Re: Suicide bomber kills 32 people in Darra Adam Khel
Crescent would of course defend the Taliban and other warlord thugs saying that no one has claimed the responsibility yet.
The only people worse than these are the people who live in denial and create the environment which enables these terrorists to continue their destruction. These are people who are so blinded by their hatred of all "non-Muslims", that they are ready to defend all acts of Taliban, even when its murder and mayhem against their own people.
Inna lillahi wa inna illahi rajioun,
The only people worse than these are actually the ones who base their opinions on speculation. They fall under the deceptive veil, which has actually lifted itself from time to time, yet they choose not to escape it. This is one of literally daily "false" flag operations. The U.N. has volumes of confessiosn by former Algerian army soldiers during the early years of the Algerian civil war in 1995, who admitted that they were drugged by their seniors and conducted raids in villages attacking civilians dressed as "mujahideen." In Palestine there was the Levan affair. A third of Laos was secretly bombed by the U.S. during the Vietnam war, a fact that the CIA leaked much later.
Tell me, does anyone here know who killed Bhutto? Well I do not claim to know for sure. But let's look at the evidence, the obvious conclusion, and what's being reported. Immediately the state media blamed the mujahideen in Waziristan. Yet, the gun used to shoot her is found ONLY among an elite unit of the Pakistani army. Remember how Musharraf kept denying that a bullet killed her, even though everyone could SEE the clip with their own eyes? Secondly, the head of the Waziristani resistence established direct communication with Bhutto's party twice, according to Bhutto's own party, and confirmed that they had nothing to do with it, and that their only enemy was the Americans. Yet, who was blamed? The waziri tribes.
Also, Several months ago, a school in the north west of Pakistan was bombed. It was surrounded by 3 helicopter gunships, and torn to shreds. roughly 100 people inside, 80% of them students, were shred to pieces. The media reported that the parents that dropped their children off to school in the morning, were picking their pieces up in the afternoon. Initially, the Pakistani army claimed responsibility. The public was outraged, but as Pakistan was ruled (and still is ruled) by the military, the rage was brutally suppressed. 3 days later, the spokesman for the Pakistani army retracted their original confession, and said that the attack was actually conducted by American forces, but that they were trying to suppress already brewing anger against the Americans by taking responsibility for it. So here we have it, 100 children killed, and the army (in this exceptional case) ADMITTED it lied.
Now why would I mention these two case studies? How is it relevant to whats going on in Pakistan? So you would understand whats at play here.
So you can fall under into the hole of deceptive journalism, and base your beliefs on relative premises while ignoring the bigger picture at hand.
I was in pakistan in 2001, 2003, 2005, these things were uncommon. But lo and behold, ever since America entered our soil, we see more of it? I wonder why?
This wasn't apparent in Iraq either, but someone created an amazing breeding ground for it, lo and behold, who was it again?
May Allah guide us all.