Please cite the objective basis here. I see no reason to grant the idea that indian cricketers are for some reason more 'civilized' even though 'common indian' and 'common pakistani' hold the same views. Whatever class distinction you are groping for, it is ridiculously hand-wavey, especially in light of you using words like 'objective'.
Dont blame me for not parsing your comments in a marxist light, and it is natural to assume that cricketers hail from whatever 'common' indian/pakistani means. Can you substantiate your claim that indian cricketers as a group hail from a different class than 'common indians'?
you are seriously asking me for empirical evidence to substantiate claims of relative indian superiority in civility of cricketers? lol.
if a truly objective answer did exist, say the result of a well-designed poll of unbiased parties and peer-reviewed academic research on cricketer civility, and you had to bet all your material possessions on the outcome...would you bet on the answer being "indian cricketers" or "pakistani cricketers". please reply honestly.
i'm sure somebody could actually research player backgrounds and produce the evidence, but given that i don't have enough interest in this argument to actually do that....let's just use english language proficiency as a barometer of socioeconomic background. which team do you think would rank higher using this metric?