Ravage I wrote
‘So every anti-mush-mqm person is now a jihadi’, so what is so wrong with that, that you had to delete it and give me warnings for that? I mean if you read it, its exactly what YOU wrote in the topic!
2 Likes
Re: People opposing Musharraf are secretly rooting for Taliban [split: Lal masjid..]
Soon I am open up a thread about "M" word.
People need to understand us better and they don't need to be so sensitive about a little thing, as political affiliation.
Me talking about mqm.
Re: People opposing Musharraf are secretly rooting for Taliban [split: Lal masjid..]
well pro-mushy-BB-MQM ppl can spew as much hatred as they want against anyone thats anti-mushy-BB-MQM but to say anything against mushy…ohh no no no no…not allowed at all. only thing allowed is to praise mushy as much as you can otherwise they’ll lable you a terrorist, pro-taliban and then you are doomed. :halo: 
Re: People opposing Musharraf are secretly rooting for Taliban [split: Lal masjid..]
spock, I missed the "MQM" part until another poster pointed it out. the topic was Musharraf, and the only reason you put MQM in there is because you do the same damn thing in EVERY thread where khehkeshan posts, talk about MQM or Altaf. It gets repetetive and pointless, because it becomes the logical end of EVERY discussion.
I dont want to keep babysitting the two groups over and over again. if the topic is about MQM, talk about MQM. If the topic is Altaf, talk about Altaf. If you keep going out of your way to continue your tete a tete with posters on their political backgrounds regardless of topic, then you will keep gettings posts removed, and you will keep getting points.
I repeat, it does not matter which political affiliation you keep dragging into every discussion, it is the irrelevance of your continuing feuds to the specific topic being discussed.
Im moving these posts to Feedback, where you can continue this discussion if you want.
FYI the moved post was:
So every anti-dictator/anti-altaf person is a jihadi kerkashan? lol
and the warning was for the part bolded.
Re: Talking about MQM/Mush gets you warnings? split from: People opposing Musharraf
That is just silly ravage, warning ppl now for even mentioning his holiness Altaf bhai! First you guys couldnt tolerate name calling of Altaf bhai and musharraf sarkaar, whereas maulana diesel and butthole was perfectly fine... Ive pointed out selective moderating to Ehsan bhai on seperate occasions...
its a political forum and we should be allowed to mention any politicians we want, though I can understand name calling not being allowed but this is just pointless... Altaf Bhai and Musharraf are allies, so we are bound to criticize them both if someone comes out here and calls us jihadiz or talibans...
And yeah, I dont care about warning points either, I was banned previously for even posting a feedback query for a day for no reason so this warning sharning system makes no sense to me....
Re: Talking about MQM/Mush gets you warnings? split from: People opposing Musharraf
look i know you're not dumb, so either you're ignoring what I said, in which case there is no point in me responding, or you're merely trying to obfuscate the issue deliberately.
you were not warned because you mentioned person X, you were warned because you persist in derailing every other thread into an argument about person X based on another poster's affiliation with him, inspite of being asked not to.
You can talk about Altaf all you want where its relevant but dont make every thread into the same, ongoing, repetetive, unresolved piss-take.
Musharraf is allies with a lot of people, I cant believe that you merely picked Altaf from that list because hes an ally with Musharraf, and not because the person you were responding to had the nick "Khehkeshan"
Re: Talking about MQM/Mush gets you warnings? [split from: People opposing Musharraf
Spoke jigger: I hope I can tell you something... and I hope I will get my point across... It is true that the quotation posted by ravage does not look any insult in anyway.. it is rather a query... and a genuine one... however, I do no want to tell you or anyone how good or ridiculous the decision seems to me and on whatever "previous assumed notions" it has been taken, but I will tell you this:
[quote]
Convincing oneself of the fact that we are part of an imperfect world, rids one of many insolvable puzzles. The idea is not about forgoing principles — the idea is to save the life from unnecessary hassles in the name of pursing principles.
[/quote]