Taliban: The followers of pre-Islamic dark lords of blood sacrifice and cannibalism

Seeing the blood lust, limb chopping, and heinous crimes against humanity, these Talibans are following the pre-Islamic dark lords who needed blood sacrifices and cannibalism.

BLOOD SACRIFICE
By RALPH PETERS

January 13, 2009 –
WELL-MEANING Western commentators make a grave error when they insist that Islamist terrorists want to drag the Muslim world back to the seventh century.

It’s much worse than that.

Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban and related fanatics really want to take their homelands (and the rest of the world) back beyond the era of Mohammed - to the grisly ancient days of human sacrifice.

The Prophet sought to purify the idolatrous devotions of his people, to do away with heartless desert cults. He felt the fervor of one living god and shared his illumination. The faith that arose in his wake had epochs of glory and eras of infamy, but it endured.

Now Islam is under assault from within, under attack from nominal Muslims who believe their vision supersedes that of Mohammed. They invoke the name of Allah but behave in the manner of ancient priests whose robes were drenched in blood.

What’s the meaning of those beheading videos and suicide bombings, the slaughter of fellow Muslims and the exploitation by pagan cults, such as Hamas, of masses of the faithful as human shields? Why stone 13-year-old girls to death? What’s this celebration of blood lust all about?

It’s about the threatened collapse of the Middle East back into an age of human sacrifice - the precise sort of gruesome travesty the Prophet inveighed against.

Today’s “Muslim” terrorists have nothing to do with Islam’s golden ages. They belong to the days of winged devil-gods and stone altars stinking of clotted human blood.

The true enemies of Islam aren’t Americans or Europeans or even Israelis, all of whom could not care less what backwater Middle Easterners call their god. The worst enemies of the Muslim faith are the butchers convinced that Allah demands that rivers of blood be shed to praise his name.

The reluctance of many Muslims to speak out against this travesty - this perversion - of their faith has various causes. In North America, it’s largely the age-old fear of the new arrival, unsure of his place in a foreign society and wary of alienating members of his immigrant community.

In the greater Middle East, however, the compulsion to remain silent in the face of faith-fueled atrocities is a product of fatalism, of centuries of self-wrought failure and humiliation, and of self-loathing.

In its desert heartlands, Islam became a religion in which outward conformity was more important than inner faith. The obsession with behavioral norms has threatened all major religions from time to time, but Islam (the faith of “submission”) became so prescriptive that it blocked the Middle East from joining the modern world.

Westerners care about how things work. Middle Easterners care about how things look.

One profound contrast has to do with dishonor. The archetypal Westerner feels dishonored when he shames his conscience, even if no one else learns of his misdeed. In the Middle East, shame is all about the public space - if no one knows what you did, there’s no dishonor. Western literature is rich with figures torn by a crisis of conscience, but there is no Muslim Hamlet or Lord Jim.

Apologists for Islam Gone Wild love to cite the moral and intellectual grandeur of Muslim Cordoba and Granada. But the lasting legacy of Islam on the Mediterranean’s shores was an obsession with public honor, with female chastity and macho pride. The inner spiritual life thrived north of the Alps. In the south, you just had to look good.

The outward forms prescribed by centuries of Islamic judges and scholars have become a paralyzing burden. Unable to adapt to the modern world, Middle Eastern Islam’s a museum-piece faith. Muslims feel trapped, and they dare not explore why.

This feeling of being cornered, of being humiliated by competitor faiths that evolve and triumph, has led frustrated Muslims into an impulsive rejection of Mohammed’s humane principles and purposes.

The blood-cult terrorists piling up corpses in tribute to their darkness-shrouded god have nothing - nothing - to do with the Prophet Mohammed. Their roots go far, far deeper, reaching down into a hellish past of priests with knives and serpent-infested temples.

Track down the terrorist video that made the rounds a few years back in which an executioner licks the blood of his victim from his knife.

That’s not piety but cannibalism.

Ralph Peters keeps the Koran beside his reading chair, along with seven Bibles.

http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/01132009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/blood_sacrifice_149872.htm

This author is right when he says:

**Track down the terrorist video that made the rounds a few years back in which an executioner licks the blood of his victim from his knife.

That's not [Islamic] piety but [pre-Islamic traditions of] cannibalism.**

Re: Taliban: The followers of pre-Islamic dark lords of blood sacrifice and cannibali

Finally people realise these men are not muslims! Good one Posh. It took you what a decade but you finally got there.

Yes. Pak newspapers should call them Kafirs.

Their mosques should be called temples, and the their religious book should be called different from being called Quran. Their religious schools should be called Kafir schools and hence banned for their anti-human teachings.

Are you willing to go along?

Re: Taliban: The followers of pre-Islamic dark lords of blood sacrifice and cannibali

^ Their mosques should be called temples. Why?If they are not muslims then they are also not hindus. Terrorists have no religion because every religion is against terrorism.
Temple is a holy place for hindu-community.

Calm down Dove.

Temple is a generic word as in "Pagan temple". Many churches use the word temple as part of their name. So temple is not reserved for Hindus.

If someone uses the word "Mundir" then you have every right to be upset.

Re: Taliban: The followers of pre-Islamic dark lords of blood sacrifice and cannibali

As always not only do you come up with lame brain ideas, this time they are beyond absurd. The Quran is the Quran. Regardless of what you want, most muslims take pride in the fact that ours isn't rewritten every few hundred years.

Dove however has it right. You can learn something from him and give up your unabashed hatred.

Re: Taliban: The followers of pre-Islamic dark lords of blood sacrifice and cannibali

Before labeling anyone kafir, let us understand one thing. People who are blowing up themselves are our own people & the people who used them for so long to advance narrow minded idiotic ideology were our generals. So our jihadi monster is homemade & we're responsible for our won miseries.

Abu Jahil was our Messenger pbuh's uncle (according to many traditions) and yet he was the sworn enemy of Islam.

Talibans are kuffar and they are no longer "our own people". How could they?

Blowing up schools of our future generations can never be "our own people".

I usually read your posting with respect as I admire truth. But poor burqaposhx you will soon be treated as a Kuffuar by the ‘champions’ of Islam.

If anyone thinks that Hezbollah and Hamas are the same as the Taliban and al-Qaeda, then they truly are mental patients who belong in an insane asylum.

Ralph Peters has never read the Quran, he just gets a boner when a Muslim child is killed by an Israeli terrorist.