Re: Tamil Tigers to launch air strikes on Hindustan
That's not the correct characterization.
The correct characterization is --- LTTE is a politically motivated seperatist/terrorist organization of Tamil language-ethnic minorities of Sri Lanka, majority of LTTE just happen to be Hindus.
dude, perhaps you speak that way but i highly doubt you'll find anyone else describing it like that. Tamil tigers are widely described as Tamils, not Tamil language-ethnic minorities of Sri Lanka. Likewise they can be described as Hindu without adding the "just happen to be" in between.
[quote]
Agree, except the bold......becuase while by Hindu terrorists if you mean only composition and NOT ideology....then definately by any logic you have to put the sentence like I said before ---- Majority of them happen to be Hindus.
[/quote]
why do you have to put "majority of them happen to be" before Hindus? does anyone say "majority of them happen to speak" French people of France? Or "majority of them happen to be" short batsmen of Bangladesh?
To be logically correct, you merely have to intend to use Hindu to connote composition (although as the reference suggests, it might also be ideology) to say Hindu militants and it is FINE. It may also be correct that "a majority of them happen to be Hindus" but one truth does not exclude another.
[quote]
How come you can refer an organization as a religious group (Hindu) but at the same time the movement is not for protection/propagation of religion/religious ideology.
[/quote]
I already gave you many examples of groups referred to by their religion but they do no exist for the propagation of that religion. Algeria is a Muslim country. Morocco is a Muslim country. Fatah is a Muslim (but not Islamist) organization. None of these groups have the stated aim of propogation of Islam, but nobody says Fatah is a group "that happens to be" Muslim. Fatah is a Muslim group.
[quote]
They are Tamils first and Hindus later.....reason for their Unity is NOT Hinduism but the language Tamil.
[/quote]
I thought they werent "Tamils" they were "politically motivated seperatist/terrorist organization of Tamil language-ethnic minorities of Sri Lanka"? See how you condense it to Tamils when it suits you? Suppose there is a Tamil who doesnt like the LTTE or disagrees completely with your ideology (as you said many exist in India, im sure one or two must in Sri Lanka too), would he be right to quarrel with you right now?
[quote]
The person blowing himself up from LTTE can be a majority Hindu, a Christian and an Atheist....but definately all of them are Tamil and blowing themselves-up for the cause of seperate Tamil eelum and NOT for Hindutva or similiar ideology.
Many of LTTE followers are atheists.
Many in Tamilnadu are atheists.
[/quote]
Sure. Many Fatah soldiers are also Christians. Many Hezbollah soldiers are also Christians. Many people in Algeria are Christians. Are all these no longer Muslim organizations/countries then?
[quote]
This is a classic example of selective interpretation of Bhagwad-Gita!!
First of all my simple question to Calgary University-- show me a verse where Lord Krishna commands Arjuna specifically that suicide is justified or taking one's own life.
At least I don't know any such interpretation.
Further regarding justification of war....yess it's 100% true that Lord Krishna commands Arjuna to fight a war.
probably university of Calgary needs to know a lot more how the war started and in which circumstances Lord Krishna revealed Bhagwad-Gita.
Just in brief...Pandavas were first denied their state, as a last step to avoid war when they begged for just five villages--that also they were denied. Hence the war became the only means.
Now coming back to BhagwadGita and the verses...
Before interpreting one should know the scene, the circumstances, the characters and conditions in determining the reasons for revealation of BhagwadGita.
The scene is a battlefield of Krukshetra and witnesses are millions of soldiers and their commanders.
The circumstance of revealation of Gita is a war and reason was the attachment of Arjuna with his own kinsman and family members and his fear of loosing the near and dear ones.
The Chapter no.2 of Gita reveals the "eternal reality of soul's immorality" but definately it does not command that you can achieve Immorality by just killing others or blowing yourself-up.....at least that's my understanding.
[/quote]
There are ALWAYS differences in interpretations. There are ALWAYS people in any religious group who can take teachings and use them for their aims, whether those are war or peace.
Dont Muslims exist who deny that the violent interpretations of Al-Qaida? Does that mean that those violent interpretations are not used?
These are NOT the views of people from UCalgary. It is citing reports of Tamil Tigers using Hinduism for propaganda and motivation. You may disagree with their interpretations but that doesnt change the fact that those interpretations are being used to further the militancy. Thereby your claim here..
[quote]
I have never heard a news where Tamil tigers are recruited giving them lectures of Vedanta or stories of Puranas.......already told it is impossible to invent an ideology similiar to Ummah or equivalent---it never exists in Dharma.
[/quote]
... is completely debunked. Atleast now you know that Tamil Tigers do infact recruit with propaganda videos based on Hindu traditions.
[quote]
I brought up India into it because majority of Indians are Hindus and South India has Hindu Mathas of Sankaracharyas, but LTTE neither have sympathy from Right wing Hindus nor do they have sympathy from Mathas of Sankarachryas beacuse their fight is not for the cause of Hindutva as simple as that.
[/QUOTE]
I dont know much about Indian internal politics or who/what Mathas is, so cant really take you up on that. But every country is different. Pakistanies are Muslims and by and large dont approve of the work of (Muslim) Algerian seperatists.