Special Court has approved Musharraf’s plea to include his accomplices in the crime. Mr Shaukat Aziz, Mr. Dogar and Mr. Zahid Ahmad are included but surprisingly NO military man is included. the government has been ordered to record their statements within 15 days or else the reference will be dissolved. Musharraf must be a happy man today as experts say this is an opportunity for the government to just get rid of this quagmire. Special court okays Musharraf’s request calling for abettors’ trial - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
special court partially accepts Musharraf’s plea
Special Court has approved Musharraf’s plea to include his accomplices in the crime. Mr Shaukat Aziz, Mr. Dogar and Mr. Zahid Ahmad are included but surprisingly NO military man is included. the government has been ordered to record their statements within 15 days or else the reference will be dissolved. Musharraf must be a happy man today as experts say this is an opportunity for the government to just get rid of this quagmire. Special court conditionally okays trial of Musharraf’s abettors - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
Well, I hope soon, someone or next government would start treason trial (using article 6) against Thug Nawaz and his thug brother Shahbaz, as both abetted Zia-ul-Haq rule Pakistan under Martial law (indirectly, Musharraf lawyer did made remark that .. either all get sued or none, and in all, those are also included who abetted Zia Martial law as Chief Minister of Punjab). Obviously, Kiyani and corrupt Iftikhar would get sued too, as traitor under article 6, abetting Musharraf Martial law.
Maybe some would start a case against Z A Bhutto that he should be declared traitor to set the record right, as he was abettor in martial law of Ayub Khan and also helped Sikandar Mirza illegal government.
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
is Hammaam meN sabhii nange haiN aur sabhii ek duusre ko tan DhaaNpne kii talqeen yaa mashware de rahe haiN...yeh sab is liye nahiiN ho rahaa k qaanoon kii Hukmaraanii ho bal k is liye ho rahaa hai k kaun kis kii kaise gardan naap deve aur kaun kaise qaanoonii girift se aazaad ho jaave!
yeh sab bandaroN kaa khel kood hai, kisii madaarii/jamhoore ke ishaare par.
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
Well, I hope soon, someone or next government would start treason trial (using article 6) against Thug Nawaz and his thug brother Shahbaz, as both abetted Zia-ul-Haq rule Pakistan under Martial law (indirectly, Musharraf lawyer did made remark that .. either all get sued or none, and in all, those are also included who abetted Zia Martial law as Chief Minister of Punjab). Obviously, Kiyani and corrupt Iftikhar would get sued too, as traitor under article 6, abetting Musharraf Martial law.
Maybe some would start a case against Z A Bhutto that he should be declared traitor to set the record right, as he was abettor in martial law of Ayub Khan and also helped Sikandar Mirza illegal government.
Bhai...yeh abetting keya hota hey. Koi Zara hum awam key level ki inglis winnglis mein bata dou. Meherbanni Saab
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
Bhai...yeh abetting keya hota hey. Koi Zara hum awam key level ki inglis winnglis mein bata dou. Meherbanni Saab
lo jii, gaii bhaiNs paanii meN...maiN ne to aap se angrejjii seekhne ka mansooba banaa rakkhaa thaa!...ab maiN kisse sekhuuNgaa? :D
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^^kyoun "Research and Analysis " valoun ney inglis sikhaa key nahi aapko project pey bhejtey houn gey.
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^^kyoun "Research and Analysis " valoun ney inglis sikhaa key nahi aapko project pey bhejtey houn gey.
bas kaam chalaaoo inglis aave hai mohe...jaise:
kisii ko kahnaa ho k** yahaN aao** to kahuuNgaa:
come here!
aur agar use phir vahiiN vaapas bhejnaa ho to maiN uskii pahli waali position par jaauuNgaa aur phir kahuuNgaa:
come here!
bas aise hii kaam chaltaa hai/guzaaraa hotaa hai! :p
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
Bhai...yeh abetting keya hota hey. Koi Zara hum awam key level ki inglis winnglis mein bata dou. Meherbanni Saab
Brother, I know that you do not just mean meaning of the word that can be found in dictionary, but I believe you would like to know what it means with reference to Pakistani constitution on High treason (article 6). So, here it is .:)
I would post in two parts so that one who feels dizzy reading long post can read the parts. :)
Part 1: Article 6 of Pakistani constitution
Part 2: What it means by aiders, abetters and collaborators. Who are these people?
Before posting, I should also mention (as it is necessary to know) that first Pakistani constitution was written and passed from assembly in 1956, and thus this constitutional clause applies to anyone who becomes guilty of this clause from 1956 onward.
It is obvious that this law can only get applied if there was military coup that ended, or after a military government ends. Since there is no time limit for a military government to end, nor there is time limit for this law to get applied, all who are guilty of violating this law since 1956 can be brought to justice anytime, even after their death. That is obvious too, as dictator and their aiders, abetters and collaborators could become hero and could be awarded with titles while dictator is ruling, and they may even die before this clause is applied on them (like Ayub Khan and Bhutto), but according to constitution they are traitors, and thus even after death, their title and hero status has to go, that means, law should apply to them, all their good name and titles snatched, and they should be declared traitor.
According to any justice system, courts could not apply any constitutional clause selectively. If they are applied, it has to get applied on all guilty of that clause, and that means, if this clause applied on one, it should be applied to all.
Actually, this was the argument that Musharraf lawyer took, and made the court to declare that this clause cannot be applied to Musharraf alone, but should be applied equally to aiders, abetters and collaborators.
Next step would be to ask court that, if it is applied to one incident, what about other incidents, and that means, article 6 should be applied on all who aided, abetted, and collaborated with Ayub, Yahya and Zia … at least on all who are alive (though all who are dead should be included too).
Part 1: Article 6 of Pakistani constitution: According to article 6, a person who abrogates, subverts, suspends, holds in abeyance, attempts or conspires to abrogates, subverts, suspends, hold in abeyance … by use or show of force or by any other unconstitutional means, shall be guilty of high treason … as well as those who aided, abetted or collaborated with the person above would be guilty of high treason, in same way as person mentioned above.
Thus, if there is military coup, not the chief or armed forces or army generals alone, but all who aided, abetted, and collaborated in military coup, are equally responsible and thus are guilty of high treason.
Article 6. High treason
6. High treason.—[SUP]1/SUP Any person who abrogates or subverts or suspends or holds in abeyance, or attempts or conspires to abrogate or subvert or suspend or hold in abeyance, the Constitution by use of force or show of force or by any other unconstitutional means shall be guilty of high treason.]
(2) Any person aiding or abetting [SUP]2[/SUP][or collaborating] *the acts mentioned in clause (1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.
*[SUP]3[/SUP](2A) An act of high treason mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) shall not be validated by any court including the Supreme Court and a High Court.]
(3) [SUP]4[/SUP][Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] shall by law provide for the punishment of persons found guilty of high treason.
Note: In above article, word collaborator and clause 2(A) is added in 2010 (18th amendment). Anyhow, this word and clause make no difference to earlier clause, as aiders and abetters includes those who are collaborators.
As for 2(A), what used to happen (validation by court and later parliament) in past, it was illegal anyhow, as there was no validation when a crime occurred, and thus it becomes established crime, so no later ruling can change the nature of that crime. It is just like a sex happened before marriage and becomes zina (illegal intercourse), than later nikah do not and cannot change that crime, expunge that crime, nor exonerate or absolve person guilty of zina from being zani. Anyhow, inclusion of this statement 2(A), stops any ambiguity for people who can think little.
Part 2: What it means by aiders, abetters and collaborators. Who are these people?
Aiders, abetters, collaborators: Are those people who approved, encouraged, supported, assisted, joined, gave advice, urged, helped … or became partner in whatever way.
That means if military takes over than whoever encouraged military rule by words of mouth, actions, or deeds are guilty of high treason. In other words, an individual, or a party that encouraged military takeover is guilty, an individual or party that helped running the country under military rule or joined the government of military ruler to govern are guilty, each and every Judge of high judiciary that helped from their verdict to facilitate military ruler are guilty, and so on.
It means, all judges who ever took oath on PCO, all national and provincial ministers during the time of military government (actually, whole cabinet when military rule was there), all army generals who were part of coup, all top bureaucracy and top police officers who helped a military dictator running the country smoothly, all political leaders who supported military ruler morally or in whatever way, and so on … are guilty of high treason.
And thus all who are guilty of violating article 6, should be taken to court to get punished of high treason ... and should be declared traitor ... that includes Z A Bhutto, Nawaz Shareef, Shahbaz Shareef, and so on.
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
Selective justice is worst form of injustice.
Musharraf should be put on trial for 1999 coup along with all the judges of that time who took oath on PCO (yes that includes Iftekhar chaudhry) and all the people who abetted him (yes that includes all corp commanders and politicians too)
and ultimately we should try Zia Ul Haq along with who ever supported him (yes that includes Nawaz and shahbaz) and Ayub Khan and whoever supported him (and yes that includes Zulfiqar Bhutto too)
then we can say justice is served else everything is just "nazariya-e-zaroorat" (doctrine of necessity)
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
So Dharna of IK and Qadri is producing results
Afghan-Indo Policy back to GHQ
MUSHY being provided safe exist
Now Sharifs can do whatever they want to do, just like after getting their things from Zardari... they let him complete his 5 years...
Keep Qadri and IK pumped up.. the moment NS try to go left right.. bring them back
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^^Why the government of NS is afraid of Mush? He should have been at least in jail what he did to elected PM in 1999?
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^ NS is afraid of the army, NOT Mushy! :)
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^ NS is afraid of the army, NOT Mushy! :)
Then after five years of rule, what Zardari did to PPP, NS will do the same disaster to PML(N). Zardari betrayed the voters and NS is following the same path of betrayal and lies to the people who voted him to corridor of power. Imran Khan will emerge as winner in the next elections. :)
Re: special court partially accepts Musharraf's plea
^ very true...!!!