Re: Should Iran be attacked?
whatever happened to Israelis? you already dumped them? tsk tsk :nono:
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
Dopi said Iran has tummy ache due to Bush.
He got a reply that Mullahs have been consuming Nukie halwa for the last 15+ years. So how could you blame Bush Jr. for it.
Now we get an Iranian Prince who says Dopi has a point. Well if that rings your bell, then be happy with it. But you still will need Dopi to defend Iranian-Mullahs in Gitmo.
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
If Iran is attacked...Pakistan is next in line.
They already have forces in neighbouring countries like Afghnistan and Iraq. So after having them in Iran as well, how difficult it would be to bomb Pakistan God forbid.
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
Well that may be true if Pakistan is being ruled by AhmadNejad's Mllahtic cousin Maulana Qazi.
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
I think Saudia or middle eastern countries are not as much stronghold for muslims in the world as compared to Iran. If Iran get attacked, that would be it for all Muslim countries in the World. A slap on the face....
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
My question, is whole muslim world gonna sit and watch Iran get attacked as well? like we did for Iraq? Obvioulsy, we are not going to hear anything from coward arabs.... should Pakistan fully get involved to take Iran's side?
We know Afghanistan was just a start of string...
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
People talking about Muslim world vs. non-Muslim world are living in a "fanatics world" of about 600 years ago.
Today Malaysia is getting ready to send their astronaut to the Space Station, while Iranian Mullahs are getting ready to send their nation to the "toilet station".
See it really depends where you want to go: Space or toilet.
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
Today Malaysia is getting ready to send their astronaut to the Space Station, while Iranian Mullahs are getting ready to send their nation to the "toilet station".
See it really depends where you want to go: Space or toilet.
O ya I beleive Iran is also very much ahead in lot of things but does that mean it can't have nuclear power?
Today Malaysia might be well ahead in sceinces but there is no way they can save their ass when it comes to an open war.
It might look like Mullahs are doing dumb stuff but reality is, it is about power. United states has the power of science and nuclear both and they are capable of taking over any country they want to. SO should any other country not have the same ability? Why just stick to sending astronotes to moon.
Iraq was not attacked becuz they were yellling the sologan of Jihad and muslim world blah blah...they were attacked for very specific reasons which we all know what.
Re: Should Iran be attacked?
*The difference with any action against Iran is stark: hard evidence of genuine WMD in preparation; hard, stated evidence of intent. And a clearly defined, containable and comparatively attainable military objective — knocking out that enrichment site at Natanz. *
Why not attack North Korea? The only reason Bush and Co. wants or will invade Iran is for Oil, just like it was for Iraq. All these 'reasons' are BS and media propaganda. The only change in Iraq right now is over100,000 people dead and counting.