There is often a big hooplah made here that arranged marriages are not always successful, even if they don’t end up in divorce. The argument put forward is that the marriage may have turned sour and the couple are just sticking together for the sake of kids/family/reputation etc. Its not a bad argument, I will grant you that. Makes sense and is reasonable.
However what is to say that this is not the case with other kinds of marriages too?
And more over, what is an objective criteria to judge when is a marriage successful or not?
Most of us use a few anecdotal examples around us and try to extrapolate it to the whole population, and in their minds score a point. Is that even reasonable? How can we possibly quantify whether people are happy/sad in their marriages?
At the same time, the rate of divorce is often thrown about as a reference point to show how many marriages actually failed. Its objective, because when someone is divorced, its pretty clear things didn’t work out. But when that statistic is disputed by saying “ya ya ya.. but there are many marriages in Pakistan which don’t end up in divorce but the couple lives sadly ever after”, what does that prove?
Granted there are highs and lows in almost all relationships, how do we define what makes up a successful marriage?