Well that was wrong wasn't it. Who knew that normal Iraqis we hiding these weapons and never used them against Saddam, perhaps a leader like him is needed after all the people must of loved him since they didn't use these weapons against him, no?
Re: Re: Saddams Son's likely Dead or Taken in During Tuesday Raid.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chota: *
What a sick way of celebrating death and targetted murder, tsk tsk.
[/QUOTE]
Very true Chota. Look at him celebrating the deaths of Iraqi's, and even going on about how these killings will have positive economic effects for the USA. Pathetic.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Finally, after killing over 6000 innocent Iraqi civilians the US get's something right...
[/QUOTE]
Look at who Malik?
The person(s) who post threads to celebrate when Iraqi’s and Muslims are killed, and who go around making light of when leaders (especially Muslim one’s) are ill. Also, the person(s) who make countless excuses, but no condemnations when thousands of Iraqis men, women, children and babies have been killed by murdering US troops.
P.S. I know you are losing your temper and manners all over, but have you ever been able to detect sarcasm? Re what you just quoted. 
I've always been a supporter of a sarcastic period, a little square rather than the little dot to indicate sarcasm as it often does not come through in writing. So you are sadden by the loss of the Saddam's lads I take it? I can assure you I am not losing my temper, the truth is I don’t remember the last time I did.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
I can assure you I am not losing my temper, the truth is I don’t remember the last time I did.
[/QUOTE]
Don't worry everything will be ok? :)
When you are back on level ground could you tell us what excuses you have for the US military killing 9000 plus Iraqi civilians, including babies and children? After all they were killed mainly in the "shock and awe" bombing that you have spent so many months celebrating?
Would you like to retract your statement that the Iraqi resistance would crumble after the killings of Saddam's sons?
Thanks Malik, maybe you could come over and give me a hug.
A catch 22, do something and a % will be killed, do nothing and a larger % will be killed. Your logic says doing nothing is the right thing to do, we can agree to disagree.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
...
A catch 22, do something and a % will be killed, do nothing and a larger % will be killed. Your logic says doing nothing is the right thing to do, we can agree to disagree.
[/QUOTE]
This is based on assumption that "do something" is in direction of achieving something real (not for media or making general public fool), while "do nothing" is in direction of "useless".
ok and?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
A catch 22, do something and a % will be killed...
[/QUOTE]
Translating into do something for selfish strategic and economic interests and based on total lies told to your public over WMD and such. That means killing 9000 plus Iraqi civilians, including babies and children in a military operation of " shock and we" which you have praised over and over again. It's good to see your true side emerging...
hugs :)
Suppose you take the high number of civilian casualties of 9000. If Saddam were still in power, there would surely more than that murdered by his regime during the same time. Throw in the thousands that would have been displaced, raped, improperly imprisoned and tortured by everyone's favorite madman dictator and the liberation of Iraq is a no brainer. Not to mention that if terrorists would stop killing civilians, Iraqi police and aid workers while sabotaging the Iraqi economy their situation would improve even more. If real Iraqi leaders would emerge and constructively work to improve the plight of their people instead of murdering them, this could be the best thing to happen to the Middle East since the invention of air conditioning.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Changez_like: *
People were also sayin that a Saddam out of power is useless, then his son's death would slow down "resistance" and now what?
[/QUOTE]
Exactly Changez, and now those people have been proven wrong so badly, but they can't face upto it. Hence the personal insults being thrown around by those same people..:)
Seminole, could you imagine the U.S. making Iraq a self sufficient country where the people would be empowered and have freedoms and choices? Some believe this would put their whole belief system in jeopardy. So, to some this is seen as a war on Islam, they know if the infidels build a country where people want to live, one that is free, they fear it would shake Islam’s foundation, people would embrace the infidels way of thought and god forbid their way of life which is freedom, you can’t keep the people down then. They want control, Islam and freedom can exist and that scares them even more.
Seminole:
"If Saddam were still in power, there would surely more than that murdered by his regime during the same time. Throw in the thousands that would have been displaced, raped, improperly imprisoned and tortured by everyone's favorite madman dictator and the liberation of Iraq is a no brainer."
I did this same calculus, and was met with a resounding yawn. The ultimate irony is that in Iraq today, the victims of Saddam, the Shia's and Kurds are largely peaceful, and effective in controlling their areas.