Re: SA V India
let see with the return of luxman, if there is any significant difference.
Re: SA V India
let see with the return of luxman, if there is any significant difference.
Re: SA V India
SA 216/1 .
Re: SA V India
Another century by Amla.
SA 216/1 .
And SA 266/9 :D
Re: SA V India
lgta hai SA walon ko hamari team ki hawa lg gyi hai :D
![]()
Re: SA V India
India 171/2
Way to go Team India :k:
lgta hai SA walon ko hamari team ki hawa lg gyi hai :D
Ab SA ki performance itni buri bhi nahin hai :)
losing 8 wickets in 78 runs in a test match, if thats your definition of “itni bhi buri nahi hai” then what can we say ![]()
Well, if comparison to SA makes you feel good about your team then what can we say ![]()
Probably ‘comprehension’ is something someone lacked ![]()
Yup, I realized that from your first post itself ![]()
you don’t have to scratch pole now ![]()
Re: SA V India
good come back by India. Four centuries! S.A needs 340 or so to save the match
Re: SA V India
India 643/6 delcared :k:
SA need 341 runs to avoid an innings defeat ![]()
Yeah, I’ll leave that for you ![]()
Re: SA V India
Any info on rules and regulation for the cricket bat?
I notice the Laxman guy using very wide bat, with this sort of bat even my grand ma can score century....
^ well there are limits only on bat size (max. length: 38 inches) and blade width (4.25 inches) but no limit on actual weight of the bat and there is no reason to really believe that Laxman has been or is violating any of those laws. It is just that South African bowlers have been outplayed in this game by Indian batters!
just like you left comprehension for rest of us ![]()