Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

i am double minded in this

i want that Pak force should come back and want american to fight with these mullahs
do no mareen gay and jahan pak ho ga

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

One the same token, those who condone military action against the militants should whole-heartedly support broader attack by the US on Pakistan to root out Al-Qaeda. I don’t think it gives much credence otherwise to their point-of-view; considering what a dimunitive job the Pakistani forces have done. Let the US come and take care of busines… :soldier:

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

Yeah, the fear of a nuclear fall out tends to keep the Americans at bay. Dont get me wrong....they'd love to bomb us to smitherenes but are just too late to bomb everyone. They'll just have to settle for a few bombs here and there in Waziristan.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

"Dimunitive"? Make a Sat Phone call to Jahannum and ask Mullah Gazi. He'll tell you all about diminutive job Pak army did to his "halwakhor tond" (aka bear belly) .

May be US should take care of terror-sympathizers in Canada as well!

Re: Should US attack Pakistan?

It's debatable how muslim taliban are, but ok. Have you see pictures of the pakistani army soldiers blown into pieces by taliban terrorists?

Re: Should US attack Pakistan?

I have not seen those pictures nor do I wish to.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

Of course they wont, and the importance of any BB, Mian, Fazl permission would be even more insignificant. I hope that's an equally obvious fact.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

But meheralone the thing is, the moment GI boots hit Pak soil, the terrorists will start hitting indiscriminately at everything all across the country, targeting markets, all western outlets, media, everything slightly westernized and so on...the terrorists don't want to face the opponent, they just hide and strike at the back. so their 'war' will come into the cities from the battlefields. because they aren't able to face force from the front, they hide and try to hit whatever they think is the source of force against them, and that will make them hit govt targets as well...

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

Typical disinformation spread by the JAMA (Jhootay Arabia Maulvi Association) News Service. Every socialist and Mullah wants to prove that USA is out to get Pakistan.

But JAMA news has no proof, no evidence, just Suni Sunai rumors.

USA and NATO soldiers have died facing Wazirastani and Bajorie militants. They could have easily sent in B-52 bombers and carpet bombed Wazirastan and Bajore. "But USA didn't carpet bomb Waziri or Bajori militants, not even used daisy cutters".

However the likes of this poster continue spreading lies, and feeding lies and untruths. No wonder JAMA is so pathetic.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

Why are you dodging my question. Aren't you being a hypocrite by not supporting the US attack against Pakistan, when clearly all efforts are anything but irresolute and undependable. Don't ignore the spanking the Pakistani army got soon after the Lal Masjid operation. The great US is manifolds more capable then coming in taking care of the job Paki forces are just incompetent to do. They got other priorities to take care of such as fleecing prime properties, and setting themselves with novel posts upon retirement. Not to mention kick-backs & commissions in arms deals.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

They routinely use 1000 lbs bombs - good enough to get the job done. Now, who's the biggest and blatant liar who only knows eschewing facts.. :D

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

There has been no carpet bombing of FATA yet.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

this will not happen , in my opinion
what i had talk to my friends in security agencies, according to them , mullah their getting money from RAW , barinwashing the teenagers in name of islam and basharat of janna etc etc then sending them with pin point targets told to them by the RAW agents

aghanistan is not allowing us to fence the border , although if terrorist are going from Pakistan to aghanistan , it will be helpful for them but they always start shouting against this, one can question

india is very very strong in kandahar , every one knows and how indian agents work their , every one knows

american knows that keeping this point of view , what you told , pak army would not allow americans to cross the boarder, they are keep on increasing pressure

what i am thinking , if we allow americans to come, and fence the boarder of FATA etc and don't allow any one to come here after attack without proper check

the brain washed people will focus towards americans , and then it will not possible for indian agents mullahs to disturb Pakistan and then it will be very easy to cought or shoot them easily

but i am not sure Pak will do this

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

plz don't allow the americans to do carpet bombing or use air force , rather force americans to sent their ground forces , and don't do innocent killing

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

mullahs should fear allah now. They are getting motivated and receiving money from a predominantly pagan organization.

and also america and indian army in kashmir must be so angry with this move by RAW :omg:

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

The Pakistani government picks up the worst moments to flex its muscles in efforts to keep its integrity. Its quite evident that we can clearly use the superior fire power of US or NATO but our constant denial is quite mind-boggling. In so many instances prior to this, the government folded like a cheap suit when faced with international demands but in this case, where external support will be to our benefit, the government is bent on going solo.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

This is spot on. While it is true that 'stray' US/NATO bombs or bullets have hit FATA, any ground invasion will mean further radicalization of the population. Suicide bombing in cities, military personnel and installations being targeted.

So many Pakistani people are misguided in thinking that the US will do anything positive by entering in Pakistan.

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

hahaha i love you man.. you are the funniest guy on here no doubt..

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

This is why I said wahabis “claim” to “follow” imam hanbli if the push comes to shove but many of them don’t believe in any imam saying quran and sunnah? * is enough and they don’t need to follow “dead people” :mudhosh:

Try to learn to read next time.. ;)*

Re: Should US attack militants in Pakistan?

That is why Pakistan army needs to kill the terrorists first.