Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

**21st century does not mean we as human have become any better than people from previous centuries in terms of what is right and what is wrong mean.

Using 'modern' time frame to show some goodness in people in their hearts and sincerety is a flawed argument.
**
All it means that we have been able to produce better non-human objects.

In fact one may say idiots, hypocrites and irreligious people with biased but strong hold on world communication and resources are growing faster than simple, nice, inactive and wise people who have not much control on the world resources and communication.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Ok

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

I did not misinterpret ... You miscommunication and sorta chose to be a bit pedantic.

Beheading is not the Shari'ah punishment for adultery ... It is stoning to death ...

Yes adultery may still occur ... If it happens behind closed doors it is better for society. Many people will avoid this practice through a moral framework, others may see it to be okay to do it because they can see others have done it and gotten away with it. The hard nosed adulterer will of course go ahead and do it anyway, but those people who are concerned for their life in this world and hereafter will be getting second thoughts for thinking of adultery ...

The threat of punishment does deter such activities from becoming common ... Additionally, society will generally view it to be bad practice because such a punishment is attached to it.
This taboo needs to remain in place.

Ghost14 ... You call yourself Muslim so then read up what the purpose of the Islamic penal system is ... There are clear evidences to suggests that if a person repents and seeks out punishment for their sins then their punishment in he hereafter is reduced or even their sins can be considered purged.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

When has adultery ever NOT occurred behind closed doors Psyah saab? Very curious as to where in the world adultery is committed OUT in the open?

What society do you know of where Adultery is no longer considered a taboo? Even in the Godless west, people go to pains to conceal their infidelity... I mean really, tell me of one example where adultery is no longer taboo? If any society deems the act of extra marital relations as being "adultery," isnt that very act of defining in itself an acknowledgment of the taboo status of the act?!?!

Since when has CLEAR EVIDENCE to SUGGEST something ever prevented you from simply believing what you wanted too?!?! :)
Seems to me like clear evidence is something you only acknowledge when it suits you, no?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Good ... then you agree that this punishment is more of a deterent than a cruel barabaric means to control people - because neither does adultery happen openly nor should people get punished with the hudd punishment ... their punishment should be somewhat lower than the hudd (maximum) punishment for the crime we are talking about ... The people of those places who act quickly to use maximum punishment are misguided as much as those people who feel the penal laws of Islam have been outdated.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

i think its cruel when its actually practiced.

beyond that, I think its redundant, considering its taboo in almost every culture, regardless of whether they are Islamic or not.

And the taboo associated with adultery looks to persist, regardless of whether its deemed sinful by religion or not.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

The taboo is because of religion and if a culture should change it to being a choice then would you follow? I also think the punishment is cruel ... That is why if I had no morals I would be scared of committing adultery. Of course the law does not bother me, because I have other reasons not to commit adultery ... I feel the law should not bother other either. Redundant it is not however ... there have been cases when people have insisted to be given the penalty in this life after they repented and realised their sin. Despite RasoolAllah (SAW) being hesitant he (SAW) gave the orders for the woman who insisted that she gets her penalty here rather than later.

Anyway now you seem to have a better idea of this particular Islamic law - I rather you think it redundant than being unnecessarily barbaric ... It must be a very bad thing to have such a severe punishment and if it has come from God as the Muslims believe then we should reflect at the problems adultery can cause to society rather than look at the punishment. Is there enough to argue that adultery ruins the fabric of society?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Whether its a taboo because of religion or not is debatable. The institute of marriage between one man and one woman is far older then any religion. Suffice it to say that its a complex sociological issue which cannot be examined within the confines of our humble forum.

I have a better understanding of this particular INTERPRETATION of this Islamic law, but I doubt those who practice stoning will agree with you. Plus, im not the audience you should be trying to convince.

The law doesnt bother you because in your interpretation, the law only exists on paper, and is only used when the apparent sinner decides to confess and suffer the consequences by their own volition. That seems unlikely, but lets assume its possible. The problem however, is that in reality, religious laws rarely stay on paper. There will always the extremists in the society who will take it from simply existing on paper to practice in real life. Their will always be the likes of the Taliban dragging people into the streets for stoning sessions. People like you may be well meaning, but as soon as you open the religious box, out pop the catalyst for all sorts of evils done in its name.

You could make a similar case for the Blasphemy law in Pakistan. You might assume that it exists as a deterrent, that it is only on paper, but we have seen how its abused. We have seen that it doesnt work. What makes you so confident that the existence of this law, even if only as a deterrent, will not have a similar effect?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

If I understand Psyahs nuanced position, adultery punishment is stoning to death. It is normally only applied if the adulterer wants that punishment in order to be absolved of since after death. And that the punishment is typically not as severe - though not clear exactly what that punishment is. ( I browsed quickly and this is what I gathered. I could be wrong).

There is a thread about majority of millionaires in Pakistan not paying any taxes. What is the proper punishment for tax evasion by the wealthy?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

It is indeed possible for people to be caught and if seen and verified by more then 3 people, the causes established and seen that only the people involved are responsible then yes hudd can be applied in addition. But it is very hard to argue the position of hudd.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Pakistanis pay bribes instead of taxes ... :) ... They get given the option to pay half of their tax or bill and they opt for it the person offering pockets the money and then gives them back a clean sheet. Taxation as a system needs to be cleaned up before people can be charged for not paying tax. The rich are often more powerful than the courts too ... because of the bribery culture they can end up paying their way out of custody unless of course there are other rich people who want to pin them down ... Islamic law tax is not necessary for Muslims, but there are other measures in place to get money for state purposes. The most appropriate process of getting money in these situations is to follow the process of law, write letters if no go involve debt collectors solicitors, if no go then involve courts, if verdict given then send bailiffs, etc ...

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

adultery punishment is stoning to death ????

According to Qur'an ????

Please enlighten me

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

This is what i found in the Holy Qur'an about. But Death Punishment isn't mentioned.

24:2 The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.

24:3 Let no man guilty of adultery or fornication marry and but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever: nor let any but such a man or an Unbeliever marry such a woman: to the Believers such a thing is forbidden.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

How can I enlighten he who seeks not his enlightenment from Allah (SWT) but from me?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

To apply a sentence of death on anyone, requires a degree of evidence which seems almost unobtainable. Short of filming the act itself, I dont see any way one could prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that two people are engaging inromantic activity. That is assuming adultery is not broadly defined as ANY contact between two unmarried people. Any evidence then that does not prove that they are romantically involved then would simply be conjecture, and basing a sentence of death on such evidence would just be pretense and so unjustifiable. So yes, it is a very difficult thing to prove.

But as you yourself said, the sentence of death by stoning is extreme. And I think the belief that it works as a deterrent is more an assumption then something based on actual fact. Human nature i understand, and one thing about amorous couples, they never allow the fear of death stand in the way of their "love."

And on a separate note, while the vows of marriage are sacred, are those vows still considered valid if your marriage is one that is forced? So you know as well as i that in many Islamic (and non Islamic) countries, you do not have the choice of partners, despite the assertion by your faith that you do. Now the pressure to marry a particular person can be great. The nikkah ceremony may ask give you that final option to decline the proposal, but how often does that happen considering your entire "khandan" is behind you? So does application of anti Adultery laws in Islam, not assume that the marriage is by mutual consent without pressure and the option of divorce is available, even though it often is not in the case f many traditional marriages?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

Peace Med911

Now you are arguing for argument's sake. The topic is drifting away from the issue of the punishment towards proving the act ... The actual topic subject is about the Taliban who didn't admit to the chopping off of the heads ... And in fact it is no where in Shar'iah that heads are being chopped off. We can leave this other discussion for another day shall we?

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

wah kya baat hai ..... btw do u know that i don't seek enlightenment fron Allah SWT ????

to my post: I thought u were around and could reply with a qur'anic reference ..... not that i expect u, me or any other Person to spent the whole day at GS

After a bit waiting i just searched myself and thus my second reply with the Reference .... i hope this clears it up a bit

Peace

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

You're saying something slightly different now. I always agreed that hard nosed adulterers will cheat, and that punishment can deter some people. My contention is that **violent **punishments are unnecessary (be it beheading or stoning), as financial and social repercussions are enough.

If you think that violent punishments are necessary and that they have a place in the penal system, then we can agree to disagree.

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :-(

I thought we were finished talking about the Taliban...

Re: Taliban cut off heads of 17 people for having music at party :frowning:

:rotfl:

That’s a classic!