Taqseem-e-Hind and Taqseem-e-Kashmir

[janab-e-ali]

@aam_bandha

Perhaps you did not read the UNCIP resolutions or you did not read what i wrote but let me wite it again. Pakistan has to vacate Kashmir COMPLETELY … neither i nor the UNCIP resolution say that Pakistan has to vacate first. While as Indian forces are to stay, albeit in smaller numbers, to provide security for the plebiscite.

It sounds like you’re the one who hasn’t read the UN proposals. UNSC Resolution 47 (1948) was the first to talk of demilitarization followed by plebicite. It clearly states that Pakistan must withdraw first and completely, and then India would withdraw partially. This was unreasonable, and obviously was rejected by Pakistan.

All UN resolutions after 1949 refer to the McNaughton Proposals, which state:

“The aim should be to reduce the armed personnel in the State of Jammu and Kashmir on each side of the Cease-Fire Line to the minimum compatible with the maintenance of security and of local law and order, and to a level sufficiently low and with the forces so disposed that they will not constitute a restriction on the free expression of opinion for the purposes of the plebiscite.”

It goes on to discuss the concept of simultaneous withdrawal of armed forces on both sides of the LoC. Pakistan accepted these terms; India did not. The UN put forward 11 plans on how to carry out the UNSC resolution in accordance with the McNaughton proposals - Pakistan accepted all of them, India rejected them all.

[/QUOTE]
India has talks with Pakistan and then there are new rulers and it is back to square one. Look at this too, the foreign minister of Pakistan says there are no papers of Kashmir talks with foreign office !!!
[/QUOTE]

India and Pakistan can negotiate out whatever they want…the matter won’t be resolved until the wishes of the Kashmiri people are taken into account. Time and time again, Kashmiris have demonstrated that they want nothing to do with Indian occupation.