Re: Shia And Sunni Muslims
No he didnt, but since your mental capacity has been restricted because of following a few people of banu umayah having doubtful linage, therefore you cannot comprehend it and bring your own absurd qiyas.
Yeah, that Quran will be the Quran compiled by first Imam Ali bin Abi Talib [as] which according to your previous post contained** a great knowledge.** So there isnt anything about tahreef here, the Quran which Imam Mahdi [as] will bring will not have difference of verses rather the difference of ‘meanigs’ which your ancestors deleted 
Thehadith has been taken from the traditions of Sheikh Saffar Qummi and Sheikh Ayashi and it is narrated from Ibrahim bin Umer and there is a difference of opinion about him that whether he was weak or Mothiq [see Tanqeh al Maqal, Volume 1 page 27].
But again, having name of some people does not mean that it tahreef has taken place in verses (ayats) rather those names came as “meanigs” of those verse. The question is, why did your kings deleted those names of kufaar from Quraish, un kay rishtedaroon kay naam to nehen aa gyay thay kaheen 
anyways, aik tuhfa paish e khidmat hai jo apko woh najis nasibi website nehen batayeegi na ho apkay nasibi madaris.
Ahle Sunnah believe that Ali[as]’s name was mentioned in Quran which was deleted out by Uthman.
We read in Holy Quran:
[Shakir 5:67] O Messenger! Deliver what has been revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not delivered His message, and Allah will protect you from the people; surely Allah will not guide the unbelieving people.
We have relied on the following esteemed Sunni Tafseers of above mentioned verse.
- Tafseer Dur al Manthur, Volume 2 page 297, Surah Maidah verse 67 (Online)
- Tafseer Ruh Al Ma’ani, Volume 9 page 193
- Tafseer Fatah al Qadeer, Volume 2 page 57, Surah Maidah verse 67
- Tafseer Mazhari Volume 3 page 353 published by Daar ul Isha`t Karachi
We read in Tafseer Ruh al Ma’ani:
“ Hafiz Ahmed bin Musa bin Mardawayh has narrated with his isnad from Abdullah Ibn Masud that: "During the lifetime of the Holy Prophet (s) we used to recite this verse as:
“O Apostle! Deliver what has been sent down to you from your Lord; 'that ‘Ali is the Maula of the Momineen’, if you don’t….”
Isn’t it sheer injustice on part of Nawasib that they quickly throw edict of Kufr when such traditions are mentioned by any Shia but when some Sunni scholar records or when their beloved sahabi narrates traditions like this, they don’t find any problem with that?