Spock/Data's hypocrisy

GS Services GS News & Support
1

LOL, this is too funny. Just yesterday he was badmouthing punjab police as being “torturers” and what not and now I say the same thing about them, I am given an infraction for “bad language”.

2

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Firstly, where is the proof? Secondly, how conveniently you are equating 'burning and shooting' innocent alive people to 'torturing'. Lastly, referring to Pakistan Army in such a derogatory way is strictly prohibited as per PA rules. That is all.

P.S. as much as you tried to manipulate things, you were given a warning for 'inappropriate language' and not 'bad language', as you are putting it.

3

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Stating fact becomes derogatory now? Would you like a history lesson or two? Tell me what inappropriate language did I use as you claim?

4

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Implicating that 'Punjab Police, Punjab Rangers, and Pakistan Army' are the sources to learn how to shoot and burn innocent people alive, in my opinion is worthy of infraction points. The moderator's action was justified in this instance, but i will let the Channel Manager comment and conclude.

Please remain patient, and your query will be addressed shortly.

5

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

oi i better go out of this room

Pictionary Game Sign Up
Pictionary Game Sign Up
6

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Why are the punjab army, rangers and pakistan army off limits but major political parties like mqm not off limits to criticize on such accounts? At least in the case of pakistan army, we have well documented historical proof to go by.

In other words, what level of accusation is ok: is calling punjab police torturers or pakistan army torturers ok, but calling them killers is not?

7

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

All political parties are open to scrutiny. Institutions are not limited to one province or part of the country, but rather represent the institution as a while, an asset of the nation. Ethnic or divisive language is not appreciated, and shows lack of substance during any debate.

Please remain patient, all relevant discussions are being reviewed, and your query will be answered in a timely manner. Rest assured fairness will be served.

8

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

I remain patient. What should I call punjab police or any provincial insitituion from now on? Am I allowed to mention the province of punjab at all? Will Shabaz Sharif become the Chief Minister of North East Province of Pakistan?

9

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Thanks for your patience. :)

10

Pakistan army, rangers are country's institutions while political parties are just that 'political parties'. You are free to criticize anyone but not in derogatory fashion.

11

I'm stating historical acts, has that been banned? Why are unsubstantiated and unproven accusations allowed but not facts?

Any Other Dialog
12

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

one man's facts are another man's accusations Khek. perhaps the issue is not so much what you are saying but how you are saying it.

Gupshup Photography
13

Ok fair enough. So, just to be clear, it's ok to be derogatory towards political parties and individuals but not towards state institutions?

I just want to be sure lest I get banned for the 10th time.

For example I can say: nawaz leaguers are murderers
but I can not say: pakistan police are murderers.

Did I get it right?

Aamnay Samnay: Hakuna Matata
14

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

^ LOL. I think so!

15

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Who's Data?

16

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

Dude's.. don't you have something better to fight on? ...

17

Re: Spock/Data’s hypocrisy

Take a chill pill.. :chai:..

18

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

hmmmm

19

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

^
now i tell you that is not GOOD .i wonder kis ki shamat aai hai:@:

20

Re: Spock/Data's hypocrisy

I don't think I have ever seen so many complaints with mods before.