Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed

It seems like Arab countries are starting to react against the Syrian dictatorship.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/08/saudi-king-ambassador-syria

Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed
Statement is sharpest criticism yet directed by Saudi Arabia against Arab state since Middle East unrest began

Share
15
reddit this
Reuters
The Guardian, Monday 8 August 2011
Article history

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah has said events in Syria have ‘nothing to do with religion, or values, or ethics’. Photograph: Hassan Ammar/AP
Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah has demanded an end to the bloodshed in Syria and recalled his country’s ambassador from Damascus, in a rare case of one of the Arab world’s most powerful leaders intervening against another.

It was the sharpest criticism the oil giant – a monarchy who bans political opposition – has directed against any Arab state since a wave of protests roiled the Middle East and toppled autocrats in Tunisia and Egypt.

“What is happening in Syria is not acceptable for Saudi Arabia,” he said in a written statement read out on Al Arabiya satellite television.

Events in Syria had “nothing to do with religion, or values, or ethics”, the king said.

A crackdown by Syria’s president Bashar al-Assad against protests has become one of the most violent episodes in the wave of unrest sweeping through the Arab world this year.

Activists said troops with tanks had launched an assault on the city of Deir al-Zor in the east of the country, killing dozens. The past week has seen scores of people killed in a siege of Hama, a city where Assad’s father launched a crackdown nearly 30 years ago, killing thousands.

Assad’s government says it is fighting against criminals and armed extremists who have provoked violence by attacking its troops. Activists and western countries say Assad’s forces have attacked peaceful protesters.

“Syria should think wisely before it’s too late and issue and enact reforms that are not merely promises but actual reforms,” the Saudi king said.

“Either it chooses wisdom on its own or it will be pulled down into the depths of turmoil and loss.”

The Arab League, in a rare response to the escalating bloodshed in Syria, called on authorities there to stop acts of violence against civilians.

Although several Arab states have joined the west in opposing Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, most of the region’s rulers have been cautious about criticising other Arab leaders during the protests.

King Abdullah sent Saudi troops in March to help neighbouring monarchy Bahrain put down anti-government protests, and Saudi officials have criticised the decision to put Egypt’s ousted leader Hosni Mubarak on trial.

Saudi Arabia has acted as a mediator in neighbouring Yemen, and is hosting its president Ali Abdullah Saleh, who went there for medical treatment after being wounded in a bomb attack when protests against his rule turned into open conflict.

Re: Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed

all the while saudi king deploys ambassadors to bahrain, seeking bloodshed.

Saudi troops enter bahrain

Re: Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed

"King Abdullah is shocked that a regime could attack its own people, which is why he sent peacekeepers to Bahrain to protect civilians."

Re: Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed

People clearly can see hypocrisy of Saudi, In Bahrain they sent in troops in Syria they recall the ambassador

Saudi has spent hundreds of billions on military equipment and training soldiers whats the problem why wait????

these dictators all the same they don't care less about what happens to the people as long as they keep their positions as leaders!

Re: Saudi king recalls ambassador and demands end to Syria bloodshed

Epic stuff from Pepe Escobar of Asia Times abt the saudis…

My minaret is bigger than yours

London’s burning. Wall Street’s burning. Global markets are burning. While Rome burns, the House of Saud fiddles - dreams of expanding torture and building a monster minaret coupled with scolding Syria for repressing its own people. The “international community” barely emits a peep; when you’re a Medieval family dynasty sitting on an ocean of oil, you can get away with virtually anything.

Ailing, Saudi King Abdullah’s official statement demanding an end to the bloodshed in Syria has already secured its place in the annals of 21st century hypocrisy. The king’s speech, referring to Bashar al-Assad’s rule, points out “either it chooses wisdom willingly, or drifts into the depths of chaos and loss”. The king also calls for “quick and comprehensive reforms” in the face of protests that have claimed the lives of more than 1,600 people.

Even Monty Python in its heyday could not come up with a sketch of the mega-repressive House of Saud preaching democracy lessons to unsuspecting Arabs. .

This is a regime that gave refuge to ousted Tunisian dictator Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali; was furious with the Barack Obama administration for abandoning Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak; invaded Bahrain in a neo-imperialist fit invoking a murky Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) military deal to save the al-Khalifa dynasty from pro-democracy protesters; pre-empted pro-democracy protests in Saudi Arabia itself; invited two other impoverished, oil-deprived Arab monarchies, Jordan and Morocco, to be part of the wealthy GCC; conducted a relentless counter-revolutionary drive to destroy any possibility of an Arab Spring in the Gulf; and is actively picking the next ruler in Yemen - imposing a GCC-devised “transition plan” that has nothing to do with the wishes of Yemeni pro-democracy protesters.

While preaching “reforms” in Syria, “reform” in Saudi Arabia itself means the king dispensing with tens of billions of dollars to buy up even the possibility of dissent. Moreover, the House of Saud despises the mere possibility of democracy in Syria. What it does want - badly - is Sunnis to monopolize power in Syria, preferably via the Muslim Brotherhood, to the detriment of Assad-linked Allawis in Syria and Shi’ites in Iran.

Damascus under Assad is closely aligned with Tehran. As much as it’s a nasty police state, Syria is a secular republic. The House of Saud despises secular Arab republics - from Assad’s Syria to Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. No wonder the House of Saud - as well as Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates - have been financing the key Muslim Brotherhood strand of the Syrian opposition, as well as more unsavory Salafi elements.

The bottom line is King Abdullah - followed by the minions in the GCC, also known as the Gulf Counter-Revolutionary Club, and the toothless Arab League - has already positioned the wealthy Gulf monarchies for a Sunni-controlled, post-Assad Syria. Washington is not exactly unhappy, as it is about to give Assad its marching orders.

Reaching for the stars
Meanwhile, in Jeddah - against any economic or ecological justification - a $1.23 billion tower of over one kilometer in height will be built to celebrate Saudi primacy. You can’t make this stuff up; the builders will be none other than the Bin Laden Group. Dead Osama must be kicking in his Arabian Sea grave.

The project’s mastermind is Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, the world’s 19th-wealthiest man, and the wealthiest Arab businessman, with hefty stakes, among others, in Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, Citigroup and Apple.

The tower, with a design inspired by a desert plant, will be the world’s tallest - beating Dubai’s 2009 Burj Khalifa by 172 meters. It’s open to debate whether this monster Saudi minaret reflects worship of Allah or worship of oil wealth and financial markets.

As it stands, all the world’s top towers are in Asia or in the Gulf. The Burj Khalifa, 828 meters high, is followed by the Canton Tower in Guangzhou (600 meters), Taipei 101 in Taipei (508 meters), the Shanghai World Financial Center (492 meters) and the IFC in Hong Kong (484 meters). The days of primacy by the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur (410 meters) are long gone.

Torture in da house
Yet the towering achievement of the House of Saud has got to be what it has in store in terms of criminalizing any possibility of dissent in the kingdom. New “anti-terrorism” legislation still to be approved will condemn to at least 10 years in jail anyone who doubts the integrity of the king or the crown prince.

The Ministry of Interior - led by sinister Prince Nayef - will have virtually unlimited powers. Torture - already in effect - will be virtually institutionalized. Detention and isolation - with no access to lawyers - will be extended to 120 days, or ad infinitum, depending on the judgment of a special court, under charges that range from “endangering … national unity” to “harming the reputation of the state”. Beheadings - merrily dispensed especially against Asian workers - will proliferate.

Blame the House of Saud’s paranoia on the Arab Spring; the emergence of a Shi’ite-dominated Iraq; the resilience of the Islamic Republic of Iran; and the unshakeable perception in Riyadh of a Shi’ite conspiracy, organized by Tehran, to smash the GCC monarchies.

So this is what passes for “reform” in Saudi Arabia; an Arab version of “you’re either with us or against us”. Cynics will drink to the brotherhood of Saudi Arabia and the West Texas so beloved by George W Bush. Amnesty International gloomily forecasts massive violation of human rights lying ahead. Immersed in a torture-and-minarets daze, the House of Saud will solemnly ignore them all.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MH11Ak01.html