"Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

Please read the part in red closely.

“Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities”
The Latest Neocon Lie About Iran
GARY LEUPP
May 26, 2006

Now that Canada’s National Post has apologized for the disinformational article about Iran it published on its front page last Friday, one should inquire as to how this happened in the first place.

The neocons, of course, have shown themselves more than willing to employ deceit in building the case for military action; it is part of their Straussian modus ope*****. However much their “intelligence” about Iraq, disseminated through Douglas Feith’s Office of Special Plans and media sycophants like Judith Miller, has been discredited, they’re plodding on with their strategy of vilifying yet another regime to build popular support for its overthrow.

Looking at the big picture, what they’ve done so far is to persuade much of the American public that Iran is doing something illegal in enriching uranium and insisting on its right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to do so; that Iran is definitely trying to build nuclear weapons; and that Iran has declared its intention of “wiping Israel off the map.” The first of these is untrue. The NPT expressly allows all signatory nations to master the nuclear cycle under IAEA monitoring. The second is unproven. The IAEA has stated repeatedly that there is no evidence for an Iranian nuclear weapons program. The third is a distortion. Iran’s President Ahmadinejad has quoted the late Ayatollah Khomeini as having stated that the “regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from from the page of time.” But this same Ahmadinejad was of course immediately identified in the U.S. press after his election last June as one of those who seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979, taking U.S. diplomats and CIA agents hostage. The deception was soon exposed, but the strategy here is to vilify and have faith that the vilification will linger after the specific charge has been dropped.

In 1990, after Iraq invaded Kuwait, the “Citizens for a Free Kuwait,” a front group established by the Hill & Knowlton PR firm to promote war on Iraq, used its ties to California Democrat Tom Lantos and Illinois Republican John Porter to stage the appearance of a teenage Kuwaiti girl at a Congressional hearing on the invasion. She testified that as a volunteer at al-Addan Hospital in Kuwait City she “saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go into the room where . . . babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.” Some of us wondered at the time whether it was likely that Iraqi boys would wantonly slaughter Arab babies in this Kuwaiti hospital. It was later revealed that the girl testifying was a daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S., and that she was lying through her teeth. But the lie worked very, very well, validated by Colin Powell and others in the first Bush administration, and by reputable press organs. Many months later it was shown to be a farce, but of course then the damage had been done.

But those paying attention have to try, and keep raising the slogan: Stop the Attack on Iran!

Gary Leupp is Professor of History at Tufts University, and Adjunct Professor of Comparative Religion. He is the author of Servants, Shophands and Laborers in in the Cities of Tokugawa Japan; Male Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan; and Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1543-1900. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch’s merciless chronicle of the wars on Iraq, Afghanistan and Yugoslavia, Imperial Crusades.

He can be reached at: [email protected]

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

Dress codes have bad memories from the recent past. Mao did that, the Nazis had that stuff, and the Talibans were the most recent regime to enforce dress code.

Instead of blaming neo-cons, or jews, these supporters of Iranian Moolahs should see if Tehran is working on a dress code or not?

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

It's good that Zionist Mercenary does recognize the false claims of neo-cons like Amer Tahiri. This when Amer Tahiri STILL insists that his story is true. sigh.
By the way mercenary, can't you speak on your own that you had to copy/paste a whole article from a website?
My question here is: is it ok to post whole articles?
If this is the case then I can fill every thread with articles from other websites.

antiobl, if by "supporters of Iranian mullahs", you mean me then you are dead wrong. I do not support any holy regime. I don't say that Iranian religious leaders are bad guys, but I say the concept of God's Representatives running a country is wrong. It puts too much responsibility on the self-proclaimed God's Reps, and makes their own acts and interpretations as the Voice of God. It is not the Voice of God, because people differ and change their opinions all the time. The era of such infallibles is gone.
Anyway, enough of this off-topic discussion.

You said that we should stop "blaming" neo-cons and see if Iranian government is working on dress-code.
Here you are mixing to different issues. It is one thing to disapprove Iranian government's working on uniform dress code; and it is another to NOT blame neo-cons and Zionists for their myopic, malignant, fraudulent campaign. These neo-cons have no love lost for dress-code for Iranians.

It would be ok if you don't support Iranian government's decision to implement dress codes. But it would be a moral crime if you support the yellow journalism and blatant lies, irrespective of who does it. These lies coming out of pro-Zionist, anti-Islamic, anti-Iranian, neo-cons, do NOT make them any different than lies coming out of OBL and Zarqawi.

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

dude, you are whining like a baby

read the full post, it has everything to do with the topic...

or is that you have never read anything longer than 2 sentences?

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

^ Yeah, I edited my post.

It's true that I hate reading long copy/pastes from other websites. It's like somebody calling for his mommy when in a fight.

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

LOL...are you calling your mommy now because I am defeating you in every single argument you have put forth?

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

^ In your dreams, may be.
I for one say that one should not boast of his imaginative victories, and leave it upto the reader.
By the way, how old are you?

Why don't you talk with your own mouth, instead of copy/paste, dear racist Zionist Hireling. Do you want me to start copy/pasting long articles as well? Is this what you call "winning"? :)

And do let us know your age.

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

I believe in quality of posts, instead of quantity of posts. While you seem to think that just by wasting more of your time on internet than me, and by posting more than me, you are "winning", then so be with your "winning".
I don't have idle time like you. Instead of dog tail chasing, I would rather not reply. It's not upto you but the reader to decide who is "winning".

If you want reply from me then you have to sum up the article you pasted. If you can not speak for yourself then there is no point replying ("dog tail chasing").

Re: "Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities", debunking a neo-con

This article by Caroline Glixx is so full of hate that I don't wonder any more why there is a war in Israel. HOw could they have peace with such a screwed paranoiac thinking??

Re: “Separate Dress Codes for Religious Minorities”, debunking a neo-con

the american public, and to a larger extent the western public, is a puppet for the american, and other western, governments:
they had been persuaded it was because of Hitler that Iseal had to be created to protect jews (while zionism was an old movement born in britain)

they have been persuaded there was a military (fake proofs) cause to the US war in Viet Nam when there was nothing else than capitalist/cummunist war.

They have been persuaded that it was for human rights to “deliver” Kuwait from Irak, while it was to prevent SAdam (biggest arab leader at the time) to have the control of 20 to 25% of the world’s oil (irak+kuwait) and become an arab superpower who would quickly be kicking saudi a$$ because they side with USA:D.

THey have been persuaded that killing massively cilivian afghans was justified because Afghans were treating their wives like garbage bags (blue burqa, like a garbage bag), and they have been persuaded Al Qaeda would be weaken by war in afghanistan (but it’s gotten worse:halo:)

They have been persuaded there was massive destructiun weapons and links with AlQAeda in irak, to justify war on Irak, while the interest of the white house are the oil fields of irak

now iran…what’s next? sending a big nuclear bomb on moon to destroy alien, as justification to get rid of nuclear waste:D???

can someone call the white house i have a solution for nuclear waste!:o