Re: Sarah Palin in India
Well if Sarah Palin was President of the US, then she would have insight we all would be intrested in. But seeing as how she is completely inexperienced, and completely dense, I dont see how you can draw a comparison.
You tell me, who would be more interesting for you, as someone interested in politics to listen to, Former PM of India Narsimah Rao, or Sarah Palin? Im not asking you to compare their intellect, im just saying who do you think is more relevant to someone who is interested in politics, Rao who was pm of India, or Sarah Palin former governor of one of the most sparsely populated states in the US?
Musharaf is not relevent to India? Obviously there are people in India who are interested in what goes on in Pakistan, otherwise how would you explain why you and your Indian compatriots are here? So obviously there are people intrested in what Musharaf can tell them. Also, im sure people in India would love to know more about the war on terror, Afghanistan, etc etc. Musharaf, being the President of Pakistan and having dealt with such issues, can provide some perspective on such issues that the laymen in India would not be privy to.
Any way you slice it, a person who has lead a country, especially a country like Pakistan in the last ten years, is far more relevant then you would think.
Its pretty obvious that you are letting your personal views about Palin cloud your objectivity here. Palin or Musharraf or anyone else, there will be people who like/dislike them. In the end, its the India Today Group which decides what is in its best interest. What you or I think is irrelevant here.