Dr. Radhakrishnan, ex-President of India and an eminent interpreter of Hinduism, as quoted in India: An Introduction by Khushwant Singh, New Delhi, 1990.
[Hinduism is] “… a name without any content… Its content, if any, has altered from age to age, from community to community. It meant one thing in the Vedic period, another in the Brahmanical, a third in the Buddhist [1] - one to Saivite, another to Vaishnavite and Sakta.”
(Dr. Radhakrishnan was the second President of independent India).
Jawaharlal Nehru, The Discovery of India, New Delhi, 1983, p.75.
“Hinduism, as a faith, is vague, amorphous, many-sided, all things to all men. It is hardly possible to define it, or indeed to say definitely whether it is a religion or not, in the usual sense of the word. In its present form, and even in the past, it embraces many beliefs and practices, from the highest to the lowest, often opposed to or contradicting each other.”
(Pandit Nehru was the first Prime Minister of independent India during 1947-64).
TO WHAT HEIGHTS CAN I NOT RISE