so simply boycotting a business which works against islam is not using enough aql?
as for your statement in bold, which i can agree with in some ways, but is more likely to be disagree-able in its intented form.
as for the employment then i really do not worry about that, even if Allah SWT gives them less, less can be more. actually ive never come across worry for the employment of people in haram activities before today. Allah sustains them today and Allah will sustain tomorrow with blessings, if He wishes
the site kchughtai is using above asks muslims to voluntarily stop working for shezan. no disagreements do i offer for such advice
its a realistic possibility that the snowball effects of successful boycotting could lead to these big companies and their activities.
bring them into compliance aswell, why not
it would be better for us, in the hereafter
youve been over this time and time again, theres something missing, something wrong. worrying is your looking for ‘historical’ sources! where did you learn that from! (i know btw)
People do not even have to have ANY reason to not drink, eat, wear etc. any particular item. As long as it is not directly harming ANYONE in particular.
We just have to respect their choices in their own lives. None of our business.
If someone drinks Shezan fine. If not, then still fine.
Why not ‘pure’ Muslims actually invest in Pakistan (as opposed to having properties in ‘salibi’ countries) and manufacture products, the profits from which should go to propagating ‘pure’ version of Islam? If they are good enough, they would hurt ‘kafir’ businesses, so you benefit both ways.
Much better than taking down someone who actually invested in the country. If you don’t like the idea, don’t drink Shezan. The general level of health in our country would improve a lot if we reduce consumption of carbonated beverages and sugar anyways.
Against Islam? any proofs besides some statements from misinformed Mullahs? If we assume that Sheezan contributed in propagating this particular sect in Russia, then who stopped Khadimen e Haramain Shareed and their allies spread all over the world (killing Muslims to propagate their brand of Islam) to invest something in replying to such efforts through publishing and distributing literature in those areas to make their point. Are their funding is limited to killing Muslims who don’t agree to their brand of Islam?
I think hereafter would be much better if we think for the humanity irrespective of any religious affiliation.
I never proclaimed to be scholar of history, but atleast I would not follow the sources ( religious or historical) that spread bigotry just because of ideological differences.
yes against islam, i have religious reasons for accepting the fatwa. having nothing against the qadiani people, i feel closeness to them with our shared ethnicity, but the leadership obviously has a desire to propagate their beliefs using the islamic name. this is what is really problematic, its too provokative a step. the russian translation fraud attempt funded by pakistani money, is not the only reason for the boycott but the owner obviously feels funding qadianism is something he will aggresively partake in. i think its a good, (very) moderate step to simply boycott his business empire
i dont know which group or what you are refering to here. i dont think i have come across a situation involving muslims killing muslims to propagate their brand of islam. give more details
if you mean sectarian killings then i missed the period at its height. however the rise to power of khomeni rings alarm bells. defector statements suggest khomeni wanted to play games inside pakistan. if you say money came from such and such country to oppose this, then yeah its pretty likely that it did. theres been no notice-able effort in this field to propagate a brand of islam using this tactic from either side. one of the sides involved uses the term ‘wahabi’ to describe all sunni opposition. i am aware at the public refutation side of things all schools are involved, but organisations dedicated to ASWJ representation are local hanafis
ideally other communities and ideologies should be taken with delicate care by muslims
pakistan was founded on something similar to what you say you do not follow, they said they couldnt live with hindus. we cannot give hindus or other ideologies a fatwa other then they are following an unislamic path. however that doesnt mean this should lead to hatred by itself. muslims are advised to treat others justly whilst maintaining our own guidelines
as you can see in my doubt over pakistan concept living with other ideologies is not the problem. nor is there a wish to deny basic rights.
however without looking into the beliefs of all parties involved we cannot come to see where the problems are, and how to rectify them. for example did you know one of groups you are speaking on behalf of cannot have beliefs which are same as mainstream muslims, they are advised to choose something even though it is false. can you see the opportunity for provokation here? another has come to prefer distributing altered copies our texts. the fact is there are issues here that need dealing with for the betterment of our society
