Stir 4 teaspoons sugar and ginger in warm water. Add yeast and let stand for 10 minutes.
Add remaining 4 tablespoons sugar, shortening and salt in scalded milk and stir to dissolve sugar. Cool the milk mixture to the same temperature as the yeast mixture.
Transfer the mixture into a large bowl and add half the flour and mix with a fork, gradually add rest of the flour and continue mixing until smooth. Then knead with hands until elastic and smooth.
Place the dough in bowl, brush with oil, cover and let stand for at least 1 1\2 hours or until double in size.
Place the dough on floured surface. Punch down the dough and divide into 12-14 equal portions. Cover them with a damp cloth to prevent from drying.
Roll each portion between floured hands into very smooth balls.
Cover the balls with a damp cloth. Using fingers, gently flatten balls. Cover and let rest 10 minutes.
On well floured surface lightly roll one ball of dough at a time into a 7 inch round, turning dough over once. Work with enough flour so dough does not stick.
Place the nan on a baking sheet. Using a pastry brush, glaze the nan with egg white and sprinkle with sesame seeds.
Bake 2-3 at a time in 450F about 5-8 minutes or until golden brown. Repeat with remaining dough.
10 Allow nan to cool slightly and smear with a thin layer of butter before wrapping for storage.
In Islamabad, I remember, sheermaal was a sweetened large sized bun. I had something when I went to chicago and I have no clue which of the two it was, sheermaal or taaftaan. It looks like a roghni naan with a checkered pattern on it, slightly sweet and a little sticky. It was yum. It may have been sheermaal cos I remember telling our host that I was expecting a meetha bun when she spoke of sheermaal. Whatever it was, it was darn good. Gotta try the other one next time I go.
Faisal bhai yup we have it the other way round. Sheermal is what you can eat by itself and taaftaan is the thicker one.
FF the thing you are talking abt the one you had in chicago must be taftaan if it was similar to a bun or as Faisal bhai said some ppl use the reverse names…Sheermaal here is like a naan but since its kneaded in milk and ghee you can imagine its more chewy and soft…its doughy…and yup its yummmmmm i have it for breakfast a lot when i am in pak
No it wasn’t a bun Irem. It was a chewy naan, so I guess it was Sheermaal after all! When they said we would have sheermaal I was execting a bun but it wasn’t.
Talking of reversed terminology…those cake rusks…are they called papay in karachi or punjab? I had one karachi friend saying it and another karachi friend making fun of it so I don’t know who says what
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
first u mistake sheermaal with taftaan and then papay with rusk..
[/QUOTE]
There is no mistake. Show a taftaan and a sheermal to a Lahori and a Karachi-wallah and see what they say. Likely, it will be opposite of each other.
Oye jaali Pir… Papay and rusks are the same things…Difference being ‘gol walay’ ya ‘lambay walay’…Lahore walay are so much more sophisticated…Rusk indeed…
It’s simple, sheermal is red, delicious, thick and soft with which you eat the qourmas at shaadis with and have tiny kneaded holes in the middle, are thin from the center and thick from the edges…
Taaftan have the same look but they are white, not red…
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Lajawab: *
Taaftan have the same look but they are white, not red...
[/QUOTE]
Taftaan are white??? Gosh, what have I been eating all these years. What I remember is that they are brown and very slim, and not fluffy like a sheermaal. They look like a roghni naan, but don't have fluffed out sides.
Resolution:
Could somebody be so kind as to post pictures of taaftaan and sheermaal, papay and rusks so we might be able to resolve this confusion and bridge the gaps between Karachi and Lahore.
Much appreciated
btw in punjab rusks are the round ones which I find very tasteless and the long ones are cake rusks which are yum especially when slightly overbaked
Taaftaan: it is phuffy, thicker on the side, buffy, lighter red, smaller-than-sheermaal type of bread. If you dip taaftaan in qorma it will suck more salam in it because it is phuffy and buffy. See the word taaftaan also sound like somthing that is thick.
Sheermaal: it is darker red, flat throughout, thinner, a bit heavier, net type pattern from center to almost the edge, more greasy/oily type of bread. It is easier to grab stuff in it like boti or kabab because it is thinner and more flexible than taaftaan.
Paapay/Rusk: the terms are almost interchangable. However, paapay refers more commonly to gol walay, whereas lambay walay are more often referred to as rusk.
This is atleast what we karachites call it. So all u lahore people...get with it :D
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sky: *
OK, let me set this straight:
Taaftaan: it is phuffy, thicker on the side, buffy, lighter red, smaller-than-sheermaal type of bread. If you dip taaftaan in qorma it will suck more salam in it because it is phuffy and buffy. See the word taaftaan also sound like somthing that is thick.
Sheermaal: it is darker red, flat throughout, thinner, a bit heavier, net type pattern from center to almost the edge, more greasy/oily type of bread. It is easier to grab stuff in it like boti or kabab because it is thinner and more flexible than taaftaan.
Paapay/Rusk: the terms are almost interchangable. However, paapay refers more commonly to gol walay, whereas lambay walay are more often referred to as rusk.
This is atleast what we karachites call it. So all u lahore people...get with it :D
[/QUOTE]
Exquisite descriptions of both, but you have them inter changed I believe...Taftaans are cooked in oil while Sheermaal is baked in an oven...