Scientific Evidence for Religious Miracles

[T1000]

@sharaabee

What is the 1400 BC date about?

Yes Science is ever evolving because scientists do not shut off their heads.. whenever new evidence is found they address is with an open mind. But how does this add any scientific credibility to these miracle stories?

Let’s say there is a theory T. Some people whole heartedly believe that it’s true. But there is no scientific evidence to it. It’s just a theory.. a story.. a dream..whatever..Now.. saying that “Science as of today does not prove it.. but science evolves and someday it will prove it”.. adds NO more scientific credibility to the theory TODAY.

You can make up any theory right now and say “sure.. it doesnt sounds logical as of our understanding today.. but in the future we will get more advanced and then it will make sense”…but it remains a theory.. a story..

1400 was just random figure. say it 1300 or 1500 .. whatever makes you happy.

sound like i am talking to a sensible person. Perfect answer. Now try to understand this thing

as long as some theory, say some random “science” theory is not being proven wrong by today’s technology, it is considered authentic. Right? there were number of scientific facts which were standards for ages unless they were proven wrong .. does that make sense?

so if we accept those wrong theories RIGHT unless they are not proven wrong then why don’t we accept “religious” facts right unless they are proven wrong?

you are raising points on credibililty of mircales and ohter religious stuff. I ask you a question, give me scientific proves stating that those miracles were wrong. I am being specific. Don’t give me theories that it can’t happen so that miracle is impossible. I am asking specific scientific studies proving those miracles wrong.