look at the collapse …
1972 Sussex v Surrey…Last day Sussex 187/1 needing 205 for a win 3 overs remain…
Step up Mr Pat Pocock…Bowling 2 of the last 3 overs
Pat’s 1st of 2 overs went ww.w2. and
his last over the last of the day www1ww .
Sussex finished on 202/9 and match drawn…anyone know of similar collapses?
Re: Something Interesting ..
No I don't that is absolutely incredible. I suppose it shows that you should never give up, that's for sure.
Re: Something Interesting ..
Australia vs Pakistan
1979, Where Australia collapsed from 305/3 to All out 310. Sarfraz took 9/86.
He dismissed seven batsmen while conceding one run from 33 balls.
Ganja
April 10, 2006, 2:27pm
4
Re: Something Interesting ..
http://usa.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1999-2000/OD_TOURNEYS/CHT/SCORECARDS/PAK_SL_CHT_ODI3_15OCT1999.html
Pak vs SL in Sharjah, 1999
SL were 173-3 chasing a modest Pakistani total of 196. Abdul Razzaq took 5-31 and SL were all out 196, match was tied.
Re: Something Interesting ..
How about that test in NZ in 2003 when NZ collapsed at around 90 thanks to Shoaib Akhtar?
Re: Something Interesting ..
Pak vs India Under 19 WC Final. India was 9 for 6, thanks to Anwar Ali and Jamshed something. :D
razeeb
April 11, 2006, 5:07am
7
Re: Something Interesting ..
maihu_don:
look at the collapse …
1972 Sussex v Surrey…Last day Sussex 187/1 needing 205 for a win 3 overs remain…
Step up Mr Pat Pocock…Bowling 2 of the last 3 overs
Pat’s 1st of 2 overs went ww.w2. and
his last over the last of the day www1ww .
Sussex finished on 202/9 and match drawn…anyone know of similar collapses?
it would have been crazy had he gotten wicket on the last ball … still really facinating performance
Re: Something Interesting ..
^ he did get the wicket on the last ball....
that dot u see on the end is not a dot ball but a full-stop.... :p
Re: Something Interesting ..
it would have been crazy had he gotten wicket on the last ball ... still really facinating performance
well he did ... thats the full stop at the end :Dnot a dot ball, thats why its not adjacent to the "w" there ...