Sacred geography

muqawwee123 · January 5, 2013, 7:49am

There are report that suggests that places and people mentioned in religious scriptures never existed.

What is your opinion about this?

Do you think preserving archeological places support authentication of faith or faith is beyond these things?

devilish_angel · January 5, 2013, 9:12am

Re: Sacred geography

for me faith is beyond these things

muqawwee123 · January 5, 2013, 9:58am

Re: Sacred geography

Truth is above all faiths. isn't it. Just asking?

devilish_angel · January 5, 2013, 10:04am

Re: Sacred geography

Exactly

muqawwee123 · January 5, 2013, 10:07am

Re: Sacred geography

so if one day you find truth against the scripture, what will be your reaction?

Ali_Syed · January 5, 2013, 11:15am

Re: Sacred geography

I think faith is above these things, but like you mentioned many places have not been reserved and hence lost due to neglect.

devilish_angel · January 5, 2013, 2:16pm

Re: Sacred geography

well for me, it doesn't matter

calypsodc · January 5, 2013, 3:22pm

Re: Sacred geography

confused here…
Like who for example ? Rama, Krishna, Ayodhya, Dwaraka, Buddha, Bodh Gaya, Christ ,Jerusalem, Mohammed, Mecca. These places certainly exist but as for the divinity of the people mentioned, I suppose it is a matter of faith.

muqawwee123 · January 5, 2013, 4:20pm

Re: Sacred geography

Then why we keep on quoting researches which prove the things mentioned in our scriptures?

devilish_angel · January 5, 2013, 4:43pm

Re: Sacred geography

I think to tell others

muqawwee123 · January 5, 2013, 4:56pm

Re: Sacred geography

and then we say that any report suggesting otherwise than our scriptures doesn’t matter. Isn’t it ‘meetha meetha hup hup, kaRwa karwa thoo thoo’