Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

**too busy parsing bollywood movies? well its about time to wake yourself up into reality!


Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest - Sify.com

Capt. Bharat Verma **is the editor of Indian Defence Review. A quarterly journal read by leading policy makers at senior bureaucratic, political and military levels, the IDR is renowned as the “most-quoted Indian defence publication”. Capt. Verma is also the founder and current editor of Lancer Publishers, a publishing house dedicated to defence and security matters.

Indians pose the biggest threat to the Union of India.

The reason is simple. An average Indian is merely an individual. His personal well-being overrides all other considerations, including national interests.

This is perhaps why many have begun to propagate parting of Kashmir in their write-ups, since it does not belong individually to them. However, imagine the hue and cry if their personal property and family is held hostage by the terrorists. They will sing a different tune.

The blame lies with New Delhi. For the past 60 years, instead of consolidating the Union, leaders encouraged divisiveness on the basis of religion and caste for sheer vote bank politics. Instead of unifying its citizenry with good governance and increasing their stakes through prosperity, so that they may serve the cause of the nation with honor, it has treated its citizens with unprecedented shabbiness.

The result: groups of citizens have risen against the state, mostly for lack of economic progress and denial of justice. Such disgruntled groups are being taken advantage of by the external forces inimical to India.

There can never be unity in diversity. Unity requires a fair amount of uniformity in laws throughout the Union.

That New Delhi is its own worst enemy became obvious when it permitted the creation of a pure Islamic State on its borders. This nation-state contradicts every democratic and multi-cultural value dear to India. Therefore, if New Delhi has not slept a wink since the creation of Pakistan, it has no one except itself to blame!

Islamabad, besides the wars it imposed on New Delhi, extended its so-called Islamic purity to the Kashmir Valley by instigating the locals to carry out ethnic cleansing of the minority communities.

Hence, first we created a state with inbuilt characteristic of fundamentalism and extreme philosophy contrary to our professed beliefs; then the monster in it started ethnic cleansing in the Valley; and engineered demographic changes through Bangladesh in West Bengal, Assam and the Northeast.

Saudi Arabia and other Islamic oil-rich countries pitched in with the petro-dollars in support, all in the cause of the illusion called Ummah and the establishment of the Caliphate.

The Indian leadership, for its personal vote-bank gains, helped these inimical forces by invoking the Illegal Migrants (determination by Tribunals) or IMDT Act in Assam, which was subsequently shot down by the Supreme Court. The damage was done, as the Union’s overburdened security forces grapple with 15 million illegal Bangladesh infiltrators creating mayhem on Indian soil.

Islamabad, Dhaka, and now Kathmandu, spurred on by Beijing, have united with the singular agenda: to unhook the Valley and the Northeast from the Indian Union.

In addition, they are instigating the Maoists, who control almost 40 n per cent of the Union’s territory, to set up a parallel government, and ultimately, like the Maoists in Nepal, win the elections in pockets of their influence, and impose a regressive authoritarian governments in tune with their own regime.

And yet, New Delhi, instead of consolidating and unifying the Union , continues to divide its citizenry in religious or caste denominations.

Over the past 60 years, New Delhi’s muddle-headed policies actually encouraged separatism. Instead of ensuring diffusion of secular pan-Indian culture and the integration of the society by encouraging Indians from all over to buy and develop land and industry in the Valley and the Northeast, it imposed restrictions on such settlements.

Meanwhile, Pakistan and Bangladesh exported their fundamentalist population to these areas to change the demographic hues in their favour. The ugly separatist face of the agitation in the Valley today is the consequence of the dereliction of the fundamental duty by the Union.

The trend needs to be reversed forcibly by integrating the Valley firmly into the Indian mainstream by creating a secular mix of population through industrialisation.

Many conveniently propose the myth that a stable Pakistan is in India’s favour. This is a false proposition. The truth is that Pakistan is bad news for the Indian Union since 1947–stable or otherwise.

Islamabad has enjoyed brief periods of political stability since the birth of Pakistan. But even during these interludes, it continued to export terrorism, fake currency and narcotics to India. It continued its attempts to change the demography along our borders, and cultivated sleeper cells and armed groups inside our territory to create an uprising at an appropriate time.

Also, it aligned with Beijing and other powers, in a mutually beneficial scheme, to tie-down and ultimately cause a territorial split of the Union.

**With Pakistan on the brink of collapse due to massive internal as well as international contradictions, it is matter of time before it ceases to exist.
Multiple benefits will accrue to the Union of India on such demise. **

If Indian national interests are defined with clarity and prioritised, the foremost threat to the Union (and for centuries before its birth) has consistently and continuously materialised on the western periphery.

To defend this key threat to the Union, New Delhi should extend its influence through export of both soft and hard power towards Central Asia, from where invasions have been mounted over centuries. The cessation of Pakistan as a state facilitates furtherance of this pivotal national objective.

The destructive path that Islamabad chose will either splinter the state into many parts or it will wither away—a case of natural progression to its logical conclusion. In either case Baluchistan will achieve independence.

For New Delhi this opens a window of opportunity to ensure that the Gwadar port does not fall into the hands of the Chinese. In this, there is synergy between the political objectives of the Americans and the Indians. Our existing goodwill in Baluchistan requires intelligent leveraging.

Sindh and most of the non-Punjabi areas of Pakistan will be our new friends.

Pakistan’s breakup will be a major setback to the Jihad Factory, which functions with the help of its army and the ISI. This in turn will ease pressures on India and the international community.

With China’s one arm, i.e. Pakistan disabled, its expansionist plans will receive a severe jolt. Beijing continues to pose another primary threat to New Delhi. Even as we continue to engage with it as constructively as possible, we must strive to remove the proxy.

**At the same time, it is prudent to extend moral support to the people of Tibet to sink Chinese expansionism in the morass of insurgency. For a change, let us do to them what they do to us. **

With Pakistan gone, the chances of Central Asia getting infected with the Jihadi fervour will recede. Afghanistan will gain fair amount of stability. India’s access to Central Asian energy routes will open up.

With disintegration of ISI’s inimical activities of infiltration and pushing of fake currency into India, from Nepal and Bangladesh will cease. Within the Union social harmony will improve enormously. Export of Islamic fundamentalism, with its 360-degree sweep from Islamabad, will vanish. Even a country like Thailand will heave a sigh of relief.

Above all, the gathering threat from a united group of authoritarian regimes along our 14,000 km borders, orchestrated and synchronised by Pakistan, will dissolve.

**At the height of the recent disturbances in the Valley, when a general asked me for a suggestion to resolve the issue, I said: “ Remove Pakistan. The threat will disappear permanently.” Today the collapse of Pakistan as a state is almost certain. All the King’s men cannot save it from itself. **

Looking ahead, New Delhi should formulate an appropriate strategy for ‘post-Pakistan scenario’ to secure India’s interests in Central Asia.

It is intriguing, therefore, to hear New Delhi mouthing the falsehood that stable Pakistan is in India’s favour. Perpetuation of such illogic for vote-bank politics is harming the consolidation and integration of the Union.

Short-sighted politicians as usual are overlooking the national interest for the short-term personal gains of a few votes.

The writer is Editor, Indian Defence Review

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

Verma is probably living in the old world still, the world before Pakistan conducted nuclear tests. India started looking for a more stable Pakistan that day onwards. It was more obvious after 9-11, that chaos in Pakistan means jihadis might get their hands on "all things nuclear". India (and US) decided to help Pakistan stablize economically and politically. India's top priority is, how to handle the dallar influx (while it lasts) and stay away from war and troubled neighbours.

India might have sought a stable Pakistan back then, but 9/11 was a lottery for India for it gave India a freehand in maligning Pakistan internationally, a small bomb was shown with a magnifying glass, a pothole shown as crater, using Baluchistan to destabilize governance, using Afghan's Northern Alliance to their needs. With western countries, Israel "worried about Pakistan's nukes" India only adds more weight to the "worrying" community. Once Pakistan is destabilized enough (God forbid) to a point where whole world will demand "UN take control of Pak nukes" that day India will leave million balloons in air and party all over the country.

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

I agree with the author o fthis article in many ways but would alter the statement as follows:

"Until Pakistan ceases to be our enemy, Pakistan should remain as unstable as possible - but India and other nations should do their level best to change Pakistan from being an enemy to a regional partner; this would mean Pakistan should stop meddling with Kashmir and India should then promote better trade and economic progress with Pakistan; India needs peace in the border which only Pakistan can give and Pakistan needs regional economics that only India can give".

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

^^ so it is India who supports terrorism in Pakistan.

So why they cry when they get tit for tat? or this is just a habit of banya.

India and Pakistan are like old time Rajas (rulers of princely states) who were constantly at state of war with each other. Poor things never realized that the demise of one would ultimately doom the other.

Having said that, Indian animosity against Pakistan has some class when we compare that to the animosity of AlQaida against Pakistan.

Indians will support BLA, they may give money to MQM, or RAW may plant a bomb on a railway track.

However India will not stoop down to the committing suicide attack on Marriot. There are many reasons for Indian methods against Pakistan.

  1. India wants nay dreams to be in good books of Goras and international media.
  2. Indian military is ruled by the decedents of British-Indian military, that happens to be the same place Pakistani-Army comes from. Both Indian and Pakistani generals share the same ethnicity.
  3. Indian plans against Pakistan are based in statecraft, and international diplomatic games.
  4. Both India and Pakistan have respected and followed the international border (the problems have only been across LOC).

There are so many examples from the past and the present that show a bit (nay a lot) of chivalry between Indians and Pakistanis.

Back in 1965, Indian General wanted to conquer Lahore, but what was his next step?

He wanted to have a cup of tea in Lahore's country club (Gymkhana). The same feeling has existed in Pakistani army too. They may hate Indian government but they cherish Indian-controlled land because they have roots in the same land.

In peace time, border troops on both sides share the same pulao (pilaf), and the same curry.

Can you imagine the feelings in Pakistani or Indian army when they look across the beautiful valleys of Kashmir, or fertile lands of Punjab, or serene deserts across Khokhrapar?

These are the lands where both the armies have the sacred burial grounds that still hold the remains of their ancestors. And that's why my friends Pakistani and Indian airplanes take their bombs back instead of targeting civilian population.

Our problems with terror are due to the international Jihadi network. This network has no link to the lands of Kashmir, or Punjab, or Sindh. They don't care about their legacy that is linked to the land of Indus river or the river Ganges.

Unlike Indians, our enemy primitive-tribals do not respect the international border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

So anyone who wants to prove that Marriot blast was done by RAW are utterly mistaken (at the least), or they simply are the terror-supporters.

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

lol...who cares about India and its interests...especially on this forum...

I dont know by what stretch of imagination you call Indian and Pakistani generals of being from same ethnicity … maybe you can clarify what ethnicity means.

Now i can understand the " cup of tea" story in Pakistan forums as they have been fed these lies about " Indian attacks" for a long time …

But it is time people in Pakistan shoudl look beyond the rhetoric and understand and know how the army has been manipulating the country to stay in power … going back to 1965 war … here is something which was talked about recently by a retired air marshal in Pakistan … now corelate this to what is known in your history books and what is said about 65 war …

Nur Khan reminisces ’65 war -DAWN - National; September 6, 2005

Under his searching questions Gen Musa wilted and with a sheepish smile admitted that something was afoot. Nur Khan’s immediate reaction was that this would mean war. But, Gen Musa said you need not to worry as according to him Indians would not retaliate. Then he directed a still highly skeptical Nur Khan to Lt-Gen Akhtar Hasan Malik, GOC Kashmir, the man in-charge of “Operation Gibraltar” for further details. The long and short of his discussion with Gen Malik was, “don’t worry, because the plan to send in some 800,000 infiltrators inside the occupied territory to throw out the Indian troops with the help of the local population”, was so designed that the Indians would not be able retaliate and therefore the airforce need not get into war-time mode.

This was in July 1965 … war started in September 1965 !!!

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

But a Stable Pakistan is in Pakistan's interest. So we need to stop all this sillyness that revolves around he said, she said. When it comes down to it, Who really cares what India or any other nation thinks Pakistan's future ought to be. Pakistan has to determine its own future.

First get our own house in order, then we can preach to others. When a wrong is found, then it should be taken up bluntly. Example: When evidence is found that India is working to destabilize Pakistan, then Pakistan has to shout about it and let the world know instead of murmuring about it under the breath.

It's real simple: Either put up, or shut up!

I hope Pakistani politicians pay heed to all the corrosion that surrounds us and work on fixing it.

Short answers to your long questions.

  1. Both Indian and Pakistani armies draw their command from Punjabi and Pashtoon origions. This area has been the supplier of troops from time immemorial. Both Muslims and non-Muslim dynasties would draw their armies from this area. And both Muslims and non-Muslim Punjabis and Pashtoons (mostly non-FATA) have been the serving in the armies for 1000’s of years.

  2. 1965 war was started by Pak army in Kashmir. There is no doubt about it. Their calculations were wrong about India not crossing international borders. There is no conspiracy theory. It is a known fact. I won’t go into details as this is not the main topic.

well i guess you are sleeping or too busy enjoying pornobollywood..

buddy india is already planed this and now they are starting to execute this move!! when are you gonna wake up when pakistan is broken into pieces??

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

For people who support above article can simply swap India with Pakistan and result will be still valid. ("Stable India not in pakistan's interest")

I think otherwise. If India-Pakistan region was ever stable, there was no need for China or US to poke in between our matter. Nor would US army bomb Pakistan in name of taliban.

I agree with burqaposhx comments on formation of india-pakistan army. Still today army barracks are formed outside of city and army/navy/airforce people and their family consider themselves elite. They were the people in early 50-60's to dance in tune of western music, go to pub or disco's (i.e. follow bristich/western culture)

I also agree to the point that other than kashmir's LOC both nation never tried to absorb each one's area across international border. it's the fact no one can deny.

Imagine a stable sub-continental area where india and pakistan both peaceful nation sporting economic growth and progress without fear of bombing and terrorists attacks...

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

^ Siddhant, I agree... It would be a very powreful bloc indeed, but sadly we have to go a long way if anything of that sort is to become a reality.

You have a valid point but it depends on how stable India is. I don't find India leadership and agencies very stable mentally. There is too much hate for Pakistan in India and that is what driving them to these silly ideas. In the end their objective is the some how US can disarm Pakistan and then they can do what they want to. A mighty silly notion!

Re: Stable Pakistan not in India’s interest!

that powerdul bloc is an unlikely to be formed as bush turning muslim.