Re: Some unimportant questions -muharam related
Thanks for answering folks
Yar ye tu bari mushkil kisam ki bemari lagti hai after looking for it on web i reckon it is somekind of phsychological disorder… But i thought it would be some physical illness sort of like fever, malaria, typhoid type illness
Great question !
if you understand this you understand the ummmayyads esp the sufyanids
they were masters in the art of propoganda
yazid afterall was the son of muawiyah he was no hajjaj…and only difference between father and son was that muawiyah was politically savy and knew how to keep the different tribes and communities in place with intimidation,threats and bribery.Even the extrajudicial killings he did was of pious but politically insignificant opponents like hujr b adi (ra) and amr b hamiq khuzai(ra) etc]…
yazid was brought up in luxury and at times thought that brute force should prevail. That explains atrocities like Battles of Harra and Karbala.However he was careful not to present himself as the slaughterer of Prophet[pbuh]'s family that would be political suicide…why not leave the blame to his overzealous commanders who cared nothing for public image? let the ibn ziyads and shimars do his dirty work and take blame for it
afterall his father has used this excuse before succcessfully to coverup his crimes.
The immediate aftermath of karbala had potentially devastating consequences for the sufyanids with trouble stirring up in kufa, the perenial kharijite problem and ibn zubayr in hijaz] and yazid must have been aware of that atleast his advisors definately were.Nothing was to be gained now in killing a young son of hussain [as] in coldblood after karbala, hashimites were finished as a political force …now was the time to project himself as the kind and compassionate caliph that was why numan b bashir was sent to escort the family of the Prophet (pbuh) to medina [Keep in mind numan b bashir was a enemy to ameer-ul-mominnen Ali b abutalib only one of the few ansars who sided with muawiyah]
Thanks for the explaination It seems like lot of politics was involved
Marbles:
I think there’s a bit of confusion about Imam’s age at the time of the battle.
Imam Zainul Abideen’s year of birth is 38 AH which makes him roughly 23 at the time of Karbala. So he was an adult. Imam had a boy of 5, the fifth Imam, Muhammad Baqir.
Imam Zainul Abideen was severly ill at that time, so he couldn’t participate in the battle.
Allahu 'Aalam. . .
^ thats what i heard/ read. I dont know how much of it is authentic