Re: Shia And Sunni Muslims
So have I, I have also provided references from your own sources, and also can give you direct links from online Sunni Libraries or scan pages (of those which I have) unlike you who just write references in his own words thats it.
Since speeking without home work is your habbit I challenge you to show me the page of answering-ansar, from where you claim that I have pasted it?
Wah wah wah ! When you cite Shia scholars, then such ‘excuses’ doesnt come into your minds, but when I reveal the pathetic beliefs of your school, all the beliefs of ‘mistakes’ comes into your mind. Munafiqat at its worst! By the way, I can show you references of tahreef from Saha Satta also, the books that are considered most authentic after Quran in Sunni school, and you will not be albe to bring the ‘mistake’ excuse there.
Ok, it seems that ytou are so proud of Bukhari, now lets talk about some of those tahreef from the 2513 traditions, which you are proud of.
**Sahabi Ibn Masud rejected two Surahs from Quran, he believed that Tahreef had been done by adding them into Quran **
We are quoting from the following esteemed work of Ahle Sunnah.
- Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 6 Hadith 501
- Fatah al Bari, Volume 8 page 743, kitab al tafseer
- Tafseer Dur al Manthur, Volume 6 page 416
- Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Volume 4 page 571
- Tafseer Qurtubi, Volume 2 page 251
- Tafseer Ruh al Mani, Volume1 page 279
- Sharah Mawafiq, page 679
Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 6 Hadith 501
**Narrated Zirr bin Hubaish: **
I asked Ubai bin Ka’b, “O Abu AlMundhir! Your brother, Ibn Mas’ud said so-and-so (i.e., the two Mu’awwidh-at do not belong to the Quran).” Ubai said, “I asked Allah’s Apostle about them, and he said, 'They have been revealed to me, and I have recited them (as a part of the Quran),” So Ubai added, “So we say as Allah’s Apostle has said.”
Hadith can be read at the official online English translation of Sahih Bukhari at http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/060.sbt.html
Also, your favorite Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani in the commentary of the above tradition records:
المسند والطبراني وابن مردويه من طريق الأعمش عن أبي إسحاق عن عبد الرحمن بن يزيد النخعي قال " كان عبد الله بن مسعود يحك المعوذتين من مصاحفه ويقول إنهما ليستا من كتاب الله.
Al Masnad, Al Tabarani and Ibn Mardaweyh from the way of Al A’mash from Abi Ishaq from Abd al Rahman bin Yazid Al Nakh’I, he said: "Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud used to erase Al Mu’awwidh-at from his Mushafs and say that they (Mu’awwidh-at**) are NOT from Quran .”**
Online Fath al Bari, Kitab Tafseer al Quran
The disclaimer of a famed companion Ibn Masud about Mu’awwidh-at (Surah Naas & Surah Falaq) is that thorn which will keep hurting the throat of Sunnis till Qayamah and some Sunni ulema often try to pull it out by advancing one excuse or another, but it has stuck so badly in their throat that the more they try to pull it out, the further they push it in.
So Mr, are going to call Ibn Masud Kaafir or not? Or you are going to bring osme excuse this time and persist on quoting Shia text only? Munafiqat at its worst!
Fairy tales, so Sunni Imams were habitual of narrating fairy tales, thanx, you are making good impression of your mazhab. See, if You are so stupid that you can not see that I have provided you the “direct link of a Salafi website having the book Tafseer al-Itqan” then no need to show the estreme of your ignorance and stay quite. Dont try to take the excuse that only Saha Satta are the books of Ahle Sunnah, no, there are number of other books which Ahle Sunnah follow and I have all rights to quote anything from them.