SC to determine if 17th Amendment altered the basic structure of the constitution

[Haris]

Re: SC to determine if 17th Amendment altered the basic structure of the constitution

@legbreakgoogly

^^

Reality is that Mushy has had his wings clipped.

And seems he has clipped them himself…

@tariqlkhan

^^ Reality is this that Mushy nay ab tuk apnay per phailaa’yaa hee naheen hain. Agay Agay dekhyaay hotaa hai kiya

I have a conspiracy theory. My thoery is this that CJP is Musharraf’s man, working on his agenda to create such a chaos in Pakistan that Msuharraf can justify to international world that Martial Law is the only option

You think that Musharraf is afraid of Media or SC or polticians. He gives a damn to them. He is only afraid of Khan Bahadur Goergy baby.

This is also quite accurate.

@king_faisal

if this is true, then it is the stupidest thing i have ever heard. 1973 constitution is not a divine document created to exist in its unmodified form for all of eternity. constitution of pakistan is a man made document which reflects the wishes of pakistanis whose views are represented by members of national assembly. thus spirit of constitution can only be determined by people of pak because they are the ones who are responsible for making it. supreme court’s task under the constitution is to ensure that all laws of pak comply with constitution. supreme court cannot tell people of pak that pakistani people cannot amend a document made by the people in the first place. for example if pakistanis want a presidential form of government and they provide 2/3rds majority to a party advocating presidential form of government, then the supreme court cannot stand in the way because otherwise judges of supreme court would be deemed to have more power than the people of pakistan. btw 6th amendment to pak constitution pretty shows who is the boss. google it up.

also to me the fact that supreme court would entertain challenges to their own judgement indicates that supreme court now wants to grab political power. musharraf would be well within his rights to impose martial law should supreme court annul laws it declared legal in the first place. no govt can function if every single one its actions are challenged in the supreme court even those that were previously declared constitutional. while martial would be negative in the short run, its a lot better than having destiny of pak being controlled by a bunch o bozos siting in the supreme court.

:k: