Segregated workplaces

[ravage]

Re: Segregated workplaces

@diwana

.
Aren’t yo the one who said you would go ahead accept the results and advertise that product A is preferred product all over the world based on same sample size of 2000 and same results.

Yep. And you’re the one who disputes that, solely on the basis of population size. To repeat, a random sample of all over the world of 2000 people is completely valid. If you meant that we take a sample of 2000 from a small pool then apply it to the world, ofcourse thats not going to be right. But the issue there is NOT sample size, its randomness.

Argue all you want, my friend. You know you should not have come out so blatantly agreeing with and showing your gullible mind to accept a crappy ‘study’ with meaningless result ( your words).

My words? No clue what u’re on about. I now know that you think this study is crappy, but you are yet to point us to a study of national opinion that you dont consider as crappy.

Both. But sample size argument is done with. You cannot claim so big when sample size is too small. Never changed my position on that. Even though you may wish.

Ofcourse. Because you reject basic statistics. Thats fine, nobody can force anyone to believe in any branch of science.

No you did not. Those were your own words and all throughout you have been arguing to accept it and defending it.

They’re ‘my words’ in as much as I did not explicitly quote anyone. You were painting a misleading picture saying oh even the article itself acknowledged this and OP is saying X. No, the article is also saying X, infact the OP got it from the article :).

Now bring something useful to discuss in another thread, not matter what you say means nothing to me, find the answers in my above posts if you can read and understand. No need for me to waste my time any more on you or on this so called study.

Oh sure, your mathematical wisdom is littered in this thread. The one thing you failed to bring though was a single national opinion poll that you had come across in your lifetime who’s results you would have accepted as valid in what it claimed to represent.

Especially when you said you will agree with the same reslts on same sample size as VALID, for the whole world population. Again, just can’t let that go. Sorry.

Same sample size is valid, irrespective of the total population.

BTW: Just to let you know, statistical analysis LIKE THIS is NOT solid science like 2+2=4.

Of course. Every other post you go from saying oh that statistics textbook is wrong and statistics is mumbo jumbo and statistics is not solid science to i dont reject statistics and statistics is a useful branch of mathematics.