Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

This is like the 3rd or 4th time in as many months that the Supreme Court has asked the media, especially the Geo / Jang/ News group to apologise for printing lies about the judiciary.

Just shows people should not believe everything written or reported by certain sections of the Pak media.

Reporter apologises to SC for ‘baseless report’

The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday reprimanded a reporter who filed a story claiming that the government was preparing misconduct references against four more judges of the apex court. A 13-member full court, which is hearing the petition of the chief justice of Pakistan challenging the presidential reference against him, took suo motu notice of the story and summoned the reporter, who tendered an unconditional apology for filing the “baseless and unauthentic” story. The court accepted the apology of Saleh Zaafir, a reporter for Jang and The News, but issued him a stern warning. The bench ordered the two newspapers to publish Zaafir’s apology on their front pages.
**When the head of the bench, Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday, asked the reporter if he had any proof as to the authenticity of his story, Zaafir admitted he did not and apologised. He said he would not commit the same mistake in future if were forgiven this time. **

The court passed the following order, asking journalists to print it verbatim:

“Muhammad Saleh Zaafir, editor special reporting, of daily Jang and The News, has entered appearance on our call, in connection with the news items appearing in the Rawalpindi edition of the daily Jang and the daily The News of 11th June, 2007, regarding some references being made against four senior honourable judges of this court who, presumably also happen to be members of this bench. The said news item appeared to be open to further serious exception because such a news item had been published, more than boldly, on the front pages of the said two newspapers on the day when this bench was expected to announce its decision on the maintainability of the petitions filed in this court questioning the presidential reference against the honourable chief justice of Pakistan. It may be added that certain insinuations had been made in the said news items pointing towards some alleged misconduct committed by the four un-named senior judges of this court. Muhammad Saleh Zaafir, who is the reporter of the said news items, when confronted with the same, frankly and honestly conceded that he had made no effort to verify the veracity of the allegations levelled in the said news items before publishing the same nor did he have any proof in support of the contents thereof. He, however, added at the very outset that he had utmost regards and respect for not only the said honourable judges of this court but for the entire judiciary; that he did not have even an iota of doubt about their integrity and character and that reporting the said news items was a grave mistake on his part. He tendered verbal unconditional apologies in open court and also placed on record his statement to the above noted effect, in writing. The regrets offered by Muhammad Saleh Zaafir, reporter/editor, appear to be sincere and the remorse expressed by him appears to be genuine. In this view of the matter, we do not consider it necessary to proceed with the matter any further except warning him to be careful in future. On our call, Muhammad Afzal Butt, President of the Rawalpindi-Islamabad Union of Journalists, also entered appearance for assistance. The reporting of the proceedings which have taken place in court in connection with the matter in question shall be made only to the extent that the apology tendered by the said Muhammad Saleh Zaafir shall be published in full and so would be published this order passed thereon. The daily Jang and the daily The News which had published the news items in question, shall publish the said apology and this order, prominently, on their front pages. Muhammad Saleh Zaafir undertakes to do the same and has been ordered accordingly.”

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\06\13\story_13-6-2007_pg7_3

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

Correct. There is so much jealousy and hatred for the progress Pakistan has made under the so called dictator, that the supporters of ‘bhagorays and lootairays’ will do anything to try and undermine the man that has saved Pakistan from turning into a basket case .

Pakistan Zindabad :jhanda:

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

THREE times in the last months the Supreme Court has warned the Geo News / Jang / News group for reporting/printing lies about judges - that is a pretty telling fact.

There is no doubt now that after strike 3 against the Geo/News group that they have told lies after lies which some in the general public have believed, making them the most irresponsible jounalists around. They have no doubt caused great damage to national institutions by spreading such lies, and the Supreme Court and Govt need to work together to put checks on this.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

JUDICIAL WARNING No. 1 to GEO NEWS / JANG / NEWS GROUP - March 9, 2007.

TV channel tenders apology

**LAHORE, March 9: The Geo TV network on Friday tendered an unconditional apology before a full bench of the Lahore High Court in a contempt of court case. The proceedings had been initiated against the channel for telecasting a programme in which a high court official was shown taking bribe. The court termed the programme an attempt to ‘lower the dignity of the courts’. **Chairman of the network Mir Shakilur Rehman stated before the bench that information relating to courts shown in the programme was incorrect. He said though the facts could have been verified before airing the programme yet regrettably no such verification was done. He further said the channel never intended to cast any aspersion on the court and if at all any such impression had been created the same was sincerely regretted. The court after considering the apology ordered that in order to demonstrate bona fide and sincerity of what had been stated before the court, the respondent channel show regret/apology daily at appropriate timings till next date on March 12.

http://www.dawn.com/2007/03/10/top9.htm

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

JUDICIAL WARNING No. 2 to GEO NEWS / JANG / NEWS GROUP - May 9, 2007.

“Likewise Kamran Khan Show telecast by GEO TV on 5th May 2007 and repeated later on and other similar programmes telecast by other channels were an instance of sensational reporting aimed at scandalizing and maligning the Hon. Judges of the Supreme Court within the ambit of the provisions of the law relating to the contempt of court”.

http://thenews.jang.com.pk/updates.asp?id=22157

SC sets strict guidelines for media: Restrictions on entry to courts](http://www.dawn.com/2007/05/10/top1.htm)

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

Now.

JUDICIAL WARNING No. 3 to GEO NEWS / JANG / NEWS GROUP - June 12, 2007.

Journalist apologises to apex court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday summoned a journalist and warned him for publishing a news item suggesting initiation of references by the government against four senior judges who were part of the 13-member larger bench hearing the petition of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, and warned him to be careful in future.

http://www.dawn.com/2007/06/13/nat5.htm

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

And Saleh Zaafir is one of the so called ‘senior journalists’ on the scene.:hoonh:

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

:)

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

Well people minded the govt trying to bring “controls” to the actions of this kind by the media, so the Supreme Court has been forced to do it. But are the likes of Geo News / Jang / News taking any notice?

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

and now a days another crap reporting "FARISHTA told me..." by Ansar Abbasi is running in JUNG. Basically Jung group (jung, the news and Geo) are doing aggressive biased reporting. They are fast to condemn the acts of govt in 'MAIREY MUTABAQ" and "AAJ KAMRAN KHAN K SAATH" but I have yet to see a program on condemning the lawyers who said "ager supreme court ka faisla theek na howa tu JUDGES apney ghar naheee ja sakeen gaay"

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

:hehe: yes I read some of the reports by Ansar Abbasi of the CJ consulting “angels” and telling them of his side of the story. Truly trashy journalism.

http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=8427

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

^Thanx for sharing the article. Abbasi has written very valid points in defense of CJ, lets see if writers supported by government and MQM can come up with a rebuttal.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

Ansar Abbasi is prolly the trashiest journalist in any of English dailies today. I tried searching for his email or contact no. for a little feedback but no luck.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

Abbasi is becoming crap day by day. If he has so valid information against the govt why he don't give it out. I am sick and tired of this "parday main rehnay do parda na uthaoo" journalism in Pakistan. Govt, journalist , political leaders etc care so much about the AWAM that they don't tell them the complete story jaisey pata nahi kia qayamat aa jayee gee. All they end up with is "WAQAT aaney per main raaaz sai parda uthoooon ga" ya "ABHEE YEE AWAM K MAFAD main nahi hai k unheen complete story bataee jaeey".

Other day Abbai wrote something to the effect that "I have a verified news that a very respectable person in Islamabad leaves his home every night and has met with 10 other very respectable persons in Islamabad......" I mean what kind of crap journalism is this (if you can call it journalism at all). Give the name of those 11 respected persons, tell people what those 11 persons were doing/talking about and let AWAM decide. Dont try to sell your TV time or news paper just by SUN-SANEE-KHAIZ reporting!

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

Thats what I am talking about. Absolute trash.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

When people like Ansar Abbasi write in favour of the CJ they do him no great service - in fact the opposite. Especially when they cite "angels" or unnamed people as their sources. It is because of people like Abbasi that the Supreme Court has thrice warned the Geo News / Jang / News group for their speculative, misleading and false reports, particularly in respect to the judiciary.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

Ive been saying this abt Ansar all along, he's one of the worst affected by the I've become a hero syndrome among the journalists this season.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

True Dc6!
And unfortunately thats excatly what all channels/papers and their staffers are doing by default.

Who knows who has done what for better ratings, greater hero status (thus package, job security and celebrity status enhancement) and ofcourse greater revenues, sympathy and cost-free advertisement the world over through certain antics.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about "references"

The information given in the article in defence of CJ will be produced by his lawyers in SC, not by Abbasi.

Re: Supreme Court gets Reporter to apologise for baseless reports about “references”

although this column is also a crap but i was not talking about any specific column. He has these “chupatey bhee nahee , batatey bhee nahee” sort of columns in jung/the news every day. For example read this article by Ansar Abbasi. What community service is he doing by articles like this. This is not even a half truth and btw half truth is worst than a lie !