Shahrukh Khan is not an actor

[Sajalina]

Did anyone notice how girly his clothes looked
in that song in “kal ho na ho”?
I think he wore a red kameez, black shalwar, and a black doppata.
And to top all that I believe his kameez had mirrors on it.

[ch_and-be_ii]

^
and only shahrukh can pull it off without looking sissy.

[lastknightess]

Hritik :love:…will never forget the crying scenes in K3G…:love: those eyes of his :love:

[BoReD_iN_BrIsBaNe]

Re: Shahrukh Khan is not an actor

*Originally posted by Asif2000: *
I have seen lots and lots and lotsa people obsessed with Shahrukh’s acting and his so called talent. I just don’t get it. I don’t even consider him an actor because every movie I have seen him in, he is exactly the same. He never ever brings anything new into his role. He always looks like that emotional cry baby with same type of dialog delivery and same body gestures and exactly same face expressions every time. Nothing ever new.
.

totally agree with u :k:

but ill watch his movies ne way

[ch_and-be_ii]

what is wrong with u ppl! Don't find him or his acting lame however I look at em( him and his acting).

[Rising_Tempest]

yeah i agree with the point that SRK's acting ,gesture and even the dailogue delievery remain the same in every movie...i mean he doesnt adapt to the requirments of the character that well....in every movie SRK remains the hero , the actor we all know but not the character what he is perfoming in the movie,while acting in the movie , he shud forget about his being SRK rather he shud give more stress on the character....i think amir khan in this case is better than SRK ,he looks different in most of the movies (at least the in the last two moives)..

[Asif2000]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Crescent_: *
you guys don't understand the mature and proffessional levels that srk acts upon. His acting is uncomparable, there isn't an actor who touches someone more than srk with his acting!
[/QUOTE]

Sure.. he touched me too but only in the first movie I saw him in. It gets old because he never changes. Every next movie he is in seems like the next episode of the previous movie you just watched.

[karina]

I thought SRK did a fine job in Asoka. I watched that movie twice because in the second half he was outstanding - and he didn’t stammer yammer so much. Do you know how many goras watched that movie and fell in love with him?

So take that all you peoples who are calling him langoor and whatnot!

[karina]

*Originally posted by SAJAL: *
Did anyone notice how girly his clothes looked
in that song in “kal ho na ho”?
I think he wore a red kameez, black shalwar, and a black doppata.
And to top all that I believe his kameez had mirrors on it.

It’s called dressing metrosexually. It’s cool, it’s in. There was a fashion show recently where the guys wore scrumptious dhotis and pajamas, bare chest, jewellery, and sindoor on their maang! Yeeow…they looked HOT.

[Asif2000]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chandbeti: *
what is wrong with u ppl! Don't find him or his acting lame however I look at em( him and his acting).
[/QUOTE]

So it seems that the guy is mostly famous among girls. I wonder whats behind it. Is it his colorful cloths, his fake tears in his eyes, his "crappy-gelled" hair, his same old character that grew old on me in his second movie I watched or something else that I am not aware of. Whateva it is, it ain't his acting unless you have no taste at all.

[Asif2000]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by karina: *
Do you know how many goras watched that movie and fell in love with him?

[/QUOTE]

I dont't blame those fags falling in love with a guy in red cloths. If they weren't fags, they prolly didn't know its a guy.