Tawassul: Islamic vs. bid’ah

Tawassul: Islamic vs. bid’ah

http://www.islam-qa.com

Tawassul in Arabic means seeking to draw close. Allaah says in the Qur’aan (interpretation of the meaning): “…[they] desire means of access to their Lord…” [al-Isra’ 17:57], i.e., means of drawing close to Him. There are two types of Tawassul, correct Islamic tawassul and forbidden tawassul.

Correct Islamic tawassul:

This means seeking to draw close to Allaah through acts of worship which He loves and which please Him; these may be waajib (obligatory) or mustahabb (encouraged), and may take the form of words, actions or beliefs. Some types are as follows:

Seeking to draw close to Allaah by means of His names and attributes. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): **“And (all) the Most Beautiful Names belong to Allaah, so call on Him by them, and leave the company of those who belie or deny (or utter impious speech against) His names. They will be requited for what they used to do.” **[al-A’raaf 7:180]. So when a person makes du’aa’ to Allaah, he begins by calling on Allaah with the name that is most apt, such as “al-Rahmaan” (the Most Merciful) when seeking mercy and al-Ghafoor (the All-Forgiving) when asking for forgiveness, and so on.

Seeking to draw close to Allaah by means of faith and Tawheed. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Our Lord! We believe in what You have sent down, and we follow the Messenger, so write us down among those who bear witness (to the truth).” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:53]

Seeking to draw close to Allaah through righteous deeds, whereby a person asks Allaah by virtue of the best deeds that he has done, such as salaah, fasting, reading Qur’aan, avoiding haraam things, and so on. An example of this is the saheeh hadeeth narrated in the Saheehayn about the three people who entered a cave, and a rock fell and blocked their way out. They asked Allaah by virtue of their best deeds (to save them). A person may also ask Allaah by virtue of his total dependency upon Him, as Allaah mentions in the Qur’aan (interpretation of the meaning): “[Ayyoob said:] ‘Verily, distress has seized me, and You are the Most Merciful of those who show mercy.’ [al-Anbiya’ 21:83]; or by admitting his own wrongdoing and his need for Allaah, as Yoonus is described as saying (interpretation of the meaning): “ ‘None has the right to be worshipped except You (O Allaah). Glorified (and exalted) are You. Truly I have been of the wrong-doers.’” [al-Anbiya’ 21:87]

The rulings on Islamically correct tawassul vary according to its type. Some types are waajib, such as seeking to draw close to Allaah through His names and attributes and through Tawheed (believing in His absolute Oneness), and some are mustahabb, such as seeking to draw close to Him by virtue of all kinds of righteous deeds.

Tawassul that is bid’ah and therefore forbidden:

This is the attempt to draw close to Allaah by means of things that He does not like and that do not please Him, whether they be words, deeds or beliefs. One example of this is trying to draw close to Allaah by calling on the dead or people who are absent, asking them for help, and so on. This is a form of major shirk (shirk akbar), which goes against Tawheed and means that a person is no longer considered to be a Muslim. Calling upon Allaah, whether it is for a purpose such as asking Him to grant some benefit or to ward off some harm, or as an act of worship to express humility and submission before Him, can only be addressed directly to Allaah. If du’aa’s or prayers are addressed to anything or anyone else, this is shirk. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): *“And your Lord said: ‘Invoke Me (and ask Me for anything), I will respond to your invocation. Verily! Those who scorn My worship , they will surely enter Hell in humiliation!” [Ghaafir 40:60]. In this aayah, Allaah explains the punishment of those who arrogantly refuse to call on Allaah, whether they call on someone other than Allaah or they do not call on Him at all, out of pride and self-admiration, even if they do not call on anyone else.

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): **“Invoke your Lord with humility and in secret…” **[al-A’raaf 7:55]. Allaah commands His slaves to call on Him and not anyone else.

Allaah says of the people of Hell (interpretation of the meaning):** “[They say:] ‘By Allaah, we were truly in a manifest error when we held you (false gods) as equals (in worship) with the Lord of the Worlds.” **[al-Shu’ara’ 26:96-97]

Anything that results in equating something other than Allaah with Allaah in worship or acts of obedience is shirk, the crime of associating partners with Him. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): **“And who is more astray than one who calls (invokes) besides Allaah, such as will not answer him until the Day of Resurrection, and who are (even) unaware of their calls (invocations) to them? And when mankind are gathered (one the Day of Resurrection), they (false deities) will become enemies for them and will deny their worshipping.” **[al-Ahqaaf 46:5-6]

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):** “ And whoever invokes (or worships) besides Allaah, any other god, of whom he has no proof, then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely, al-kaafiroon (the disbelievers in Allaah and in the Oneness of Allaah) will not be successful.”** [al-Mu’minoon 23:117].

Allaah states that anyone who calls on anything other than him is taking that thing as a god, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “…And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a qitmeer (the thin membrane over a date-stone). If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call, and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them. And none can inform you (O Muhammad), like Him Who is the All-Knower (of everything).” [Faatir 35:13-14].

In this aayah, Allaah explains that He is the only One Who deserves to be called upon, because He, and no one else, is the Sovereign who is directing everything. Those things that are worshipped cannot hear du’aa’s, let alone respond to the one who invokes them, and even if they were able to hear, they cannot respond, because they do not have the power to either benefit or harm.

The mushrik Arabs whom the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was sent to call were disbelievers because of this shirk. They would call upon Allaah sincerely at times of difficulty, but they became disbelievers at times of ease and plenty, when they would call on others besides Him. Allaah says (interpretation of the meanings):

“And when they embark on a ship, they invoke Allaah, making their Faith pure for Him only, but when He brings them safely to land, behold, they give a share of their worship to others.” [al-‘Ankaboot 29:65]

“And when harm touches you upon the sea, those that you call upon besides Him vanish from you excpet Him (Allaah Alone). But when He brings you safely to land, you turn away (from Him)…” [al-Isra’ 17:67].

“… till when you are in the ships and they sail with them with a favourable wind, and they are glad therein, then comes a stormy wind and the waves come to them from all sides, and they think that they are encircled therein, they invoke Allaah, making their Faith pure for Him Alone…” [Yoonus 10:33]

The shirk of some people nowadays goes even further than the shirk of people in the past, because they direct some acts of worship to something other than Allaah, calling upon them and asking them for help even at times of distress; laa hawla wa laa quwwata illa Billaah (there is no strength and no help except in Allaah). We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound.

To sum up our response to what your friend mentioned: asking the dead for anything is shirk, and asking the living for anything that no one except Allaah is able to do, is also shirk. And Allaah knows best.

Take it easy.


V~V~VHe came, He saw, He conqueredV~V~V**


----*High Priest-OF-Painful Truth*----*

What you have referred to as bad tawassul is not tawassul at all. Rather its known as "Istighatha" or seeking help from somebody.

Seeking help from somebody thinking that they have the power to benefit or harm us is ascribing partners to Allah because every thing, living or dead is a creation of Allah and therefore dependent upon Allah for their own existence, even the person or object from whom the help is sought. That is why Christianity has serious flaws because its not just the verbal proclamation that Jesus is the Son of God(Naudhobillah) but the internalization of the concept that Jesus can fulfill our needs and bring us Salvation on the Day of Judgement. If a person that recites Kalima has the same concept about somebody else then how can he justify this aspect that he shares with the kuffar. Its not just the words that carry the significance but a person's perception of the reality. Christians have elevated the status of Jesus because of the extra-ordinary feats or miracles he could perform. Shaytaan led them to believe that such Miracles can only be performed by a person equivalent to God (naudhobillah) and not an ordinary person. Yet, they failed to realize that its Allah who had given Jesus all the power that he possessed and Allah could have taken it away from it too! It all boils down to the fact that every creation can experience decay or destruction in some manner but only Allah is High above such things. Death is a creation of Allah and so are objects that cause death and destruction. Allah is free from all defects, The Most High.

In real life it is allowed to ask for help from a living person so long as we realize that the real benefactor is Allah and this person was able to help us only through Allah's permission. But if we think that had this person not been there to help me then I would have been in trouble is in effect saying that ONLY this person could have helped me. Whereas Allah with all his Magnificence and Might can help us with or without the means. So we do appreciate the medium of help but we don't elevate him to the status of REAL AGENT which is Allah alone.

As far as the matter of dead is considered since they have departed this world they don't have the power or ability to help us. Besides, Rasool Allah (Sallalaho alaihe wasalam) was sent to us to teach us how to worship Allah and believe in Him and His Greatness. That's why he has taught us so many du'as for each and every occassion that cover all of our needs of this life and the life hereafter. It also comes in hadith that we send Salawat-us-Salaam on Rasool Allah (Sallalaho alaihe Wasalam) before and after the du'a. But the Du'a should always be directed towards Allah, The Ever-Living, Sustainer, Who Sustains the entire creation. Everything must taste of death except His 'Wajh'. He is independent of creation and does not need anybody while all the creation are slaves to Allah. Allah-o-Akbar.

Here is another ayah:

"Say (O Muhammad SAW): "Call unto those besides Him whom you pretend [to be gods]. They have neither the power to remove the adversity from you nor even to shift it from you to another person." (Al-Isra 56)

Well said Iqadeer and X-com.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

I agree, I wonder if Ahmad G read this post. Oh well.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif


V~V~VHe came, He saw, He conqueredV~V~V**


----*High Priest-OF-Painful Truth*----

(Change to Arabic settings to read Arabic)

This tells us that you people are just readers and have not acquired the knowledge the way should be.!

FIRST OF ALL, MAKING salata and salam on the Prophet after athan is a good innovation. Here are my fast prooves of clarifying bid^ah and that it's into two types as shafi^iyy said one that is bad and one that is good.

I hope that you won't have trouble reading Arabic. I'm a faster and better typer and speaker of Arabic language.

Read through and see how the FOUR SCHOOLS CLASSIFIED BID^AH.
ÈÓã Çááå æÇáÍãÏ ááå æÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã Úáì ÑÓæá Çááå¡
ÇáÅ뾃 ÇáÃÚÒÇÁ¡

ÇáÓáÇã Úáíßã æÑÍãÉ Çááå æÈÑßÇÊå¡

ÞÇá ÊÚÇáì: "Åöäøó Çááåó æóãóáÇóÆößóÊóåõ íõÕóáøõæäó Úóáóì ÇáäøóÈöíöø íó ÃóíøõåóÇ ÇáøóÐöíäó ÁóÇãóäõæÇ ÕóáøõæÇ Úóáóíúåö æóÓóáøÜöãõæÇ ÊóÓúáöíãÇð".

ÇÚáãæÇ ÅÎæÇäí Ýí ÇáÏíä Ãä ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ãä ÇáãÄÐäíä ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä ÈÏÚÉ ÍÓäÉ
ÝÅä ãÇ íÝÚáå ÇáãÄÐäæä ãä ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä åæ ÈÏÚÉ ÍÓäÉ æáåÇ ÃÕá Ýí ÇáÔÑÚ ÃáÇ æåæ Þæáå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã Ýí ÇáÍÏíË ÇáÐí ÑæÇå ãÓáã: "ÅÐÇ ÓãÚÊã ÇáãÄÐä ÝÞæáæ ãËáãÇ íÞæá Ëã ÕáæÇ Úáíø" æåÐÇ íßÝí ÏáíáÇð Ýí ÌæÇÒ ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ãä ÇáãÄÐäíä ÚÞÈ ÇáÃÐÇä.

æÞÏ ÈÏÃÊ ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí ãä ÞÈá ÇáãÄÐäíä ÈÚÏ ßá ÃÐÇä Ýí Òãä ÇáÓáØÇä ÍÇÌí Èä ÇáÃÔÑÝ ÔÚÈÇä¡ ÝÞÏ ÞÇá ÇáÍÇÝÙ ÇáÓíæØí Ýí ßÊÇÈå "ÇáæÓÇÆá Åáì ãÓÇãÑÉ ÇáÃæÇÆá" (Õ9): "Ãæá ãÇ ÒíÏ ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã ÈÚÏ ßá ÃÐÇä Ýí ÇáãäÇÑÉ Ýí Òãä ÇáÓáØÇä ÍÇÌí Èä ÇáÃÔÑÝ ÔÚÈÇä Èä ÍÓíä Èä ÇáäÇÕÑ ãÍãÏ Èä ÇáãäÕæÑ ÞáÇææä ÈÃãÑ ÇáãÍÊÓÈ äÌã ÇáÏíä ÇáØäÈÏí æÐáß Ýí ÔÚÈÇä ÓäÉ ÅÍÏì æÊÓÚíä æÓÈÚãÇÆÉ (791åÜ) æßÇä ÍÏË ÞÈá Ðáß Ýí ÃíÇã ÇáÓáØÇä ÕáÇÍ ÇáÏíä Èä ÃíæÈ Ãä íõÞÇá Ýí ßá áíáÉ ÞÈá ÃÐÇä ÇáÝÌÑ ÈãÕÑ æÇáÔÇã ÇáÓáÇã Úáì ÑÓæá Çááå æÇÓÊãÑ Ðáß Åáì ÓäÉ ÓÈÚ æÓÊíä æÓÈÚãÇÆÉ ÝÒíÏ ÈÃãÑ ÇáãÍÊÓÈ ÕáÇÍ ÇáÏíä ÇáÈÑáÓí Ãä íõÞÇá: ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã Úáíß íÇ ÑÓæá Çááå¡ Ëã ÌõÚá ÚÞÈ ßá ÃÐÇä ÓäÉ ÅÍÏì æÊÓÚíä”.

æåÐÇ ÇáÃãÑ ÌÇÆÒ ÈÅÌãÇÚ ÇáãÐÇåÈ ÇáÃÑÈÚÉ¡ æÅáíßã ÈÚÖ ÇáäÞæá ãä ÇáãÐÇåÈ ÇáÃÑÈÚÉ Ýí ÌæÇÒ ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä ãä ÞÈá ÇáãÄÐäíä:

ÇáãÐåÈ ÇáÍäÝí:
ÞÇá ÇáÔíÎ ãÍãÏ ÚáÇÁ ÇáÏíä ÇáÍÕßÝí ÇáÍäÝí Ýí ßÊÇÈå "ÇáÏÑ ÇáãÎÊÇÑ": "ÝÇÆÏÉ: ÇáÊÓáíã ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä Ýí ÑÈíÚ ÇáÂÎÑ ÓäÉ ÓÈÚãÇÆÉ æÅÍÏì æËãÇäíä Ýí ÚÔÇÁ áíáÉ ÇáÅËäíä¡ Ëã íæã ÇáÌãÚÉ¡ Ëã ÈÚÏ ÚÔÑ Óäíä ÍÏË Ýí Çáßá ÅáÇ ÇáãÛÑÈ¡ Ëã ÝíåÇ ãÑÊíä¡ æåæ ÈÏÚÉ ÍÓäÉ"¡ ÇäÙÑ ÍÇÔíÉ ÇÈä ÚÇÈÏíä (Ì1/390).

ÇáãÐåÈ ÇáãÇáßí:
ÞÇá ÇáÔíÎ ÔãÓ ÇáÏíä ãÍãÏ ÚÑÝÉ ÇáÏÓæÞí ÇáãÇáßí Ýí "ÍÇÔíÊå Úáì ÇáÔÑÍ ÇáßÈíÑ" (Ì1/193): "æÃãÇ ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä ÝÈÏÚÉ ÍÓäÉ Ãæøá ÍÏæËåÇ Òãä ÇáäÇÕÑ ÕáÇÍ ÇáÏíä íæÓÝ Èä ÃíæÈ". æäæÏ ÇáÊæÖíÍ åäÇ Ãä ÊÞÏíÑ ßáÇã ÇáÏÓæÞí åæ Ãäå Ýí Òãä ÇáäÇÕÑ ÕáÇÍ ÇáÏíä ÇáÃíæÈí ãÍÑÑ ÇáÃÞÕì ÍÏË ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÞÈá ÃÐÇä ÇáÝÌÑ¡ ÅáÇ Ãäå Ãæá ãÇ ÌÚá ÈÚÏ ßá ÃÐÇä ßåíÆÊå ÇáãÚÑæÝÉ Çáíæã ÝÝí Òãä ÇáÓáØÇä ÍÇÌí Èä ÇáÃÔÑÝ ÔÚÈÇä ßãÇ äÞáäÇ Ðáß Úä ÇáÓíæØí¡ ÝÇÞÊÖì ÇáÊæÖíÍ.

ÇáãÐåÈ ÇáÔÇÝÚí:
ÞÇá ÇáÍÇÝÙ ÇáÓÎÇæí ÇáÔÇÝÚí æåæ ÊáãíÐ ÇáÍÇÝÙ ÇÈä ÍÌÑ ÇáÚÓÞáÇäí Ýí ßÊÇÈå "ÇáÞæá ÇáÈÏíÚ Ýí ÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáÍÈíÈ ÇáÔÝíÚ" (Õ92): "ÞÏ ÃÍÏË ÇáãÄÐäæä ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã Úáì ÑÓæá Çááå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÚÞÈ ÇáÃÐÇä ááÝÑÇÆÖ ÇáÎãÓ ÅáÇ ÇáÕÈÍ æÇáÌãÚÉ ÝÅäåã íÞÏãæä Ðáß ÝíåÇ Úáì ÇáÃÐÇä æÅáÇ ÇáãÛÑÈ ÝÅäåã áÇ íÝÚáæäå ÃÕáÇð áÖíÞ æÞÊåÇ ..."¡ Åáì Ãä ÞÇá: "æÞÏ ÇÎÊáÝ Ýí Ðáß åá åæ ãÓÊÍÈ Ãæ ãßÑæå Ãæ ÈÏÚÉ Ãæ ãÔÑæÚ¡ æÇÓÊõÏöá ááÃæá ÈÞæáå ÊÚÇáì: {æóÇÝúÚóáõæÇ ÇáúÎóíúÑó} æãÚáæã Ãä ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã ãä ÃóÌóáø ÇáÞõÑøÈ áÇ ÓíãÇ æÞÏ ÊæÇÑÏÊ ÇáÃÎÈÇÑ Úáì ÇáÍË Úáì Ðáß ãÚ ãÇ ÌÇÁ Ýí ÝÕá ÇáÏÚÇÁ ÚÞÈ ÇáÃÐÇä æÇáËáË ÇáÃÎíÑ ãä Çááíá æÞÑÈ ÇáÝÌÑ "æÇáÕæÇÈ" Ãäå ÈÏÚÉ ÍÓäÉ íÄÌÑ ÝÇÚáå ÈÍÓä äíÊå"¡ ÇäÊåì ßáÇãå.

ÇáãÐåÈ ÇáÍäÇÈáí:
æÝí ßÊÇÈ "ãäÊåì ÇáÅÑÇÏÇÊ" ááÍäÇÈáÉ (Ì1/113-114): "æÓõäø áãÄÐä æÓÇãÚ Ãä íÕáíó Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÅÐÇ ÝÑÛ æíÞæá: Çááåã ÑÈ åÐå ÇáÏÚæÉ ÇáÊÇãÉ æÇáÕáÇÉ ÇáÞÇÆãÉ ÁÇÊ ÓíÏäÇ ãÍãÏ ÇáæÓíáÉ æÇáÝÖíáÉ æÇÈÚËå ãÞÇãÇð ãÍãæÏÇð ÇáÐí æÚÏÊå"¡ ÇäÊåì.

ÝåÐå ÇáäÞæá ÊËÈÊ Çä åÐÇ ÇáÃãÑ ÇáãÍÏË åæ ãä ÈÇÈ ÇáÈÏÚÉ ÇáÍÓäÉ ÝÇáÚáãÇÁ ãä ÇáãÐÇåÈ ÇáÃÑÈÚÉ ÃÌÇÒæÇ åÐÇ ÇáÃãÑ ÈÚÏ ÍÏæËå æáã íÓß澂 Úä ÊÈíÇä Íßã ÇáÏíä Ýíå¡ ÝÇáãÐÇåÈ ÇáÃÑÈÚÉ æááå ÇáÍãÏ ãÊÝÞÉ Úáì ÌæÇÒ åÐÇ ÇáÃãÑ.

æÞÏ íÞæá ÞÇÆá: Åä ÇáÎØÇÈ Ýí "ÞæáæÇ"æ"ÕáæÇ" ÇáæÇÑÏÉ Ýí ÇáÍÏíË(1) áÛíÑ ÇáãÄÐä ÝáÐáß ÝÅä ÇáÃãÑ ÈÇáÕáÇÉ Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÚÞÈ ÇáÃÐÇä áãä íÓãÚ ÇáÃÐÇä ãä ÇáãÄÐä áÇ ááãÄÐä äÝÓå.

íõÑÏ Úáì åÐå ÇáÔÈåÉ ÈÃääÇ áÇ äÓáøã Ãä ÇÓÊÚãÇá ÖãíÑ ÇáÛÇÆÈ Ýí ÍÞ ÇáãÄÐä íÏá Úáì ÇÓÊËäÇÆå¡ ÝåÐÇ ÇáßáÇã ãÑÏæÏ¡ æÇáÐí ÑÏøå åæ ÇáÅãÇã Çáäææí ÍíË ÞÇá Ýí ßÊÇÈå "ÑæÖÉ ÇáØÇáÈíä" (Ì1/203) ÊÍÊ ÚäæÇä Ýí ÕÝÉ ÇáãÄÐä æÁÇÏÇÈå: "æíÓÊÍÈ Ãä íßæä ÕíøÊÇð¡ ÍÓä ÇáÕæÊ ..."¡ Åáì Ãä ÞÇá: "æÃä íõÕáøöíó ÇáãÄÐä æãä ÓãÚ ÇáÃÐÇä Úáì ÑÓæá Çááå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä". ÇäÊåì ßáÇã Çáäææí.

æßÐáß ÑÏ ãËá åÐå ÇáÔÈåÉ ÇáÅãÇã ÔãÓ ÇáÏíä ÇáÑãáí ÇáãáÞÈ ÈÇáÔÇÝÚí ÇáÕÛíÑ Ýí ßÊÇÈå "äåÇíÉ ÇáãÍÊÇÌ Åáì ÔÑÍ ÇáãäåÇÌ" (Ì1/422) ÝÞÇá: "æíÓä áßáòø ãä ãÄÐä æÓÇãÚ æãÓÊãÚ æßÐÇ ãÞíã áÍÏíË æÑÏ Ýíå ÑæÇå ÇÈä ÇáÓäí æÐßÑå ÇáãÕäÝ Ýí ÃÐßÇÑå (íÞÕÏ ÈÇáãÕäÝ ÇáÅãÇã Çáäææí) Ãä íÕáíó æíÓáã Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã"¡ ÇäÊåì¡ æÇáÍÏíË ÇáÐí ÃÔÇÑ Åáíå ÇáÅãÇã ÇáÑãáí åæ ÇáÍÏíË ÇáÐí äÊßáã Úäå¡ ÝåÇ åæ ÇáÑãáí íÓÊÏá ÈåÐÇ ÇáÍÏíË Úáì ÌæÇÒ ÕáÇÉ ÇáãÄÐä Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä.

Ýãä íÎÕÕ ÇáãÄÐä ÈÇáãäÚ ãä ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã Úáì ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã íÍÊÇÌ Åáì Ïáíá¡ æÅÐÇ áã íßä åäÇß Ïáíá ÝåÐÇ ÇáÊÎÕíÕ ãä ÈÇÈ ÇáÊÍßã (æåæ ßÐáß) áÚÏã æÌæÏ Ïáíá íÎÕÕ ÇáãäÚ ááãÄÐä¡ ÝáÇ ÊáÊÝÊ ÃÎí ÇáãÓáã áãä íÍÑã ÇáÕáÇÉ æÇáÓáÇã Úáì ÇáäÈí ÈÚÏ ÇáÃÐÇä¡ ÝåÐÇ ÃãÑ ÍÓä ÑÖíå ÇáãÓáãæä ãäÐ ÃßËÑ ãä ÓäÉ ÞÑæä¡ æáÇ äÞæá Ãäå æÇÌÈ Ãæ ÝÑÖ áßäå ÃãÑ ÍÓä áÇ íÌæÒ ÊÍÑíãå.

æÝí ÇáÎÊÇã äÞæá ãÇ ÞÇáå Çááå ÊÚÇáì:
"Åöäøó Çááåó æóãóáÇóÆößóÊóåõ íõÕóáøõæäó Úóáóì ÇáäøóÈöíöø íó ÃóíøõåóÇ ÇáøóÐöíäó ÁóÇãóäõæÇ ÕóáøõæÇ Úóáóíúåö æóÓóáøÜöãõæÇ ÊóÓúáöíãÇð".

Çááåã Õá æÓáã æÈÇÑß Úáì ÓíÏäÇ ãÍãÏ ßáãÇ ÐßÑß ÇáÐÇßÑæä æÛÝá Úä ÐßÑß ÇáÛÇÝáæä.

æÇááå ãä æÑÇÁ ÇáÞÕÏ.


(1) ÞÇá ÑÓæá Çááå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã: "ÅÐÇ ÓãÚÊã ÇáãÄÐä ÝÞæáæ ãËáãÇ íÞæá Ëã ÕáæÇ Úáíø"¡ ÑæÇå ãÓáã.

(Change to Arabic settings to read Arabic)

Could you post an interpretation of the meaning of the ayats you have posted (in english)?. We are not all as lucky to know arabic that well!

Jazakallah

Ahmad G either don't reply to posts or if you are going to please give information in ENGLISH and also provide your link. Thankks.


*V~V~V*He came, He saw, He conquered*V~V~V*


----*High Priest-OF-Painful Truth*----

Translation of the Arabic post above.

Bissmillah wassalla llahu ^ala Rasulillah.

Brothers and sisters in Islam, Assalamu ^alaykum, I will clarify what innovation is based on the sayings of the scholars, and topic is specificly about the permissbility of making Salat and Salam on the Prophet after athan.

Allah said in Al Qur’an which means: [Allah and his angles make salat and salam onto the Prophet, o you who believed Make salat and Salam onto him]
Brothers in Islam, know that making Salat on the Prophet (To say May Allah’s peace and blessings be onto the Prophet) after the Athan is a good innovation and not unlawful rather rewardable. What Mu’athins do from making salat and salam after the athan is from the good innovations and it is conducted from the religion as the Prophet Sallallhu ^Alayhi wassallam said in the Hadith related by Muslim: “If you hear Al Mu’athin say as he says than make salat on me” and this is enough to prove that it’s permissible for the Mu’athins to make salat and salam on the Prophet after the athan.
Salat on the Prophet and salam has been initiated by the Mu’athins after every athan at the time of Sultan Haji bin al-Ashraf Sha^ban, Imam As-Suyutiyy said in his book “Al Wasa’il Ila Musamarat Al ‘Awa’il” page 9: “Salat and salam on the Prophet after the athan was initiated in the white minaret at the time of As-Sultan Haji bin Al Ashraf Sha^ban bin Husain bin an-Nasir bin al-Mansoor Qalawoon by the command of Al Muhtassib Najm Ad-Deen at-Tanbady and that was on Sha^ban of 791 H, and before that, at the time of Sultan Salahud-Deen bin Ayoub they used to make Salam on the Prophet every night before the athan of Fajr in Egypt and Sham (Lebanon, Syria, Jordan..) and that continued until the year 776 H and on it by the command of Al Muhtassib Salahud-Deen al Barlasy added: Salat and Salam onto you o Messenger of Allah (Peace and blessings onto you Messenger of Allah) than it was done after every athan year 791 H.
This matter is permissible by Ijma^ (Unanimous agreement) according to the four Mathahib. This also proves that there are good innovations and bad innovations which is the base of our topic.
And here are the sayings from the four schools in the permissibility of the Salat and Salam on the Prophet by the Mu’thins.
- Hanafy (School) Mathhab:
Sheik Muhammad ^Ala’ Ad-Deen Al Hiskfiy in his book “Ad-Dur Al Mukhtar” he said: “Hint: Making Salam after the athan in the month Rabi^ Al Akhir year 781 during the ^Isha’ prayer on Monday night, and on Jumu^ah, and after 10 years the ‘Salam’ was done in all prayers except Al Maghrib and in it twice, and it’s a good innovation” look in Hashiat Ibn ^Abideen 1/390. So he said that there is good innovations and in particular athan is one of them.
The Maliky Mathhab:
Sheikh Shams Ad-Deen Muhammad ^Urfah ad-Dasuqiy Al Maliky said in his Hashiah on As-Sahrh Al Kabeer 1/193: “And for the Salat on the Porphet after the Atahn, it’s an innovation of guidance it was first done at the time of Salahud-Deen Yousuf bin Ayoub”. And here I would like to clarify that the saying of Ad-Dasuqiyy was during the time of the victorious fighter Salahud-Deen Al Ayoubiy who freed Al Aqsa, The salat on an-Nabiy happened prior to athan Al Fajr, but when it became as it is now, done at every athan of the prayers, it was done during the time of Sultan Hajy son of Al Ashraf Sha^ban as we took it from As-Suyoutiy.
The Shafi^y Mathhab:
Al Hafith as-Sakhawiy ash-Shafi^iyy, and he is the student of Al Hafith Ibn Hajar Al ^asqalaniyy, he said in his book: Al Qawl Al Badi^ fis-Salat ^ala Al Habib Ash-Shafee^ (His book: the brilliant say on making Salat on the beloved interceder – Prophet Muhammad) page 92: “The Mu’thins have innovated the salat and salam on the messenger of Allah after the athan for the five prayers except the fajr prayer and Jumu^ah, for they forward that in it on the athan exept al Maghrib they did not do it originally due to it’s limited duration”… Until he said: “and scholars had differences on if it’s recommended or not, bad innovation or lawful, but its permissibility was proven by the saying of Allah which means: [and do the good deed] and it’s clear that making Salat and Salam on the Prophet for being a good deed knowing that the news has confirmed and encouraged on doing that as making the Du^a’ after the athan and the last third of the night and near Fajr time and the fact is that it’s a good innovation and its doer is rewarded with the his good intention” End of the saying of Shafi^iyy.
Hanbaly Mathhab:
In the book “Muntaha Al Iradat” for Al hanabilah 1/113-114: “and it has been a good innovation for the Mu’athin and the one who hears athan to make salat on the Prophet sallallahu ^alayhi wassallam when done and to say: Allahumma Rabba Hathihee-Da^watitammah wassalatil al Qa’imah ….” End of saying.
So these sayings that are from the books of four schools prove that such a doing, making salat and salam on the Prophet is from the good innovations. For, the scholars of the four Mathahib permitted this matter after they saw it happen and they were not silent in clarifying it’s judgment according to Islam. So the four schools all agree on the permissibility on making salat and salam on an-Nabiyy after the athan and they also proved that not every innovation is a bad one, rather there is good innovations as they mentioned and bad innovations.
One might say: according to the aforementioned hadith making salat and salam is only for those who hear the mu’athin not for al Mu’athin himself!
We say what imam an-Nawawiyy said in his book Rawdat At-Talibeen 1/2.3 under the title: “description of the mu’athin and his manners”: “It’s recommended for characteristics of the mu’athin to have a good voice …” till he said “and to make salat and salam on the Prophet sallallahu ^alayhi wassallam by al mu’athin and whomever hears al athan after the athan” end of saying of Nawawiyy.
Also Imam Shams ad-Deen Ar-Ramly, whose known as the small shafi^iyy, in his book :Nihayat Al Muhtaj Ila sharh Al Minhaj” 1/422 he said: “and it’s sunnah for al-Mu’thin and listener to athan as well as stated by hadith related by ibn As-Sunniy and has been mentioned by Al-Musannaf (Meaning Imam An-Nawawiyy) in his Athkar to make salat and salam on the Prophet peace and blesings upon him” end of his saying. And the hadith indicated by Imam ar-Ramliy is the hadith that we are talking about, so ar-Ramliy used this hadith to prove that it’s permissible to make salat on the Prophet by the mu’thin which denotes that it’s a good innovation that was not done on the time of the Prophet. Al Mawlid and other innovations are similarly proved by the scholars for being good innovations, but let it be clear that bad innovations are the most.
So for those who say that every innovation is evil and says that Making salat and salam on the Prophet is unlawful needs to provide the proves for that. Brother and Sister do not look nor care for those who oppose all of these scholars and make it unlawful to make salat and salam after the atahn, for, this matter is good and Muslims have accepted it for more than 600 years. We do not say that it’s obligatory but it’s a good matter it’s unlawful to deem it impermissible.

O Allah raise the rank of the Prophet and grant us his intercession.

To that who oppsed, Still checking references?! Lol, keep checking until your neck twists, at least that instead of your tongue twisting when reading ayat.

The truth is out there, right there!


<<>> Learning the Obligatory Knowledge of the Religion puts the Muslim on the road for excellence and self-betterment. Acquire The Islamic Knowledge!!

Ahmad/Islamic Studies

How about these for references?!! Hah? Now, does any wahaby have any voice left?! any room for lies and fabrications?! If you were sincere, you would admit to the truth rith now!.