SHIA BELIEFS

[BOY-NICE]

@ALIJAN1001

offtopic this thrad is belows to shia beliefs not differences between sunni imams.

That is not off topic at all and what I have posted was not just ‘differences between Sunni Imams’ but was their total onslaught on their fellow Sunis just like they have done for Shias, so if you are not a hypocrtie and do not indulge in double standards, you have to accept what they have said about other people too.

producing below more ulmas fatwas against shia religion.

Since you are adamant to continue copy pasting the Fatwas of Sunni Imams against Shias, I would also like to keep reminding you their Takfeer made against eachother.

1. Imam Ash-Shafi’i: On one occasion Imam Shafi’i said concerning the Shia,
   “I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi* Shia.” and on another occasion he said; “Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the raafidi* Shia, because they invent ahadith and adopt them as part of their religion.” (Minhaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah) *
   (Some shia at the time of the Alid Imam Zayd ibn 'Ali demanded that he make a declaration of innocence (tabarra) from whoever disagreed with 'Ali’s right to be Imam. When Zayd refused, they rejected him, and became known as the “raafida” or rejectors. Those who followed Imam Zayd became known as Zaydis, and have very little difference from mainstream Islam. The Raafidi evolved into the the various Imami shia sects, the largest of which is the Ithna 'Ashari.)

Shafiyee said: ‘I don’t know anyone who wrote a book proving his errors except Abu Hanifa’
Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 567

In another Sahih tradition that we read in Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 549:

[RIGHT]وقال الشافعي شر عليهم من أبي حنيفة[/RIGHT]

Shafiyee said: ‘No one was born in Islam more evil than Abu Hanifa’

Now let us read the belief of Shafiyee scholar Muhammad bin Muhammad Abu Mansur al-Faqih al-Barawi al-Tusi (d. 576 H) in Shazarat al-Dahab, Volume 4 page 271:

It has been reported that al-Barawi said: ‘If I was the authority I would take Jaziya from the Hanbalis’

Jaziya is a tax that is imposed on non-Muslims.

2. Imam Abu Hanifah: It is reported that often Imam Abu Hanifah used to repeat the following statement about the raafidi Shia; “Whoever doubts whether they are disbelievers has himself committed disbelief.”

The followers of Hanafi sect i.e. Brelvis and Deobandies have been issuing Takfeer against eachother as well:

Ex Leader of the Nasibi terorrist orgnization of the Subcontinent Sipah Sahaba [kr-hcy.com], Zia ur Rahman Faruqi in his support of the banning of Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi’s Tafseer of the Quran in Saudi Arabia, stated:

“We have come to know that some people of this evil [Dhaala] sect via a letter to you have sought to revoke the ban on the said Tafseer and translation [of Quran], and have very cunningly made an venomous attempt to cover up the wrong beliefs of their founder…The said Tafseer and translation [of Quran] is the result of the pen by the founder Ahmed Raza Khan Brelvi and his caliph Mufti Naeemuddin Muradabadi of this evil [Dhaala] sect. It is our demand that not only Kanz ul Iman be banned in Saudi Arabia but in other Arabic world, moreover the followers of ‘Raza Khani’ sect should be strictly prohibited from performing the rites of Hajj”.
Kanz al Iman par pabandee kyo? [Why a ban on Kanz ul Iman?] pages 3-4 printed Ish’aat ul Maarif, Faislabad

Imam Ahmad Raza Khan stated:

“The worse Murtad [apostate] amongst all is a Munafiq [hypocrite]. He is the one whose company is more harmful than the company of thousdand Kafirs because such a person teachs Kufr while being a Muslim, specially Wahabia Deobandia, as they call themsevles as pure Ahlul Sunnah, try to be Hanafi, Chishti Naqshbandi, offer prayers and keep fasts similar to our’s, learn and teach our books and call names upon Allah and Prophet [s], they are the most lethal ones”
Ahkaam e Shariat, part 1 page 77, Abulaala Press, Agra, India

Similarly we read:

“Deobandis and others, their prayer [Salat] is no prayer [Salat] and to pray behind them is also no prayer [Salat]. If for example the Imam of Friday prayer [Juma] or of the two Eid is amongst them [Deobandis etc] and you are unable to find a Muslim Imam, then it is obligatory [Fardh] to abandon the Friday and Eid prayers, one should just perform Zuhar instead of Friday prayer”.
1. Ahkaam e Shariat, part 1 page 77
*2. Fatawa Rizvia, Volume 1 page 191 and page 736 (published in Breli) *

5. Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi: During the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imam Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm would often debate with the Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of the original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out the Shia claims that the Qur’an has been distorted and altered, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shia claims were not valid evidence because the shia were not themselves muslims.

He was himself a Nasibi scholar, then you can hardly expect him to say something good about the followers of Ali bin Abi Talib [as]. Like his Banu Ummayya’s Nasibi Khalifas, Ibn Hazm toed the same anti Ali line and to prove this we quote Dhahabi who stated in Siyar alam al-Nubala, Volume 18 page 201:

“What increased his status was his inclination towards the rulers of Bani Ummaya, the past and the present of them and his belief of the correctness of their Imamate, till he was attributed to Nasb”

8. Dr. Hilali: After living close to the shia for some years, the famous Moroccan scholar, Dr. Hilali wrote a paper on them in which he declared them to be disbelievers.

9. among the other contemporary scholars who have expressed similar views are: Sheikh Abdul 'Aziz ibn Baz, Sheikh Nassiraddin Al-Albani, Allama Ash-Shanqiti, Sheikh An-Nashashibi, Imam Ahmad Ameen, and Dr. Rashaad Salim.

The common link between the above cited names of scholars is the fact that they are adherents of the Salafi / Wahabi / AhleHadeeth cult who unlike ‘true’ Sunnis reject Tawassul, performing ziarat to Rasulullah’s grave etc. The key link to these Nawasib is the fact that they deem their Imam to be Ibn Tamiyah, they deem him to be “Shaykh ul Islam” and their Nasibi thought is in line with his views. Now let us analyse what the Ahl’ul Sunnah have said about their Imam.

We read in Daf Shubah min Shabah by Abu Bakr bin Muhammad al-Hesni al-Dimashqi al-Shafiyee (d. 829 H), page 123:

“Sheikh Zainuddin ibn Rajab al-Hanbali was amongst those who believed that Ibn Taimiyah is a kafir”

Abu al-Mahasin al-Dimashqi in his book Zayl Tazkirah tul Hufaz, page 316 and Shaykh Ahmed Raza Bijnawri in Anwar al-Bari, Volume 11 page 192 have recorded another statement of Shaykh Alauddin Bukhari al-Hanafi (d. 841 H) regarding Ibn Tamiyah that:

**“He (Alauddin Bukhari) declared in his assembly that whoever deems Ibn Taymia to be ‘Sheikh ul Islam’ is kafir”. **

We read in Takmilat al-Sayf al-Saqil by Imam Muhammad Zahid bin Hassan al-Kawthari al-Hanafi (d. 1371 H), page 177:

**“The Syrian (scholars) issued a statement about ibn Taimiyah, and al-Burhan ibn al-Ferkah wrote on it forty lines wherein he declared that he (ibn Taimiyah) is a kafir, and al-Shehab bin Jabhal agreed with him” **