The Nasibi website you have referred to are managed by some kids who usually copy paste stuff from old anti-Shia websites and much if ots filth has been refuted at:
Answering-Ansar.org :: Home
From your own trusted respected sources
- Ali bin Abi Talib [as] deemed Abu Bakar as** ‘a liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest’.** [Sahih Myslim]
- Faimta Zahra [as] died angry of your first hero [Sahih Bukhari]
- Ali bin Abi Talib [as] did not like Umar to visit his house [Sahih Bukhari]
etc
The references you are relying on also says that Ali bin Abi Talib [as] asked Abu Bakar that Umar should not visit his hosue as he did not like Umar’s presence, do you also accept that? The tradition also says that Ali bin Abi Talib [as] did not give bayah to Abu Bakar for whole Six months, do you have any good reason for that? Ali bin Abi Talib [as] did not allow Abu Bakar etc to attend the funeral prayers of the daughter of Holy Prophet [s], any good reason? This all is suffice to cut down your story which paint that “all is well”.
Since you people are narrow-minded and devoid of wisdom thus you only see things in a smaller picture. Ali bin Abi Talib [as] was Imam of the time, what he did was not for his support for Abu Bakar - the one who snatched the right of Ahlulbayt [as] but for the benefit of mankind. Yusuf [as] was representative of Allah on earth in his era, yet he not only guided but personally worked under a Kaafir king just because of the betterment of the human beings at large.
I have already informed you abotu a website i.e. Answering-Ansar.org :: Home that has unveiled the rubbish copy-paste act done by your beloved Nasibi website.
The only particular instance wherein Taqiyah is allowed in Islam is when one is forced to say or act something contrary to Islam, thats how it is.
The one who had audacity to hate or even fight Ali bin Abi Talib [as] is himself/herself hated by Allah [swt] and his Prophet [s], why to single out the Shias in it?
Quote me one which shows that Shias attribue the crime of adultery on Ayesha? This is what you had initially assreted.
That is the result of years of work coming out of Nasibi Madrassas teaching stupid and rubbish things to their followers abut Shias, but the stupid are those who blindly accept these baseless things without even asking their Mullah to substantiate their claims.
.
Of course there are differences, who said there isnt any??? yes there are differences that cannot be ignored.
That shows your narrow-mindedness, typical mentality influnced by Nasibi madrasas. Unity does not require having identical beliefs from both sides, if they were identical in the first palce, why to talk about unity then? The calls for the requirement of unity itself shows that it is being referred to about two sects having ‘different’ beliefs.
The main and the compulsory part of the Kalima is same i.e.
“La Ilaha Illalah Muhammad un Rasool Allah”. If you are to object on the later part of the Shia Kalima which is recited as Mustahib act, then I have full right to object on your six Kalimas as well.
Also shias differ from sunnies in other fundementals of:
And for each of these, Shias can prove their stance from authentic Sunni soruces. But since you have been giving priority to anti-Shia literature all this long, therefore you never bothered to see what is written in your own books. And yes, if incorrect Wuzu invalidates prayer then show me the word “wash” in Quran while you “wash” the feet during Wuzu, so whose Wuzu is incorrect?
The biggest thing about the three caliphs is that they hurt Ahlulbayt [as].
You lick the feet of the all time enemies of Ahlulbayt [as], deem people like Muawiyah and Yazeed respected, those who were involved in cursing and killing Ahulbayt [as], how Shias would feel, have you ever paid heed to that? The notrorious enemies and killers of imam Hussian [as] such as Shimer, Umar Ibn Saad, Muhammad bin al-Ashath, Rabi, Ibn Ziyad etc have been deemed as authentic narrators of Sunni Hadith books, have you ever bothered to know the Shia sentiments on that? If besides all this junk in your backyard, we are willing to show unity, for the interest of Ummah, then whats the fuss is all about?
FATWA MY FOOOT. Mullahs of your past like Qazi Shureh did not spare Imam Hussain [as] from stupid fatwas, then what to expect from your new generation? And anyone triyng to issue fata against us, first has to prvoe his own Imaan, otherwise it will be like any Hindu/Christian passing fatwa on Shias.
Yeah wow, what a briiliant way to respect Ali bin Abi Talib [as] and other members of Ahlulbayt [as] while at the same time also loving those who cursed, abused and faught them. So please cut the crap. Its lke somone saying “I love both, Ibrahim and Nimrod”. Either take this side or that one, no need to sail in two boats at a time.
But we we do not want nor are encouraged to have unity in such disrespectful and untrushworthy people.
The Wahabis/ Salafies have themsevles been declared Kaafirs by other Sunni schools such as Brelvies. So you better first solve your own problems.
No Shia is begging for unity, its some elements from both schools who think that for the betterment of Ummah as a whole, both schools shall come together by not rasing controversial issues.
Yeah it require guts, moreover some moral groud to debate, so you better lay off.