Taliban At it Again

I don’t get this whole “good taliban” policy. I hope after the murder of > 100 kids in Peshawar, the military in Pakistan has given up on supporting them. One would think so with the current military offensive against extremists in Pakistan.

However, who is now funding the Taliban in Kunduz??

What is the purpose of funding these animals? All they do is create more trouble. Can’t people tell they’re not different than ISIS, and Boko Haram and all these other barbaric movements??

And what does anyone get from putting arms in THEIR hands?

Re: Taliban At it Again

Intelligence, perhaps. But I don’t think Taliban need Pakistani financial support. They have enough going with millions of dollars poured into Afghan war by the USA.

Who is funding the Afghan Taliban? You don?t want to know

…Now administration officials have launched a search for Taliban sponsors. Richard Holbrooke, U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told a press conference in Islamabad last month that drugs accounted for less of a share of Taliban coffers than was previously thought.

“In the past there was a kind of feeling that the money all came from drugs in Afghanistan,” said Holbrooke, according to media reports. “That is simply not true.”

The new feeling is that less than half of the Taliban’s war chest comes from poppy, with a variety of sources, including private contributions from Persian Gulf states, accounting for much of the rest. Holbrooke told reporters that he would add a member of the Treasury Department to his staff to pursue the question of Taliban funding.

But perhaps U.S. officials need look no further than their own backyard.

Anecdotal evidence is mounting that the Taliban are taking a hefty portion of assistance money coming into Afghanistan from the outside.
This goes beyond mere protection money or extortion of “taxes” at the local level — very high-level negotiations take place between the Taliban and major contractors, according to sources close to the process.

A shadowy office in Kabul houses the Taliban contracts officer, who examines proposals and negotiates with organizational hierarchies for a percentage. He will not speak to, or even meet with, a journalist, but sources who have spoken with him and who have seen documents say that the process is quite professional.

The manager of an Afghan firm with lucrative construction contracts with the U.S. government builds in a minimum of 20 percent for the Taliban in his cost estimates. The manager, who will not speak openly, has told friends privately that he makes in the neighborhood of $1 million per month. Out of this, $200,000 is siphoned off for the insurgents.

If negotiations fall through, the project will come to harm — road workers may be attacked or killed, bridges may be blown up, engineers may be assassinated…

Re: Taliban At it Again

UN report detailing Taliban fighter deaths warns of force’s illicit funding | World news | The Guardian


The Taliban remains a powerful and well-funded force, the report says, with the movement raising $155m in 2012 from illegal opium production.
Although the amount of protection money that insurgents receive from security companies employed to guard Nato supply convoys has fallen as foreign forces close bases, the report says 2014 is expected to be a bumper year as the alliance ships huge amounts of equipment out of the country.

It also warns that the Taliban is skimming profit off illegally mined gemstones, including rubies and emeralds. Afghanistan has an estimated $1tn worth of mineral reserves, which it is hoped will eventually help to pay for the country’s 352,000-strong security force…

Re: Taliban At it Again

a good amount of money given by USA to Karzai government landed in the hands of taliban. That was admitted by the Americans.

Re: Taliban At it Again

to answer your questions: It is about control by other means. Post 2004 was pak policy to leave some assets intact so Afghanistan couldn't turn hostile. This policy has been a debacle. More pakistanis have died at the hands of Afghanistan blowback and proxy wars than with all the wars against India. Yet sorting out the issues between the two rarely gets attention (unlike india policy)

Funds wise they have gotten a lot from existing cash but also get a stream of volunteers from pak plus raw material to make bombs. Rest the capture.