §8350=3:484) where he says that Ibn Abi Khaythama cited it. It is also thus narrated by al-Khalili in al-Irshad (1:313- 314) and Ibn Abd al-Barr in al-Istiab (2:464=3:1149).al-Minara (p. 262-278), which refutes other similar attempts cf. Ibn Baz's marginalia on Fath al-Bari, Abu Bakr al-Jaza'iri's tract Wa-Ja'u Yarkudun, Hammad al-Ansari's articles "al-Mafhum al-Sahih lil-Tawassul" also titled "Tuhfat al-Qari fil-Raddala al-Ghumari," and other such literature.Umar the Companion Bilal ibn al-Harith, while slaughtering a sheep for his kin, noticed that the sheep's bones had turned red because the drying flesh was clinging to them. He cried out "Ya Muhammadah!" Then he saw the Prophet - upon him peace - in a dream ordering him to go to Umar with the tidings of coming rain on condition that Umar show wisdom. Hearing this, Umar assembled the people and came out to pray for rain with al-Abbas, the uncle of the Prophet upon him blessings and peace. [5] Umar had made tawassul through the Prophet in the past, upon him peace, since he said: “WE WOULD USE OUR PROPHET AS A MEANS TO YOU…” i.e. in his and Abu Bakr’s rule (and not only during the life of the Prophet upon him peace), as it is improbable that they never once experienced drought in the previous 8.5 years. “But to restrict this sententence to the Prophet’s lifetime is a deficiency stemming from idle lust, a manipulation of the text of the report, and figurative interpretation without proof.” (Al-Kawthari)A'isha - Allah be well- pleased with her - in al-Darimi's Sunan, in the 15th Chapter of the Introduction (1:43) titled: "Allah's generosity to His Prophet after his death," related from Aws ibn Abd Allah with a good chain:A'isha of the severe drought that they were suffering. She said: "Go to the Prophet's grave and open a window towards the sky so that there will be no roof between him and the sky." They did so, after which they were watered with such rain that vegetation grew and the camels got fat. That year was named the Year of Plenty." The reader will find extensive documentation on this report in the Encyclopedia of Islamic Doctrine (4:47-52) and it was declared authentic by all the Sunni experts of hadith, last in date Shaykh Nabil ibn Hashim al-Ghamri in his 1999 10-volume edition of and commentary on al-Darimi titled Fath al-Mannan (1:564-566) where he rejects the objections of al-Albani and his likes to this hadith. [7] Umar had made tawassul through the Prophet upon him peace, in the campaign of Tabuk and had therefore directly experienced the Divine munificence and Prophetic generosity.Umar came to the Prophet upon him peace, and said, 'How will they survive without their camels?' The Prophet said, 'Call to them to bring every remainder of their travel provisions.' A piece of leather was spread and they brought whatever they had. Then the Messenger of Allah stood and supplicated, then he blessed over the food and summoned them to being their bags. The people supplied themselves to the last one. Then the Messenger of Allah said, 'I bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah!'" Narrated from Salama ibn al-Akwa by al-Bukhari and Muslim and from Abu Hurayra by Muslim and Ahmad.Umar used al-Abbas to show people the status of the Prophet’s family in the society and teach them to respect and venerate them, as Ibn Hajar said in explanation of the report of Anas cited above:alayhi wa-Alihi wa-Sallam, and it shows al-Abbas’s great merit and that of Umar due to the latter's humbleness before al-Abbas and his recognition of his due right.”a and Ahmad in Fada'il al-Sahaba (2:937 #1802) that Kab al- Ahbar took al-Abbas's hand and said, "I shall hide it away [this handshake] for your intercession on my behalf." Al- Abbas replied: “Why, will I have the power of intercession?” Kab said: "Yes, there is none from the Household of the Prophet upon him and them peace, except they have the power of intercession!" Kab al-Ahbar also said to Sayyidina Umar: "Whenever the Israelites had a drought they sought intercession through their Prophet's household" as narrated by Ibn Abd al- Barr in al-Istiab (2:814). [9] It is known that Umar had a particular veneration for the Prophetic Household (Ahl al-Bayt) as illustrated by the following reports:d narrated from al-Shabi and al-Hasan that al- Abbas had some need of Umar one day and said to him: “Commander of the Believers, suppose the uncle of Musa, upon him peace, came to you as a Muslim, how would you treat him?” He replied, “I swear by Allah that I would treat him well!” Al-Abbas said, "Well, I am the uncle of Muhammad the Prophet - upon him and his House blessings and peace!" Umar said, "Abu al-Fadl, and what do you suppose? By Allah, your father Abd al-Muttalib] is certainly dearer to me than my own father!" He said, "By Allah?" Umar said, “By Allah, yes! Because I know that he Abd al-Muttalib] is dearer to the Messenger of Allah than my own father, therefore I prefer the love of the Messenger of Allah to my love." (b) A man disparaged Ali ibn Abi Talib in the presence of Umar whereupon the latter said: "Do you know the dweller of this grave? He is Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Abd al-Muttalib. And Ali is the son of Abu Talib ibn Abd al-Muttalib. Therefore, do not mention Ali except in a good way for if you dislike him you will harm this one in his grave.” Narrated by Ahmad with a good chain in Fada’il al-Sahaba (2:641 #1089).Umar saw al-Husayn ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib waiting at his door he said to him: “You are more deserving of permission to enter than [my son] Abd Allah ibn Umar! You see the goodness that was placed on our head; [therefore] first Allah; then you [the Prophetic Household]!” and he placed his hand on his head as he spoke. Narrated by Ibn Sad, Ibn Rahuyah, and al-Khatib. (d) Jabir said he heard Umar ibn al-Khattab say on the pulpit after he married Umm Kulthum, the daughter of Ali and Fatima - Allah be well-pleased with them: "Do not disparage me [for marrying a young girl], for I heard the Prophet say, upon him blessings and peace: 'On the Judgment Day every means will be cut off and every lineage severed except my lineage.'" Narrated by al-Tabarani. Al-Haythami said its narrators are those of al-Bukhari and Muslim. Umar desired to place himself in the Prophet’s lineage through this marriage due to the precedence of Ahl al-Bayt in the Prophet’s intercession, upon him and them peace.a*) and by means of al-Abbas’s mere supplication as claimed by the innovators and by the terminology of the question cited above. Rather, it was by means of their person (dhat) AND dua as literally stated in the following reports among many others: (a) Intercession through the Prophet's person according to Ibn Umar:Abdullah ibn Dinar said: "I heard Ibn Umar reciting the poetic verses of Abu Talib:Umar ibn Hamza said: Salim narrated from his father (Ibn Umar) that the latter said: “The poet’s saying came to my mind as I was looking at the face of the Prophet upon him blessings and peace - while he was praying for rain - and he did not come down until the rain water flowed profusely from every roof-gutter:Abbas's person according to Umar:alayhi wa-Alihi wa-Sallam considered al-Abbas like his father, venerating him and greatly respecting him and his rights. Therefore, O people! take the lead of the Messenger of Allah in the person of his uncle al-Abbas and take the latter as your means to Allah Most High in the context of your tribulation." Narrated from Umar with a sound chain by al-Baladhiri and with weak chains from Ibn Umar by al-Zubayr ibn Bakkar in al-Ansab and Ibn Asakir in Tarikh Dimashq (8:932) as cited by Ibn Hajar in the Fath (1959 ed. 2:497). Shaykh Mahmud Mamduh in Rafal- Minara (p. 120) rejected al-Albani's claim in his book al-Tawassul (p. 67-68) that the chain of this hadith is "mixed up" (mudtarib) as inapplicable here. [11]Umar showed the possibility of tawassul through X. even though Y. - also present - may be better than X. He showed that tawassul through the inferior in the presence of the superior is permissible as there is Consensus that the best of all living human beings after Prophets then, namely Umar, Uthman, and Ali are all three superior to al-Abbas, Allah be well-pleased with all of them. This was also a mark of humbleness on Umar's part as already cited from Fath al-Bari. Another example of this is the tawassul of Muawiya for rain through the Sahabi Yazid ibn al-Aswad al-Amiri as narrated by Abu Zura al-Dimashqi in his Tarikh and his tawassul also through the Tabii Abu Muslim al-Khawlani as narrated by Ahmad in al-Zuhd cf. al-Tahanawi, Ila’ al-Sunan (8:193).Umar used al-Abbas also as a precaution lest people’s faith in the Prophet upon him peace, be shaken in case the prayer were not answered.Umar. Al-Abbas’s position in this event is that of the deputy of the latter as the Commander of the Believers. And Allah knows best.I have compiled the above from the references cited below and the lights imparted by my teachers on this subject – may Allah keep them and thank them for guarding pure and authentic Sunni doctrine from the ignorant and the extremists.
Contemporary Hanafi References:
Abd Allah ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Makki al- Hashimi, al-Salafiyya al-Mu`asira: Munaqashat wa-Rudud (“Contemporary Salafism: Discussions and Rebuttals”) p. 143-145.al-Ghabi bi-Jawaz al- Tawassul bil-Nabi ("Compelling the Dunderheaded Innovator to Accept the Permissibility of Using the Prophet as a Means"). Ed. HasanAli al-Saqqaf. 2nd ed. Amman: Dar al-Imam al-Nawawi, 1992.al-Minara bi-Ahadith al-Tawassul wal- Ziyara ("Raising the Lighthouse with the Hadiths of Seeking Means and Visitation [of the Prophet]") p. 118-121. In his book (al-balagh-ul-Mubeen) Imam Shah Waliullah infers that the Khalifah did not consider it allowed to ask those who had left this world or the absent for intercession. This is contrary to the view reported from Shah Wali Allah in his book Fuyud al-Haramayn ("The Outpourings of the Two Sanctuaries) cf. [Al-maqsood.org - al maqsood Resources and Information. This website is for sale!](http://www.al-maqsood.org/islam/shah-1.htm) The apparent contradiction is explained by the fact that some books of Shah Wali Allah may not be free from Wahhabistic interpolations, see LivingIslam.org < Ibn Taymiyya/ Shah Wali Allah/ IbnAbd al-Barr >](Ibn Taymiyya/Shah Wali Allah/Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr)Azama (5:1572) Ibn Kathir, Tafsir (3:360) Ibn Hajar, Talkhis al-Habir (2:97 #718) Ibn al-Mulaqqin, Khulasat al-Badr (1:250) Al-Sanani, Subul al-Salam (2:83)la, al-Bazzar and others. So we may hope for their intercession, but not for that of the Prophet Muhammad?? No, the Khalifah did not consider the Prophet upon him peace, to be absent nor to have left this world. Otherwise, why did he address the Prophet upon him peace, and Abu Bakr in their graves as narrated by al-Tabarani through trustworthy narrators (see below) and why was "nothing more important to him" - as narrated from him by al- Bukhari in his Sahih - than to be buried near them? Qays ibn Abi Hazim narrated that one day, Umar addressed the people from the pulpit in Madina and said in his address:Adn a palace which has five hundred doors, each posted with five thousand of the ladies of Paradise, and none but a Prophet shall enter it." At this point he turned to the grave of the Messenger of Allah - upon him blessings and peace - and said: "Congratulations to you, O dweller of this grave!" Then he continued: "And none but a Most-Truthful One (siddiq) shall enter it." At this point he turned towards Abu Bakr's grave and said: "Congratulations to you, Abu Bakr!" Then he said: "And none but a Martyr shall enter it," and he pointed to himself. He continued, speaking to himself outloud: "And when did you inherit martyrdom, Umar?” Then he said: “Truly, the One who brought me out from Makka unto the migration to Madina is able to bring me martyrdom!”al-Zawa'id (9:54-55). Do the Ahnaaf consider Khalifah Umar to have performed his ijtihad on this issue but the Ahnaaf disagreed with him? Please explain. Even if the act ofUmar were not originally a Sunna - which it is - the ijtihad of the Khulafa’ al-Rashidin nevertheless has the probative force of Sunna in this Religion, with which no School, Hanafi or other, is at liberty to differ. Not that the Ahnaaf disagreed with him in this or in anything else whatsoever that comes to mind! And it is a poorly phrased question indeed that places an entire Sunni School in the immaterial position of disagreeing with one of the Khulafa’ al-Rashidin when this is the exclusive wont of Ahl al-Bid`a.Hajj Gibril
GF Haddad
[Mon, 20 Oct 2003]
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
Now there is a confusion!!!
Imam Abu Hanfia believes that if any one calls Allah, while referring to the Prophet (PBUH) of any other dead person, then that is shirk... if requried i can scan and post the whole page ( along with ref ofcourse..)
Now if Imam Abu Hanfia don't like the so called idea of tawasul, then how come others developed it and produced ahadees for this?
Now there is a confusion!!!
Imam Abu Hanfia believes that if any one calls Allah, while referring to the Prophet (PBUH) of any other dead person, then that is shirk... if requried i can scan and post the whole page ( along with ref ofcourse..)
Now if Imam Abu Hanfia don't like the so called idea of tawasul, then how come others developed it and produced ahadees for this?
Please do so.
Re: Tawassul of the Sahabahs
Hareem
In the your post, the only Hadith from 6 Sahih books is that of Omer ra asking Abbas ra to pray for rain, there is no sonfusion whatsoever on this, one can go to any person alive to ask for prayer. The confusion is when someone says, O Prophet saw we seek your help and says this is a form of Tawassul
^You don't need to be sad my brother in the palace. It's very proud of you to call others mushrik and shirki without any clear evidence. Very sad to see this kind of words coming from a person who claims to be "mo'min".
sigh, respected sister please make a note of the followings:
1 - There's no point of a discussion if we're not sincere or our purpose is not to seek truth. We both know where you stand in that context and this is the reason why I didn't post my lengthy response.
2 - I labeled it as shirk because this is what the Qur'an tells us. The mushriks of Prophet (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) times did the same thing: prayed directly to their idols. What did the Qur'an say about them? What is the difference between them or Hindus or Christians (who pray to Jesus) and those Muslims who hold such belief?
3 - the narration of malik ad dhar is an evidence against you if you care to read the facts around the incident carefully. The hadith in saheeh al-bukhari is a proof of what I just said!
4 - allhamdulillah, I've never claimed to be a momin and may Allah Ta'ala make us among those, ameen.
5 - Would it change your aqeedah if i refute al-Haddad's article or post a lengthy response? I don't think so because you're a blind follower of al-kawthari group. Please don't make me even start about al-kawthari.
Hareem
In the your post, the only Hadith from 6 Sahih books is that of Omer ra asking Abbas ra to pray for rain, there is no sonfusion whatsoever on this, one can go to any person alive to ask for prayer. ....
Your point has been already answered in that link by shaykh haddad in the para where it talks about "we used to ask You through prophet".....
Also, not in siha e sitta but there's a sahih hadith in Tabrani,
Imam Tabrani relates in his al-Mu’jam al-Kabir reporting from the same Uthman ibn Hunaif that a person repeatedly visited him concerning something he needed, but Uthman paid no attention to him. The man met his son and complained to him about the matter- this was after the death of Muhammad and after the eras of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar - so Uthman (who collected Hadith and was from the learned) said : "Go to the place of Wudu, then come to the Masjid, perform two Rak’ats and then say : "O Allah!, I ask you and turn to you through our Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of Mercy. O Muhammad! I turn through you to my lord, that He fulfil my need"....... until the end of the Hadith.
The confusion is when someone says, O Prophet saw we seek your help and says this is a form of Tawassul
Shakh Nuh keller's article in which he quoted "The Hanafi scholar, Muhammad Hamid says: As for calling upon (nida') the righteous (when they are physically absent, as in the words "O Muhammad" in the above hadiths), tawassul to Allah Most High through them is permissible, the supplication (du'a) being to Allah Most Glorious, and there is much evidence for its permissibility.
Those who call on them intending "tawassul" cannot be blamed. As for someone who believes that those called upon can cause effects, benefit, or harm, which they create or cause to exist as Allah does, such a person is an idolator who has left Islam - Allah be our refuge! This then, and a certain person has written an article that tawassul to Allah Most High through the righteous is unlawful, while the overwhelming majority of scholars hold it is permissible, and the evidence the writer uses to corrobrate his viewpoint is devoid of anything that demonstrates what he is trying to prove. In declaring tawassul permissible, we are not hovering on brink of idolatory (shirk) or coming anywhere near it, for the conviction that Allah Most High alone has influence over anything, outwardly or inwardly, is a conviction that flows through us like our very lifeblood. If tawassul was idolatory (shirk), or if there were any suspicion of idolatory in it, the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) would not have taught it to the blind man when the latter asked him to supplicate Allah for him, though in fact he did teach him to make "tawassul" to Allah through him. And the notion that tawassul is permissible only during the lifetime of the person through whom it is done but not after his death is unsupported by any viable foundation from Sacred Law "Rudud 'ala abatil wa rasa'il al-Shaykh Muhammad al-Hamid]
2 - I labeled it as shirk because this is what the Qur'an tells us. The mushriks of Prophet (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) times did the same thing: prayed directly to their idols. What did the Qur'an say about them? What is the difference between them or Hindus or Christians (who pray to Jesus) and those Muslims who hold such belief? 5 - Would it change your aqeedah if i refute al-Haddad's article or post a lengthy response? I don't think so because you're a blind follower of al-kawthari group. Please don't make me even start about al-kawthari.
.
No one is praying to the idols, you are only assuming things about other muslims who don't agree with you on certain things and this is just sad.
in other thread you were calling me rafai and now you're calling me kawthri, make up your mind.
Your point has been already answered in that link by shaykh haddad in the para where it talks about "we used to ask You through prophet".....
Also, not in siha e sitta but there's a sahih hadith in Tabrani, Imam Tabrani relates in his al-Mu’jam al-Kabir reporting from the same Uthman ibn Hunaif that a person repeatedly visited him concerning something he needed, but Uthman paid no attention to him. The man met his son and complained to him about the matter- this was after the death of Muhammad and after the eras of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar - so Uthman (who collected Hadith and was from the learned) said : "Go to the place of Wudu, then come to the Masjid, perform two Rak’ats and then say : "O Allah!, I ask you and turn to you through our Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of Mercy. O Muhammad! I turn through you to my lord, that He fulfil my need"....... until the end of the Hadith.
Shakh Nuh keller's article in which he quoted "The Hanafi scholar, Muhammad Hamid says: As for calling upon (nida') the righteous (when they are physically absent, as in the words "O Muhammad" in the above hadiths), tawassul to Allah Most High through them is permissible, the supplication (du'a) being to Allah Most Glorious, and there is much evidence for its permissibility.
Those who call on them intending "tawassul" cannot be blamed. As for someone who believes that those called upon can cause effects, benefit, or harm, which they create or cause to exist as Allah does, such a person is an idolator who has left Islam - Allah be our refuge! This then, and a certain person has written an article that tawassul to Allah Most High through the righteous is unlawful, while the overwhelming majority of scholars hold it is permissible, and the evidence the writer uses to corrobrate his viewpoint is devoid of anything that demonstrates what he is trying to prove. In declaring tawassul permissible, we are not hovering on brink of idolatory (shirk) or coming anywhere near it, for the conviction that Allah Most High alone has influence over anything, outwardly or inwardly, is a conviction that flows through us like our very lifeblood. If tawassul was idolatory (shirk), or if there were any suspicion of idolatory in it, the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) would not have taught it to the blind man when the latter asked him to supplicate Allah for him, though in fact he did teach him to make "tawassul" to Allah through him. And the notion that tawassul is permissible only during the lifetime of the person through whom it is done but not after his death is unsupported by any viable foundation from Sacred Law "Rudud 'ala abatil wa rasa'il al-Shaykh Muhammad al-Hamid]
So in short the answer to my question is No. No Hadith exists in 6 Sahih books that shows Tawassul by directly calling upon Prophet saw was practiced by Sahaba.
While i have no intention to pass fatwa on those who do, the evidence for my own self is clear, i won't do it. And it also shows that it is something that gradually came into practice.